BACKGROUND: Resident well-being impacts competence, professionalism, career satisfaction, and the quality of care delivered to patients. OBJECTIVE: We established normative scores and reported evidence of relationship between the Physician Well-Being Index (PWBI) score to other variables and consequence validity for the PWBI in a national sample of residents, and evaluated the performance of the index after substituting the original fatigue item with an item not associated with driving a car. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study of a national sample of 20 475 residents. The survey included the PWBI, instruments assessing mental quality of life (QOL) and fatigue, and items on recent suicidal ideation and medical error. Fisher exact test or Wilcoxon/2-sample t test procedures were used with a 5% type I error rate and a 2-sided alternative. RESULTS: Of 7560 residents who opened the e-mail to participate in the study, 1701 (22.5%) completed the survey. Residents with low mental QOL, high fatigue, or recent suicidal ideation were more likely to endorse each of the PWBI items and a greater number of total items (all P < .001). At a threshold score of ≥ 5, the PWBI's specificity for identifying residents with low mental QOL, high fatigue, or recent suicidal ideation was 83.6%. PWBI score also stratified residents' self-reported medical errors. The PWBI performed similarly using either fatigue item. CONCLUSIONS: The 7-item PWBI appears to be a useful screening index to identify residents whose degree of distress may negatively impact the quality of care they deliver.
BACKGROUND: Resident well-being impacts competence, professionalism, career satisfaction, and the quality of care delivered to patients. OBJECTIVE: We established normative scores and reported evidence of relationship between the Physician Well-Being Index (PWBI) score to other variables and consequence validity for the PWBI in a national sample of residents, and evaluated the performance of the index after substituting the original fatigue item with an item not associated with driving a car. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study of a national sample of 20 475 residents. The survey included the PWBI, instruments assessing mental quality of life (QOL) and fatigue, and items on recent suicidal ideation and medical error. Fisher exact test or Wilcoxon/2-sample t test procedures were used with a 5% type I error rate and a 2-sided alternative. RESULTS: Of 7560 residents who opened the e-mail to participate in the study, 1701 (22.5%) completed the survey. Residents with low mental QOL, high fatigue, or recent suicidal ideation were more likely to endorse each of the PWBI items and a greater number of total items (all P < .001). At a threshold score of ≥ 5, the PWBI's specificity for identifying residents with low mental QOL, high fatigue, or recent suicidal ideation was 83.6%. PWBI score also stratified residents' self-reported medical errors. The PWBI performed similarly using either fatigue item. CONCLUSIONS: The 7-item PWBI appears to be a useful screening index to identify residents whose degree of distress may negatively impact the quality of care they deliver.
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Charles M Balch; Gerald J Bechamps; Thomas Russell; Lotte Dyrbye; Daniel Satele; Paul Collicott; Paul J Novotny; Jeff Sloan; Julie A Freischlag Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Liselotte N Dyrbye; Alan Schwartz; Steven M Downing; Daniel W Szydlo; Jeff A Sloan; Tait D Shanafelt Journal: Acad Med Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Sonja Boone; Litjen Tan; Lotte N Dyrbye; Wayne Sotile; Daniel Satele; Colin P West; Jeff Sloan; Michael R Oreskovich Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2012-10-08
Authors: Teresa A Rummans; Matthew M Clark; Jeff A Sloan; Marlene H Frost; John Michael Bostwick; Pamela J Atherton; Mary E Johnson; Gail Gamble; Jarrett Richardson; Paul Brown; James Martensen; Janis Miller; Katherine Piderman; Mashele Huschka; Jean Girardi; Jean Hanson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kurt Kroenke; Robert L Spitzer; Janet B W Williams; Patrick O Monahan; Bernd Löwe Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2007-03-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Vicki A Freedenberg; JiJi Jiang; Carla A Cheatham; Erica Ms Sibinga; Cynthia A Powell; Gerard R Martin; David M Steinhorn; Kathi J Kemper Journal: Glob Adv Health Med Date: 2020-09-22
Authors: Yoonhee Shin; Bohyun Park; Nam-Eun Kim; Eun Jeong Choi; Minsu Ock; Sun Ha Jee; Sue K Park; Hyeong Sik Ahn; Hyesook Park Journal: J Prev Med Public Health Date: 2022-05-31
Authors: Krishanu Chatterjee; Victoria S Edmonds; Marlene E Girardo; Kristin S Vickers; Julie C Hathaway; Cynthia M Stonnington Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2022-06-28 Impact factor: 3.263
Authors: Daniel S Tawfik; Jochen Profit; Timothy I Morgenthaler; Daniel V Satele; Christine A Sinsky; Liselotte N Dyrbye; Michael A Tutty; Colin P West; Tait D Shanafelt Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Vivian Obeso; Douglas Grbic; Matthew Emery; Kendra Parekh; Carrie Phillipi; Jennifer Swails; Amy Jayas; Dorothy A Andriole Journal: Med Sci Educ Date: 2021-09-10
Authors: Kurtis A Pivert; Suzanne M Boyle; Susan M Halbach; Lili Chan; Hitesh H Shah; Joshua S Waitzman; Ali Mehdi; Sayna Norouzi; Stephen M Sozio Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 10.121