Literature DB >> 23128465

Fiber-optic implantation for chronic optogenetic stimulation of brain tissue.

Kevin Ung1, Benjamin R Arenkiel.   

Abstract

Elucidating patterns of neuronal connectivity has been a challenge for both clinical and basic neuroscience. Electrophysiology has been the gold standard for analyzing patterns of synaptic connectivity, but paired electrophysiological recordings can be both cumbersome and experimentally limiting. The development of optogenetics has introduced an elegant method to stimulate neurons and circuits, both in vitro(1) and in vivo(2,3). By exploiting cell-type specific promoter activity to drive opsin expression in discrete neuronal populations, one can precisely stimulate genetically defined neuronal subtypes in distinct circuits(4-6). Well described methods to stimulate neurons, including electrical stimulation and/or pharmacological manipulations, are often cell-type indiscriminate, invasive, and can damage surrounding tissues. These limitations could alter normal synaptic function and/or circuit behavior. In addition, due to the nature of the manipulation, the current methods are often acute and terminal. Optogenetics affords the ability to stimulate neurons in a relatively innocuous manner, and in genetically targeted neurons. The majority of studies involving in vivo optogenetics currently use a optical fiber guided through an implanted cannula(6,7); however, limitations of this method include damaged brain tissue with repeated insertion of an optical fiber, and potential breakage of the fiber inside the cannula. Given the burgeoning field of optogenetics, a more reliable method of chronic stimulation is necessary to facilitate long-term studies with minimal collateral tissue damage. Here we provide our modified protocol as a video article to complement the method effectively and elegantly described in Sparta et al.(8) for the fabrication of a fiber optic implant and its permanent fixation onto the cranium of anesthetized mice, as well as the assembly of the fiber optic coupler connecting the implant to a light source. The implant, connected with optical fibers to a solid-state laser, allows for an efficient method to chronically photostimulate functional neuronal circuitry with less tissue damage(9) using small, detachable, tethers. Permanent fixation of the fiber optic implants provides consistent, long-term in vivo optogenetic studies of neuronal circuits in awake, behaving mice(10) with minimal tissue damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23128465      PMCID: PMC3490315          DOI: 10.3791/50004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  10 in total

1.  Construction of implantable optical fibers for long-term optogenetic manipulation of neural circuits.

Authors:  Dennis R Sparta; Alice M Stamatakis; Jana L Phillips; Nanna Hovelsø; Ruud van Zessen; Garret D Stuber
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity.

Authors:  Edward S Boyden; Feng Zhang; Ernst Bamberg; Georg Nagel; Karl Deisseroth
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-08-14       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 3.  Genetic dissection of neural circuits.

Authors:  Liqun Luo; Edward M Callaway; Karel Svoboda
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Optogenetic interrogation of neural circuits: technology for probing mammalian brain structures.

Authors:  Feng Zhang; Viviana Gradinaru; Antoine R Adamantidis; Remy Durand; Raag D Airan; Luis de Lecea; Karl Deisseroth
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 5.  Molecular genetics and imaging technologies for circuit-based neuroanatomy.

Authors:  Benjamin R Arenkiel; Michael D Ehlers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Neural substrates of awakening probed with optogenetic control of hypocretin neurons.

Authors:  Antoine R Adamantidis; Feng Zhang; Alexander M Aravanis; Karl Deisseroth; Luis de Lecea
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  In vivo light-induced activation of neural circuitry in transgenic mice expressing channelrhodopsin-2.

Authors:  Benjamin R Arenkiel; Joao Peca; Ian G Davison; Catia Feliciano; Karl Deisseroth; George J Augustine; Michael D Ehlers; Guoping Feng
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Molecular and cellular approaches for diversifying and extending optogenetics.

Authors:  Viviana Gradinaru; Feng Zhang; Charu Ramakrishnan; Joanna Mattis; Rohit Prakash; Ilka Diester; Inbal Goshen; Kimberly R Thompson; Karl Deisseroth
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Excitatory transmission from the amygdala to nucleus accumbens facilitates reward seeking.

Authors:  Garret D Stuber; Dennis R Sparta; Alice M Stamatakis; Wieke A van Leeuwen; Juanita E Hardjoprajitno; Saemi Cho; Kay M Tye; Kimberly A Kempadoo; Feng Zhang; Karl Deisseroth; Antonello Bonci
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Optogenetic stimulation of a hippocampal engram activates fear memory recall.

Authors:  Xu Liu; Steve Ramirez; Petti T Pang; Corey B Puryear; Arvind Govindarajan; Karl Deisseroth; Susumu Tonegawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 49.962

  10 in total
  19 in total

Review 1.  Optrodes for combined optogenetics and electrophysiology in live animals.

Authors:  Suzie Dufour; Yves De Koninck
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.593

2.  In vivo optogenetic stimulation of the rodent central nervous system.

Authors:  Michelle M Sidor; Thomas J Davidson; Kay M Tye; Melissa R Warden; Karl Diesseroth; Colleen A McClung
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Chronic Transcranial Electrical Stimulation and Intracortical Recording in Rats.

Authors:  Gábor Kozák; Tamás Földi; Antal Berényi
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  A magnetic rotary optical fiber connector for optogenetic experiments in freely moving animals.

Authors:  David C Klorig; Dwayne W Godwin
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Low frequency visual stimulation enhances slow wave activity without disrupting the sleep pattern in mice.

Authors:  Stephen Thankachan; Chun Yang; Ksenia V Kastanenka; Brian J Bacskai; Dmitry Gerashchenko
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Stereotaxic Surgical Approach to Microinject the Caudal Brainstem and Upper Cervical Spinal Cord via the Cisterna Magna in Mice.

Authors:  Krutika Joshi; Alana Kirby; Jianguo Niu; Veronique VanderHorst
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 1.424

7.  Local CRH signaling promotes synaptogenesis and circuit integration of adult-born neurons.

Authors:  Isabella Garcia; Kathleen B Quast; Longwen Huang; Alexander M Herman; Jennifer Selever; Jan M Deussing; Nicholas J Justice; Benjamin R Arenkiel
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 12.270

8.  Optogenetic Food Odor Avoidance Assay.

Authors:  Jay M Patel; Jessica Swanson; Benjamin R Arenkiel
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2019-10-20

9.  Robust optical fiber patch-cords for in vivo optogenetic experiments in rats.

Authors:  Ivan Trujillo-Pisanty; Christian Sanio; Nadia Chaudhri; Peter Shizgal
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2015-05-18

10.  Tools, methods, and applications for optophysiology in neuroscience.

Authors:  Niklas Smedemark-Margulies; Josef G Trapani
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 5.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.