Literature DB >> 23129174

Patients' willingness to participate in a breast cancer biobank at screening mammogram.

Christoph I Lee1, Lawrence W Bassett, Mei Leng, Sally L Maliski, Bryan B Pezeshki, Colin J Wells, Carol M Mangione, Arash Naeim.   

Abstract

To characterize patients' willingness to donate a biospecimen for future research as part of a breast cancer-related biobank involving a general screening population. We performed a prospective cross-sectional study of 4,217 women aged 21-89 years presenting to our facilities for screening mammogram between December 2010 and October 2011. This HIPAA-compliant study was approved by our institutional review board. We collected data on patients' interest in and actual donation of a biospecimen, motivators and barriers to donating, demographic information, and personal breast cancer risk factors. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify patient-level characteristics associated with an increased likelihood to donate. Mean patient age was 57.8 years (SD 11.1 years). While 66.0 % (2,785/4,217) of patients were willing to donate blood or saliva during their visit, only 56.4 % (2,378/4,217) actually donated. Women with a college education (OR = 1.27, p = 0.003), older age (OR = 1.02, p < 0.001), previous breast biopsy (OR = 1.23, p = 0.012), family history of breast cancer (OR = 1.23, p = 0.004), or a comorbidity (OR = 1.22, p = 0.014) were more likely to donate. Asian-American women were significantly less likely to donate (OR = 0.74, p = 0.005). The major reason for donating was to help all future patients (42.3 %) and the major reason for declining donation was privacy concerns (22.3 %). A large proportion of women participating in a breast cancer screening registry are willing to donate blood or saliva to a biobank. Among minority participants, Asian-American women are less likely to donate and further qualitative research is required to identify novel active recruitment strategies to insure their involvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23129174      PMCID: PMC3676182          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-2324-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  43 in total

Review 1.  Genomic medicine--a primer.

Authors:  Alan E Guttmacher; Francis S Collins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-11-07       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A vision for the future of genomics research.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Eric D Green; Alan E Guttmacher; Mark S Guyer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Therapeutic misconception and the appreciation of risks in clinical trials.

Authors:  Charles W Lidz; Paul S Appelbaum; Thomas Grisso; Michelle Renaud
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Predicting intention to biobank: a national survey.

Authors:  Christine R Critchley; Dianne Nicol; Margaret F A Otlowski; Mark J A Stranger
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 3.367

5.  The ethics of research using biobanks: reason to question the importance attributed to informed consent.

Authors:  Klaus Hoeyer; Bert-Ove Olofsson; Tom Mjörndal; Niels Lynöe
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-01-10

6.  Human tissue samples and ethics--attitudes of the general public in Sweden to biobank research.

Authors:  Tore Nilstun; Göran Hermerén
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2006

7.  Promoter polymorphisms in matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors: few associations with breast cancer susceptibility and progression.

Authors:  Haixin Lei; Kari Hemminki; Andrea Altieri; Robert Johansson; Kerstin Enquist; Göran Hallmans; Per Lenner; Asta Försti
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Attitudes of patients to randomised clinical trials of cancer therapy.

Authors:  L J Fallowfield; V Jenkins; C Brennan; M Sawtell; C Moynihan; R L Souhami
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Informed consent for population-based research involving genetics.

Authors:  L M Beskow; W Burke; J F Merz; P A Barr; S Terry; V B Penchaszadeh; L O Gostin; M Gwinn; M J Khoury
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-11-14       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Vascular endothelial growth factor polymorphisms in relation to breast cancer development and prognosis.

Authors:  Qianren Jin; Kari Hemminki; Kerstin Enquist; Per Lenner; Ewa Grzybowska; Rüdiger Klaes; Roger Henriksson; Bowang Chen; Jolanta Pamula; Wioletta Pekala; Helena Zientek; Jadwiga Rogozinska-Szczepka; Beata Utracka-Hutka; Göran Hallmans; Asta Försti
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  14 in total

1.  Factors associated with willingness to participate in biospecimen research among Chinese Americans.

Authors:  Wanzhen Gao; Grace X Ma; Yin Tan; Carolyn Fang; JoEllen Weaver; Ming Jin; Philip Lai
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Factors that affect willingness to donate blood for the purpose of biospecimen research in the Korean American community.

Authors:  Glorian P Yen; Adam Davey; Grace X Ma
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  "As Long as You Ask": A Qualitative Study of Biobanking Consent-Oncology Patients' and Health Care Professionals' Attitudes, Motivations, and Experiences-the B-PPAE Study.

Authors:  Sonia Yip; Jennifer Fleming; Heather L Shepherd; Adam Walczak; Jonathan Clark; Phyllis Butow
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-11-09

4.  Race, Trust in Doctors, Privacy Concerns, and Consent Preferences for Biobanks.

Authors:  Soo Jung Hong; Bettina Drake; Melody Goodman; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2019-06-05

Review 5.  Stakeholders' perspectives on biobank-based genomic research: systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Alma Husedzinovic; Dominik Ose; Christoph Schickhardt; Stefan Fröhling; Eva C Winkler
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Engaging diverse populations about biospecimen donation for cancer research.

Authors:  Julie H T Dang; Elisa M Rodriguez; John S Luque; Deborah O Erwin; Cathy D Meade; Moon S Chen
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-03-25

7.  Oncology patients overwhelmingly support tissue banking.

Authors:  Jamie Bryant; Rob Sanson-Fisher; Elizabeth Fradgley; Timothy Regan; Breanne Hobden; Stephen P Ackland
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Utilizing SEER Cancer Registries for Population-Based Cancer Survivor Epidemiologic Studies: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Lisa Gallicchio; Joanne W Elena; Sarah Fagan; Marjorie Carter; Ann S Hamilton; Theresa A Hastert; Lisa L Hunter; Jie Li; Charles F Lynch; Joel Milam; Morgan M Millar; Denise Modjeski; Lisa E Paddock; Amanda R Reed; Lisa B Moses; Antoinette M Stroup; Carol Sweeney; Edward J Trapido; Michele M West; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Kathy J Helzlsouer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Public views on the donation and use of human biological samples in biomedical research: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Celine Lewis; Margaret Clotworthy; Shona Hilton; Caroline Magee; Mark J Robertson; Lesley J Stubbins; Julie Corfield
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Barriers to Obtaining Sera and Tissue Specimens of African-American Women for the Advancement of Cancer Research.

Authors:  Katherine J Strissel; Dequina A Nicholas; Myriam Castagne-Charlotin; Naomi Ko; Gerald V Denis
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Womens Health       Date:  2016-07-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.