Literature DB >> 23129136

The phylogenetic structure of microbial biofilms and free-living bacteria in a small stream.

Lenka Brablcová1, Iva Buriánková, Pavlína Badurová, Martin Rulík.   

Abstract

The phylogenetic composition, bacterial biomass, and biovolume of both planktonic and biofilm communities were studied in a low-order Bystřice stream near Olomouc City, in the Czech Republic. The aim of the study was to compare the microbial communities colonizing different biofilm substrata (stream aggregates, stream sediment, underwater tree roots, stream stones, and aquatic macrophytes) to those of free-living bacteria. The phylogenetic composition was analyzed using fluorescence in situ hybridization for main phylogenetic groups. All phylogenetic groups studied were detected in all sample types. The stream stone was the substratum where nearly all phylogenetic groups were the most abundant, while the lowest proportion to the DAPI-stained cells was found for free-living bacteria. The probe specific for the domain Bacteria detected 20.6 to 45.8 % of DAPI-stained cells while the probe specific for the domain Archaea detected 4.3 to 17.9 %. The most abundant group of Proteobacteria was Alphaproteobacteria with a mean of 14.2 %, and the least abundant was Betaproteobacteria with a mean of 11.4 %. The average value of the Cytophaga-Flavobacteria group was 10.5 %. Total cell numbers and bacterial biomass were highest in sediment and root biofilm. The value of cell biovolume was highest in stone biofilm and lowest in sediment. Overall, this study revealed relevant differences in phylogenetic composition, bacterial biomass, and biovolume between different stream biofilms and free-living bacteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23129136     DOI: 10.1007/s12223-012-0201-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)        ISSN: 0015-5632            Impact factor:   2.099


  35 in total

1.  Community composition of marine bacterioplankton determined by 16S rRNA gene clone libraries and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  M T Cottrell; D L Kirchman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Biofilm community structure in polluted rivers: abundance of dominant phylogenetic groups over a complete annual cycle.

Authors:  I H Brümmer; W Fehr; I Wagner-Döbler
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Phylogenetic Composition, Spatial Structure, and Dynamics of Lotic Bacterial Biofilms Investigated by Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Physiological and community responses of established grassland bacterial populations to water stress.

Authors:  Robert I Griffiths; Andrew S Whiteley; Anthony G O'Donnell; Mark J Bailey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  The ecological significance of biofilm formation by plant-associated bacteria.

Authors:  Cindy E Morris; Jean-Michel Monier
Journal:  Annu Rev Phytopathol       Date:  2003-04-29       Impact factor: 13.078

6.  Analysis of the microbial functional diversity within water-stressed soil communities by flow cytometric analysis and CTC+ cell sorting.

Authors:  Andrew S Whiteley; Robert I Griffiths; Mark J Bailey
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.363

7.  Comparison of the phenotypes and genotypes of biofilm and solitary epiphytic bacterial populations on broad-leaved endive.

Authors:  T Boureau; M A Jacques; R Berruyer; Y Dessaux; H Dominguez; C E Morris
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.552

8.  Factors influencing the detection of bacterial cells using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): A quantitative review of published reports.

Authors:  Thierry Bouvier; Paul A Del Giorgio
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 4.194

9.  Multivariate analysis of microbial communities in the River Elbe (Germany) on different phylogenetic and spatial levels of resolution.

Authors:  Frank Kloep; Werner Manz; Isolde Röske
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.194

10.  Sonication is superior to scraping for retrieval of bacteria in biofilm on titanium and steel surfaces in vitro.

Authors:  Geir Bjerkan; Eivind Witsø; Kåre Bergh
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  2 in total

1.  The impact of growth conditions on biofilm formation and the cell surface hydrophobicity in fluconazole susceptible and tolerant Candida albicans.

Authors:  Anna Kolecka; Dušan Chorvát; Helena Bujdáková
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 2.099

2.  Spatio-temporal patterns of major bacterial groups in alpine waters.

Authors:  Remo Freimann; Helmut Bürgmann; Stuart E G Findlay; Christopher T Robinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.