Literature DB >> 9893627

Attitudes of patients to randomised clinical trials of cancer therapy.

L J Fallowfield1, V Jenkins, C Brennan, M Sawtell, C Moynihan, R L Souhami.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test an instrument which might be useful for doctors in explaining the randomisation procedure to an individual patient. The sample comprised 323 patients with cancer attending for out-patient appointments and/or chemotherapy treatment in two major cancer centres in the U.K. 315 patients completed a self-report questionnaire--The Attitudes to Randomised Trials Questionnaire (ARTQ). The results show that the majority of subjects 287 (91.1%) believe that patients should be asked to take part in medical research, but only 242 (76.8%) would be prepared to take part in a study comparing two treatments. If treatment was randomised, only 141 (44.8%) would agree to participate. When given further information about the randomisation procedure, 119 (68.4%) of the 174 (55.2%) who initially said 'no' to randomisation or who were unsure, would change their minds and take part in a trial. The ARTQ discriminated between three categories of patient with the following prevailing attitudes: (a) those who seem comfortable with the concept of randomisation; (b) those with some concerns, who with fuller explanation are prepared to consider randomisation; and (c) those firmly against randomisation and participation in trials whatever information is provided. Prior knowledge of patients' attitudes might assist communication about trials and encourage more doctors to approach eligible patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9893627     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(98)00193-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  36 in total

Review 1.  Reasons for and against participation in studies of medicinal therapies for women with breast cancer: a debate.

Authors:  Gero Luschin; Marion Habersack; Irmina-Anna Gerlich
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  BALANCE: a large simple trial of maintenance treatment for bipolar disorder.

Authors:  John R Geddes; Jennifer M Rendell; Guy M Goodwin
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 49.548

3.  Characteristics and outcomes of patients with advanced gastric cancer who declined to participate in a randomized clinical chemotherapy trial.

Authors:  Chiharu Tanai; Takako Eguchi Nakajima; Kengo Nagashima; Ken Kato; Tetsuya Hamaguchi; Yasuhide Yamada; Kei Muro; Kuniaki Shirao; Hideo Kunitoh; Yasuhiro Matsumura; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Yasuhiro Shimada
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Sharing decisions in breast cancer care: Development of the Decision Analysis System for Oncology (DAS-O) to identify shared decision making during treatment consultations.

Authors:  Richard F Brown; Phyllis N Butow; Ilona Juraskova; Karin Ribi; Daniela Gerber; Jurg Bernhard; Martin H N Tattersall
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Motivations of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension to participate in randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Ricki Carroll; Jules Antigua; Darren Taichman; Harold Palevsky; Paul Forfia; Steven Kawut; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  Attitudes towards clinical research among cancer trial participants and non-participants: an interview study using a Grounded Theory approach.

Authors:  S M Madsen; S Holm; P Riis
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Patients' perspectives on participation in clinical trials and subsequent ethical challenges in a hospital setting in Jordan.

Authors:  Lobna Gharaibeh; Hanan Sartawi; Karem Alzoubi; Tareq Juma; Diana Ayyad; Samah Sartawi
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2020-02-14

8.  Attitudinal barriers to participation in oncology clinical trials: factor analysis and correlates of barriers.

Authors:  S Manne; D Kashy; T Albrecht; Y-N Wong; A Lederman Flamm; A B Benson; S M Miller; Linda Fleisher; J Buzaglo; N Roach; M Katz; E Ross; M Collins; D Poole; S Raivitch; D M Miller; T G Kinzy; T Liu; N J Meropol
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.520

Review 9.  What do palliative care patients and their relatives think about research in palliative care?-a systematic review.

Authors:  Clare White; Janet Hardy
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Assessing an intervention to improve clinical trial perceptions among predominately African-American communities in South Carolina.

Authors:  Marvella Ford; Amy Wahlquist; Rashell Blake; CoDanielle Green; June Streets; Ebonie Fuller; Erica Johnson; Melanie Jefferson; James Etheredge; Heidi Varner; Shannon Johnson; Saundra Glover; David Turner; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2012
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.