Literature DB >> 15259273

Comparison of the phenotypes and genotypes of biofilm and solitary epiphytic bacterial populations on broad-leaved endive.

T Boureau1, M A Jacques, R Berruyer, Y Dessaux, H Dominguez, C E Morris.   

Abstract

The discovery that biofilms are ubiquitous among the epiphytic microflora of leaves has prompted research about the impact of biofilms on the ecology of epiphytic microorganisms and on the efficiency of strategies to manage these populations for disease control and to ensure food safety. Biofilms are likely to influence the microenvironment and phenotype of the microorganisms they harbor. However, it is also important to determine whether there are differences in the types of bacteria within biofilms compared to those outside of biofilms so as to better target microorganisms via disease control strategies. Broad-leaved endive (Cichorium endivia var. latifolia) harbors biofilms containing fluorescent pseudomonads. These bacteria can cause considerable post-harvest losses when this plant is used for manufacturing minimally processed salads. To determine whether the population structure of the fluorescent pseudomonads in biofilms is different from that outside of biofilms on the same leaves, bacteria were isolated quantitatively from the biofilm and solitary components of the epiphytic population on leaves of field-grown broad-leaved endive. Population structure was determined in terms of taxonomic identities of the bacteria isolated, in terms of genotypic profiles, and in terms of phenotypic traits related to surface colonization and biofilm formation. The results illustrate that there are no systematic differences in the composition and structure of biofilm and solitary populations of fluorescent pseudomonads, in terms of either genotypic profiles or phenotypic profiles of the strains. However, Gram-positive bacteria tended to occur more frequently within biofilms than outside of biofilms. We suggest that leaf colonization by fluorescent pseudomonads involves a flux of cells between biofilm and solitary states. This would allow bacteria to exploit the advantages of these two types of existence; biofilms would favor resistance to stressful conditions, whereas solitary cells could foster spread of bacteria to newly colonizable sites on leaves as environmental conditions fluctuate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15259273     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-002-0106-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  21 in total

1.  Naturally occurring biofilms on alfalfa and other types of sprouts.

Authors:  W F Fett
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.077

2.  Population dynamics of free-floating and attached bacteria in a styrene-degrading biotrickling filter analyzed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  O Tresse; M-J Lorrain; D Rho
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2002-06-27       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Evidence of autoinducer activity in naturally occurring biofilms.

Authors:  R J McLean; M Whiteley; D J Stickler; W C Fuqua
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1997-09-15       Impact factor: 2.742

4.  Methods for observing microbial biofilms directly on leaf surfaces and recovering them for isolation of culturable microorganisms.

Authors:  C E Morris; J Monier; M Jacques
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease.

Authors:  J W Costerton; K J Cheng; G G Geesey; T I Ladd; J C Nickel; M Dasgupta; T J Marrie
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 15.500

6.  Assessment of Changes in Biodiversity when a Community of Ultramicrobacteria Isolated from Groundwater Is Stimulated to Form a Biofilm.

Authors:  N. Ross; R. Villemur; E. Marcandella; L. Deschênes
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 7.  The microbiology of minimally processed fresh fruits and vegetables.

Authors:  C Nguyen-the; F Carlin
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 11.176

8.  Detection of depolymerase isoenzymes after electrophoresis or electrofocusing, or in titration curves.

Authors:  Y Bertheau; E Madgidi-Hervan; A Kotoujansky; C Nguyen-The; T Andro; A Coleno
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.365

9.  Characterization of genes required for pilus expression in Pseudomonas syringae pathovar phaseolicola.

Authors:  E Roine; D N Nunn; L Paulin; M Romantschuk
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Cloning of pectate lyase gene pel from Pseudomonas fluorescens and detection of sequences homologous to pel in Pseudomonas viridiflava and Pseudomonas putida.

Authors:  C H Liao
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  4 in total

1.  Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli var. fuscans is aggregated in stable biofilm population sizes in the phyllosphere of field-grown beans.

Authors:  M-A Jacques; K Josi; A Darrasse; R Samson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  The phylogenetic structure of microbial biofilms and free-living bacteria in a small stream.

Authors:  Lenka Brablcová; Iva Buriánková; Pavlína Badurová; Martin Rulík
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 2.099

3.  Endopathogenic lifestyle of Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi in olive knots.

Authors:  Luis Rodríguez-Moreno; Antonio J Jiménez; Cayo Ramos
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 5.813

4.  Bean common bacterial blight: pathogen epiphytic life and effect of irrigation practices.

Authors:  Alireza Akhavan; Masoud Bahar; Homa Askarian; Mohammad Reza Lak; Abolfazl Nazemi; Zahra Zamani
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-02-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.