Literature DB >> 10637254

p53 gene status as a predictor of tumor response to induction chemotherapy of patients with locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck.

S Temam1, A Flahault, S Périé, G Monceaux, F Coulet, P Callard, J F Bernaudin, J L St Guily, P Fouret.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether p53 gene status predicts tumor responses to platinum- and fluorouracil-based induction chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Tumor responses of 105 patients were measured at the primary tumor site. Objective response and major response were defined by a 50% and 80% reduction in tumor size, respectively. All coding parts of p53 gene were directly sequenced. p53 expression in tumor cells was determined by immunohistochemistry. Human papillomavirus infection was detected by polymerase chain reaction. Odd ratios were adjusted by stepwise logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: p53 mutations, p53 expression, and tumor stage were sufficient to explain the variation in tumor responses to chemotherapy in multivariate models. p53 mutation was the only variable to significantly predict objective response (odds ratio, 0. 23; 95% confidence interval, 0.10 to 0.57; P =.002) and was the strongest predictor of major response (odds ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.11 to 0.74; P =.006). p53 expression (odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.16 to 0.98) and tumor stage (odds ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.10 to 0.96) also predicted major response. Specific mutations (contact mutations) accounted for much of the reduction in the risk of major response associated with overall mutations. In complementary analyses, p53 expression was weakly predictive of major response in the subgroup with wild-type p53, and p53 mutations also predicted histologic response.
CONCLUSION: p53 gene mutations are strongly associated with a poor risk of both objective and major responses to chemotherapy. Contact mutations are associated with the lowest risk of major response to chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10637254     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.2.385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  38 in total

1.  Novel biomarker panel predicts prognosis in human papillomavirus-negative oropharyngeal cancer: an analysis of the TAX 324 trial.

Authors:  Yin Wu; Marshall R Posner; Lisa M Schumaker; Nikolaos Nikitakis; Olga Goloubeva; Ming Tan; Changwan Lu; Sana Iqbal; Jochen Lorch; Nicholas J Sarlis; Robert I Haddad; Kevin J Cullen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  p16 as a prognostic factor for the response to induction chemotherapy in advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Joon Kyoo Lee; Kyung-Hwa Lee; Sun-Ae Kim; Sun Seog Kweon; Sang-Hee Cho; Hyun-Jeong Shim; Woo-Kyun Bae; Ik-Joo Chung; Woong-Ki Chung; Tae Mi Yoon; Sang Chul Lim; Dong Hoon Lee
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Early Detection of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) - Role of Genetics: A Literature Review.

Authors:  C Seethalakshmi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-08-01

4.  Impact of EGFR and p53 expressions on survival and quality of life in locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with chemoradiation.

Authors:  Seema Gupta; Huma Khan; Vandana Singh Kushwaha; Nuzhat Husain; Mps Negi; Ashim Ghatak; Mlb Bhatt
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.742

5.  Differential biomarker expression in head and neck cancer correlates with anatomical localization.

Authors:  László Tamás; Gabriella Szentkúti; Mónika Eros; Kornél Dános; Diána Brauswetter; Béla Szende; Ivett Zsákovics; Tibor Krenács
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 6.  Lessons learned from next-generation sequencing in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Myriam Loyo; Ryan J Li; Chetan Bettegowda; Curtis R Pickering; Mitchell J Frederick; Jeffrey N Myers; Nishant Agrawal
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 7.  Molecular techniques and genetic alterations in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Patrick K Ha; Steven S Chang; Chad A Glazer; Joseph A Califano; David Sidransky
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 5.337

Review 8.  The Microenvironment of Tongue Cancer.

Authors:  Want Tao; Zeng Li-Juan; Li Kan; Li Jing-Yuan; Liu Xiang-Qi; Liang Yu-Jie
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.622

9.  Classification of TP53 mutations and HPV predict survival in advanced larynx cancer.

Authors:  Adam Scheel; Emily Bellile; Jonathan B McHugh; Heather M Walline; Mark E Prince; Susan Urba; Gregory T Wolf; Avraham Eisbruch; Francis Worden; Thomas E Carey; Carol Bradford
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Expression of p53 and Bcl-xL as predictive markers for larynx preservation in advanced laryngeal cancer.

Authors:  Bhavna Kumar; Kitrina G Cordell; Nisha D'Silva; Mark E Prince; Meredith E Adams; Susan G Fisher; Gregory T Wolf; Thomas E Carey; Carol R Bradford
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.