| Literature DB >> 23130571 |
David Doku1, Subas Neupane, Paul Narh Doku.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study investigates factors determining the timing of antenatal care (ANC) visit and the type of delivery assistant present during delivery among a national representative sample of Ghanaian women.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23130571 PMCID: PMC3538706 DOI: 10.1186/1472-698X-12-29
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Int Health Hum Rights ISSN: 1472-698X
Distribution of socio-demographic factors in relation to the timing of antenatal care visit and type of delivery assistance among Ghanaian women
| | | P=0.004 | | P<0.001 | | |
| 15-24 years | 505 | 24.0 | 22.7 | 26.4 | 21.3 | 27.5 |
| 25-34 years | 982 | 46.8 | 49.6 | 42.0 | 50.9 | 41.9 |
| 35-49 years | 612 | 29.1 | 27.7 | 31.6 | 27.8 | 30.6 |
| | | P<0.001 | P<0.001 | |||
| Urban | 844 | 40.2 | 54.4 | 15.7 | 44.8 | 36.0 |
| Rural | 1255 | 59.8 | 45.6 | 84.3 | 55.2 | 64.0 |
| | | P<0.001 | P<0.001 | |||
| 1 | 467 | 22.3 | 25.9 | 16.1 | 23.8 | 21.3 |
| 2 | 436 | 20.8 | 22.7 | 17.4 | 23.9 | 16.7 |
| 3 | 349 | 16.6 | 17.0 | 16.1 | 17.2 | 15.9 |
| 4 or more | 846 | 40.3 | 34.4 | 59.5 | 35.8 | 46.0 |
| | | P=0.166 | P=0.976 | |||
| Never married | 129 | 6.1 | 6.8 | 4.8 | 6.2 | 6.1 |
| Currently married | 1837 | 87.5 | 86.6 | 89.0 | 87.8 | 87.7 |
| Formerly married | 133 | 6.3 | 6.5 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.3 |
| | | P<0.001 | P<0.001 | |||
| No education | 647 | 30.8 | 20.3 | 49.0 | 25.2 | 37.1 |
| Primary | 511 | 24.1 | 22.8 | 27.2 | 23.8 | 24.1 |
| Secondary or higher | 939 | 44.8 | 56.9 | 23.8 | 51.0 | 38.8 |
| | | P<0.001 | P<0.001 | |||
| Other | 90 | 4.3 | 3.5 | 5.8 | 3.6 | 4.3 |
| Moslem | 378 | 18.0 | 16.3 | 21.0 | 15.2 | 22.7 |
| Traditional | 126 | 6.0 | 2.3 | 12.4 | 3.7 | 8.1 |
| Christian | 1504 | 71.7 | 78.0 | 60.8 | 77.5 | 64.8 |
| | | P<0.001 | P<0.001 | |||
| Poorest | 480 | 22.9 | 10.3 | 44.6 | 17.3 | 28.5 |
| Poorest | 461 | 22.0 | 19.2 | 26.5 | 19.9 | 24.0 |
| Middle | 400 | 19.1 | 20.3 | 17.0 | 19.1 | 19.6 |
| Rich | 436 | 20.8 | 27.2 | 9.8 | 23.1 | 19.0 |
| Richest | 322 | 15.3 | 22.9 | 2.1 | 20.6 | 9.0 |
| | | P<0.001 | P<0.001 | |||
| No education | 483 | 25.7 | 15.0 | 44.3 | 19.8 | 31.8 |
| Primary | 159 | 8.5 | 7.1 | 10.8 | 7.1 | 10.0 |
| Secondary or higher | 1236 | 65.8 | 77.9 | 44.9 | 73.0 | 58.2 |
| | | P<0.001 | | | ||
| Early (within first trimester) | 1154 | 57.3 | 37.8 | 52.0 | | |
| Late | 860 | 42.7 | 62.2 | 48.9 | | |
| | | P<0.001 | | P<0.001 | ||
| No visit | 72 | 3.5 | 0.9 | 8.2 | | |
| 1-3 visits | 338 | 16.5 | 9.8 | 28.2 | 6.5 | 31.1 |
| 4-6 visits | 900 | 43.9 | 41.2 | 48.3 | 41.4 | 51.2 |
| 6 visits or more | 740 | 36.1 | 48.0 | 15.3 | 52.0 | 17.7 |
| | | | | P<0.001 | ||
| Trained assistants | 1330 | 63.5 | | | 70.9 | 57.8 |
| Traditional birth assistants | 642 | 30.6 | | | 24 | 35.6 |
| No one | 124 | 5.9 | 4.4 | 6.5 | ||
Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for factors associated with early antenatal care visit among Ghanaian women in 2008
| 15-24 years | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 25-34 years | 1.6 (1.2-1.9) | 1.5 (1.2-1.9) | 1.5 (1.1-1.9) |
| 35-49 years | 1.2 (0.9-1.5) | 1.2 (1.0-1.6) | 0.2 (0.9-1.6) |
| Rural | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
| Urban | 1.4 (1.2-1.7) | 1.2 (1.0-1.5) | |
| 1 | 1.0 | | |
| 2 | 1.3 (0.9-1.7) | | |
