Literature DB >> 23127905

Application of Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and BayesCπ methods for genomic selection in French Holstein and Montbéliarde breeds.

C Colombani1, A Legarra, S Fritz, F Guillaume, P Croiseau, V Ducrocq, C Robert-Granié.   

Abstract

Recently, the amount of available single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) marker data has considerably increased in dairy cattle breeds, both for research purposes and for application in commercial breeding and selection programs. Bayesian methods are currently used in the genomic evaluation of dairy cattle to handle very large sets of explanatory variables with a limited number of observations. In this study, we applied 2 bayesian methods, BayesCπ and bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), to 2 genotyped and phenotyped reference populations consisting of 3,940 Holstein bulls and 1,172 Montbéliarde bulls with approximately 40,000 polymorphic SNP. We compared the accuracy of the bayesian methods for the prediction of 3 traits (milk yield, fat content, and conception rate) with pedigree-based BLUP, genomic BLUP, partial least squares (PLS) regression, and sparse PLS regression, a variable selection PLS variant. The results showed that the correlations between observed and predicted phenotypes were similar in BayesCπ (including or not pedigree information) and bayesian LASSO for most of the traits and whatever the breed. In the Holstein breed, bayesian methods led to higher correlations than other approaches for fat content and were similar to genomic BLUP for milk yield and to genomic BLUP and PLS regression for the conception rate. In the Montbéliarde breed, no method dominated the others, except BayesCπ for fat content. The better performances of the bayesian methods for fat content in Holstein and Montbéliarde breeds are probably due to the effect of the DGAT1 gene. The SNP identified by the BayesCπ, bayesian LASSO, and sparse PLS regression methods, based on their effect on the different traits of interest, were located at almost the same position on the genome. As the bayesian methods resulted in regressions of direct genomic values on daughter trait deviations closer to 1 than for the other methods tested in this study, bayesian methods are suggested for genomic evaluations of French dairy cattle.
Copyright © 2013 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23127905     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-5225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  23 in total

1.  Genome-Wide Association Analyses Based on Broadly Different Specifications for Prior Distributions, Genomic Windows, and Estimation Methods.

Authors:  Chunyu Chen; Juan P Steibel; Robert J Tempelman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Walking through the statistical black boxes of plant breeding.

Authors:  Alencar Xavier; William M Muir; Bruce Craig; Katy Martin Rainey
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Genomic Prediction of Complex Traits in Animal Breeding with Long Breeding History, the Dairy Cattle Case.

Authors:  Joel Ira Weller
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

4.  Developing Multivariable Normal Tissue Complication Probability Model to Predict the Incidence of Symptomatic Radiation Pneumonitis among Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Tsair-Fwu Lee; Pei-Ju Chao; Liyun Chang; Hui-Min Ting; Yu-Jie Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Methods to address poultry robustness and welfare issues through breeding and associated ethical considerations.

Authors:  William M Muir; Heng-Wei Cheng; Candace Croney
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Using multivariate regression model with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) to predict the incidence of Xerostomia after intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Tsair-Fwu Lee; Pei-Ju Chao; Hui-Min Ting; Liyun Chang; Yu-Jie Huang; Jia-Ming Wu; Hung-Yu Wang; Mong-Fong Horng; Chun-Ming Chang; Jen-Hong Lan; Ya-Yu Huang; Fu-Min Fang; Stephen Wan Leung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Accuracy of genomic predictions in Bos indicus (Nellore) cattle.

Authors:  Haroldo H R Neves; Roberto Carvalheiro; Ana M Pérez O'Brien; Yuri T Utsunomiya; Adriana S do Carmo; Flávio S Schenkel; Johann Sölkner; John C McEwan; Curtis P Van Tassell; John B Cole; Marcos V G B da Silva; Sandra A Queiroz; Tad S Sonstegard; José Fernando Garcia
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 4.297

8.  Accuracy of genomic prediction for growth and carcass traits in Chinese triple-yellow chickens.

Authors:  Tianfei Liu; Hao Qu; Chenglong Luo; Dingming Shu; Jie Wang; Mogens Sandø Lund; Guosheng Su
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.797

9.  Improving the prediction of going concern of Taiwanese listed companies using a hybrid of LASSO with data mining techniques.

Authors:  Yeung-Ja James Goo; Der-Jang Chi; Zong-De Shen
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-04-27

10.  Dissimilarity based Partial Least Squares (DPLS) for genomic prediction from SNPs.

Authors:  Priyanka Singh; Jasper Engel; Jeroen Jansen; Jorn de Haan; Lutgarde Maria Celina Buydens
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.