PURPOSE: To evaluate induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (TPF) followed by surgery and postoperative radiotherapy versus up-front surgery and postoperative radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced resectable oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective open-label phase III trial was conducted. Eligibility criteria included untreated stage III or IVA locally advanced resectable OSCC. Patients received two cycles of TPF induction chemotherapy (docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, and fluorouracil 750 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 5) followed by radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy (54 to 66 Gy) versus up-front radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included local control and safety. RESULTS: Of the 256 patients enrolled onto this trial, 222 completed the full treatment protocol. There were no unexpected toxicities, and induction chemotherapy did not increase perioperative morbidity. The clinical response rate to induction chemotherapy was 80.6%. After a median follow-up of 30 months, there was no significant difference in OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.977; 95% CI, 0.634 to 1.507; P = .918) or disease-free survival (HR, 0.974; 95% CI, 0.654 to 1.45; P = .897) between patients treated with and without TPF induction. Patients in the induction chemotherapy arm with a clinical response or favorable pathologic response (≤ 10% viable tumor cells) had superior OS and locoregional and distant control. CONCLUSION: Our study failed to demonstrate that TPF induction chemotherapy improves survival compared with up-front surgery in patients with resectable stage III or IVA OSCC.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To evaluate induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (TPF) followed by surgery and postoperative radiotherapy versus up-front surgery and postoperative radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced resectable oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective open-label phase III trial was conducted. Eligibility criteria included untreated stage III or IVA locally advanced resectable OSCC. Patients received two cycles of TPF induction chemotherapy (docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, and fluorouracil 750 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 5) followed by radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy (54 to 66 Gy) versus up-front radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included local control and safety. RESULTS: Of the 256 patients enrolled onto this trial, 222 completed the full treatment protocol. There were no unexpected toxicities, and induction chemotherapy did not increase perioperative morbidity. The clinical response rate to induction chemotherapy was 80.6%. After a median follow-up of 30 months, there was no significant difference in OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.977; 95% CI, 0.634 to 1.507; P = .918) or disease-free survival (HR, 0.974; 95% CI, 0.654 to 1.45; P = .897) between patients treated with and without TPF induction. Patients in the induction chemotherapy arm with a clinical response or favorable pathologic response (≤ 10% viable tumor cells) had superior OS and locoregional and distant control. CONCLUSION: Our study failed to demonstrate that TPF induction chemotherapy improves survival compared with up-front surgery in patients with resectable stage III or IVA OSCC.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: S Temam; A Flahault; S Périé; G Monceaux; F Coulet; P Callard; J F Bernaudin; J L St Guily; P Fouret Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jochen H Lorch; Olga Goloubeva; Robert I Haddad; Kevin Cullen; Nicholas Sarlis; Roy Tishler; Ming Tan; John Fasciano; Daniel E Sammartino; Marshall R Posner Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-01-11 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: B Brockstein; D J Haraf; A W Rademaker; M S Kies; K M Stenson; F Rosen; B B Mittal; H Pelzer; B B Fung; M-E Witt; B Wenig; L Portugal; R W Weichselbaum; E E Vokes Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Federica Perrone; Paolo Bossi; Barbara Cortelazzi; Laura Locati; Pasquale Quattrone; Marco A Pierotti; Silvana Pilotti; Lisa Licitra Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-01-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kevin J Cullen; Lisa Schumaker; Nikolaos Nikitakis; Olga Goloubeva; Ming Tan; Nicholas J Sarlis; Robert I Haddad; Marshall R Posner Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-11-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Thaís Bianca Brandão; Karina Morais-Faria; Ana Carolina Prado Ribeiro; César Rivera; João Victor Salvajoli; Marcio Ajudarte Lopes; Joel B Epstein; Praveen R Arany; Gilberto de Castro; Cesar Augusto Migliorati; Alan Roger Santos-Silva Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-02-08 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: R Montal; M Oliva; M Taberna; L De Avila; A Rovira; M Cos; M Mañós; V Navarro; J Nogués; A Lozano; L Rodríguez; E Vilajosana; S Vázquez; R Mesia Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2016-03-10 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Etienne Dauzier; Benjamin Lacas; Pierre Blanchard; Quynh-Thu Le; Christian Simon; Gregory Wolf; François Janot; Masatoshi Horiuchi; Jeffrey S Tobias; James Moon; John Simes; Vinay Deshmane; Jean-Jacques Mazeron; Samir Mehta; Branko Zaktonik; Minoru Tamura; Elizabeth Moyal; Lisa Licitra; Catherine Fortpied; Bruce G Haffty; Maria Grazia Ghi; Vincent Gregoire; Jonathan Harris; Jean Bourhis; Anne Aupérin; Jean-Pierre Pignon Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2019-06-15 Impact factor: 5.337