| 3 | 1.0 (0.7-1.3) | | |
| 4 or more | 0.7 (0.5-0.9) | | |
| Never married | 1.0 | | |
| Currently married | 1.0 (0.7-1.4) | | |
| Formerly married | 1.0 (0.6-1.6) | | |
| No education | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
| Primary | 1.4 (1.1-1.8) | 1.2 (1.0-1.6) | |
| Secondary or Higher | 1.9 (1.5-2.3) | 1.2 (1.0-1.6) | |
| Traditional | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Moslem | 1.5 (1.0-2.3) | 1.2 (0.8-1.9) | 1.4 (0.8-2.2) |
| Christian | 2.6 (1.8-3.9) | 1.8 (1.2-2.7) | 1.8 (1.1-2.8) |
| Poorest | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Poorer | 1.4 (1.0-1.8) | 1.2 (0.9-1.6) | 1.0 (0.7-1.4) |
| Middle | 1.6 (1.2-2.1) | 1.4 (1.0-2.0) | 1.2 (0.8-1.6) |
| Richer | 2.0 (1.5-2.6) | 1.8 (1.2-2.6) | 1.6 (1.1-2.2) |
| Richest | 3.7 (2.7-5.2) | 3.4 (2.2-5.2) | 2.6 (1.7-3.8) |
| No education | 1.0 | | 1.0 |
| Primary | 1.1 (0.8-1.7) | | 1.0 (0.6-1.5) |
| Secondary or Higher | 2.0 (1.6-2.5) | 1.3 (1.1-1.8) | |
Model 1=bivariate analyses.
Model 2 =Multivariate analyses of all independent variable statistically. significant at the bivariate level.
Model 3=Model 2 plus partner’s education.
Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for factors associated with delivery assisted by trained personnel among Ghanaian women in 2008
| | | | | |
| 15-24 years | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 25-34 years | 1.4 (1.1-1.7) | 1.8 (1.3-2.4) | 1.6 (1.1-2.2) | 1.6 (1.2-2.3) |
| 35-49 years | 1.0 (0.8-1.3) | 2.2 (1.4-3.2) | 2.0 (1.3-3.0) | 2.0 (1.3-3.1) |
| | | | | |
| Rural | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Urban | 6.4 (5.1-8.0) | 2.2 (1.6-3.0) | 2.3 (1.7-3.2) | 2.1 (1.5-2.9) |
| | | | | |
| 1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 2 | 0.6 (0.5-0.9) | 0.8 (0.5-1.1) | 0.8 (0.5-1.1) | 0.8 (0.5-1.2) |
| 3 | 0.4 (0.3-0.6) | 0.7 (0.5-0.9) | 0.7 (0.5-1.0) | 0.7 (0.5-1.1) |
| 4 or more | 0.2 (0.1-0.3) | 0.5 (0.3-0.7) | 0.5 (0.3-0.8) | 0.6 (0.4-0.9) |
| | | | | |
| Never married | 1.0 | | | |
| Currently married | 0.7 (0.5-1.0) | | | |
| Formerly married | 0.7 (0.4-1.2) | | | |
| | | | | |
| No education | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Primary | 2.0 (1.6-2.5) | 1.2 (0.9-1.6) | 1.2 (0.9-1.7) | 1.0 (0.8-1.4) |
| Secondary or Higher | 5.8 (4.6-7.2) | 2.1 (1.6-2.8) | 2.1 (1.5-2.8) | 1.8 (1.3-2.5) |
| | | | | |
| Traditional | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Moslem | 4.3 (2.7-6.8) | 2.1 (1.3-3.6) | 1.8 (1.1-3.2) | 1.9 (1.1-3,3) |
| Christian | 7.1 (4.7-10.9) | 2.4 (1.4-3.8) | 2.2 (1.3-3.6) | 1.8 (1.1-3.0) |
| | | | | |
| Poorest | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Poorer | 3.1 (2.4-4.1) | 2.2 (1.7-3.1) | 2.3 (1.7-3.1) | 2.1 (1.5-3.0) |
| Middle | 5.1 (3.8-6.8) | 2.4 (1.7-3.4) | 2.3 (1.6-3.3) | 2.0 (1.4-3.0) |
| Richer | 12.0 (8.7-16.5) | 4.5 (3.0-6.7) | 3.9 (2.6-5.9) | 3.5 (2.2-5.4) |
| Richest | 46.2 (27.1-78.9) | 11.1 (6.0-20.7) | 5.3 (1.7-3.2) | 8.2 (4.2-16.0) |
| | | | | |
| Late | 1.0 | | 1.0 | |
| Early | 1.8 (1.5-2.1) | | 0.8 (0.7-1.0) | |
| | | | | |
| No education | 1.0 | | | 1.0 |
| Primary | 2.0 (1.4-2.8) | | | 1.6 (1.1-2.5) |
| Secondary or Higher | 5.1 (4.1-6.4) | 1.7 (1.2-2.3) |
Model 1=bivariate analyses.
Model 2 =Multivariate analyses of all independent variable statistically significant at the bivariate level.
Model 3= Model 2 plus timing of antenatal care visits.
Model 4=Model 3 plus partner’s education.