BACKGROUND: Despite a high prevalence of distress, few physicians seek help. Earlier identification of physicians in distress has been hampered by the lack of a brief screening instrument to assess the common forms of distress. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of the seven-item Physician Well-Being Index (PWBI) to i) stratify physician well-being in several important dimensions (mental quality of life [QOL], fatigue, suicidal ideation); and ii) identify physicians whose degree of distress may negatively impact their practice (career satisfaction, intent to leave current position, medical errors). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: National sample of 6,994 U.S. physicians. MAIN MEASURES: PWBI, Mental QOL, fatigue, suicidal ideation, career satisfaction,and clinical practice measures. KEY RESULTS: Physicians with low mental QOL, high fatigue, or recent (< 12 months) suicidal ideation were more likely to endorse each of the seven PWBI items and a greater number of total items (all P < 0 .001). Assuming a prevalence of 19 %, the PWBI could reduce the post-test probability of a physician having low mental QOL to < 1 % or raise it to > 75 %. The likelihood ratio for low mental QOL among physicians with PWBI scores ≥ 4 was 3.85 in comparison to 0.33 for those with scores < 4. At a threshold score of >4, the PWBI's specificity for identifying physicians with low mental QOL, high fatigue, or recent suicidal ideation were 85.8 %. PWBI score also stratified physicians' career satisfaction, reported intent to leave current practice, and self-reported medical errors. CONCLUSIONS: The seven-item PWBI appears to be a useful screening index to identify physicians with distress in a variety of dimensions and whose degree of distress may negatively impact their practice.
BACKGROUND: Despite a high prevalence of distress, few physicians seek help. Earlier identification of physicians in distress has been hampered by the lack of a brief screening instrument to assess the common forms of distress. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of the seven-item Physician Well-Being Index (PWBI) to i) stratify physician well-being in several important dimensions (mental quality of life [QOL], fatigue, suicidal ideation); and ii) identify physicians whose degree of distress may negatively impact their practice (career satisfaction, intent to leave current position, medical errors). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: National sample of 6,994 U.S. physicians. MAIN MEASURES: PWBI, Mental QOL, fatigue, suicidal ideation, career satisfaction,and clinical practice measures. KEY RESULTS: Physicians with low mental QOL, high fatigue, or recent (< 12 months) suicidal ideation were more likely to endorse each of the seven PWBI items and a greater number of total items (all P < 0 .001). Assuming a prevalence of 19 %, the PWBI could reduce the post-test probability of a physician having low mental QOL to < 1 % or raise it to > 75 %. The likelihood ratio for low mental QOL among physicians with PWBI scores ≥ 4 was 3.85 in comparison to 0.33 for those with scores < 4. At a threshold score of >4, the PWBI's specificity for identifying physicians with low mental QOL, high fatigue, or recent suicidal ideation were 85.8 %. PWBI score also stratified physicians' career satisfaction, reported intent to leave current practice, and self-reported medical errors. CONCLUSIONS: The seven-item PWBI appears to be a useful screening index to identify physicians with distress in a variety of dimensions and whose degree of distress may negatively impact their practice.
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Charles M Balch; Gerald J Bechamps; Thomas Russell; Lotte Dyrbye; Daniel Satele; Paul Collicott; Paul J Novotny; Jeff Sloan; Julie A Freischlag Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Charles M Balch; Gerald Bechamps; Tom Russell; Lotte Dyrbye; Daniel Satele; Paul Collicott; Paul J Novotny; Jeff Sloan; Julie Freischlag Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Liselotte N Dyrbye; Alan Schwartz; Steven M Downing; Daniel W Szydlo; Jeff A Sloan; Tait D Shanafelt Journal: Acad Med Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Charles M Balch; Michael R Oreskovich; Lotte N Dyrbye; Joseph M Colaiano; Daniel V Satele; Jeff A Sloan; Tait D Shanafelt Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2011-09-03 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Sonja Boone; Litjen Tan; Lotte N Dyrbye; Wayne Sotile; Daniel Satele; Colin P West; Jeff Sloan; Michael R Oreskovich Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2012-10-08
Authors: Teresa A Rummans; Matthew M Clark; Jeff A Sloan; Marlene H Frost; John Michael Bostwick; Pamela J Atherton; Mary E Johnson; Gail Gamble; Jarrett Richardson; Paul Brown; James Martensen; Janis Miller; Katherine Piderman; Mashele Huschka; Jean Girardi; Jean Hanson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kurt Kroenke; Robert L Spitzer; Janet B W Williams; Patrick O Monahan; Bernd Löwe Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2007-03-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Alison L Chetlen; Tiffany L Chan; David H Ballard; L Alexandre Frigini; Andrea Hildebrand; Shannon Kim; James M Brian; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2018-07-31 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Vicki A Freedenberg; JiJi Jiang; Carla A Cheatham; Erica Ms Sibinga; Cynthia A Powell; Gerard R Martin; David M Steinhorn; Kathi J Kemper Journal: Glob Adv Health Med Date: 2020-09-22
Authors: Daniel S Tawfik; Jochen Profit; Timothy I Morgenthaler; Daniel V Satele; Christine A Sinsky; Liselotte N Dyrbye; Michael A Tutty; Colin P West; Tait D Shanafelt Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Krista L Kaups; Heidi Nelson; Daniel V Satele; Jeff A Sloan; Michael R Oreskovich; Lotte N Dyrbye Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 12.969