Literature DB >> 23129240

Developing a short-form structured diagnostic interview for common mental disorders using signal detection theory.

Matthew Sunderland1, Tim Slade, Gavin Andrews.   

Abstract

Diagnostic instruments must be relatively free from respondent burden and cost effective to administer whilst remaining faithful to the psychiatric nomenclature. It seems logical to develop short-form alternatives to rather lengthy and complicated diagnostic interviews to facilitate large scale data collection. The current study examines one method, signal detection theory, for developing a short-form interview based on the Composite International Diagnostic Interview version 3.0. The method was able to retain the smallest number of items to predict a lifetime and 30 day DSM-IV diagnosis for 10 disorders. Concordance analyses between the full-form and the short-form modules, demonstrated an excellent level of agreement in the whole sample and various subsamples of the Australian population as well as in an international comparison sample of the US population. The good concordance between the long form and the short form demonstrates the ability of signal detection theory to assist in the development of valid short forms, which could replace lengthy diagnostic interviews when the aim is to reduce respondent burden and overall research costs.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23129240      PMCID: PMC6878281          DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 1049-8931            Impact factor:   4.035


  22 in total

1.  The US National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R): design and field procedures.

Authors:  Ronald C Kessler; Patricia Berglund; Wai Tat Chiu; Olga Demler; Steven Heeringa; Eva Hiripi; Robert Jin; Beth-Ellen Pennell; Ellen E Walters; Alan Zaslavsky; Hui Zheng
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.035

2.  The World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative Version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI).

Authors:  Ronald C Kessler; T Bedirhan Ustün
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  Factors in choosing atypical antipsychotics: toward understanding the bases of physicians' prescribing decisions.

Authors:  Jennifer Hoblyn; Art Noda; Jerome A Yesavage; John O Brooks; Javaid Sheikh; Tina Lee; Jared R Tinklenberg; Bret Schneider; Ruth O'Hara; Douglas L Leslie; Robert A Rosenheck; Helena C Kraemer
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 4.791

4.  Prevalence, correlates, co-morbidity, and comparative disability of DSM-IV generalized anxiety disorder in the USA: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.

Authors:  Bridget F Grant; Deborah S Hasin; Frederick S Stinson; Deborah A Dawson; W June Ruan; Risë B Goldstein; Sharon M Smith; Tulshi D Saha; Boji Huang
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 7.723

5.  Weighted 2 x 2 kappa coefficients: recommended indices of diagnostic accuracy for evidence-based practice.

Authors:  James M Gilchrist
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Methodological approaches to shortening composite measurement scales.

Authors:  J Coste; F Guillemin; J Pouchot; J Fermanian
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Prevalence, comorbidity, disability and service utilisation. Overview of the Australian National Mental Health Survey.

Authors:  G Andrews; S Henderson; W Hall
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.319

8.  Measuring the level of diagnostic concordance and discordance between modules of the CIDI-Short Form and the CIDI-Auto 2.1.

Authors:  Matthew Sunderland; Gavin Andrews; Tim Slade; Lorna Peters
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 4.328

9.  Empirically derived decision trees for the treatment of late-life depression.

Authors:  Carmen Andreescu; Benoit H Mulsant; Patricia R Houck; Ellen M Whyte; Sati Mazumdar; Alexandre Y Dombrovski; Bruce G Pollock; Charles F Reynolds
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 18.112

10.  Reducing the probability of false positive research findings by pre-publication validation - experience with a large multiple sclerosis database.

Authors:  Martin Daumer; Ulrike Held; Katja Ickstadt; Moritz Heinz; Siegfried Schach; George Ebers
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  A Review of Scales to Measure Social Anxiety Disorder in Clinical and Epidemiological Studies.

Authors:  Quincy J J Wong; Bree Gregory; Lauren F McLellan
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  The design organization test: further demonstration of reliability and validity as a brief measure of visuospatial ability.

Authors:  William D S Killgore; Hannah Gogel
Journal:  Appl Neuropsychol Adult       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 2.248

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.