Literature DB >> 23127896

Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate.

Michael Robson1, Lucia Hartigan, Martina Murphy.   

Abstract

Caesarean section rates continue to increase worldwide. The appropriate caesarean section rate remains a topic of debate among women and professionals. Evidence-based medicine has not provided an answer and depends on interpretation of the literature. Overall caesarean section rates are unhelpful, and caesarean section rates should not be judged in isolation from other outcomes and epidemiological characteristics. Better understanding of caesarean section rates, their consequences and their benefits will improve care, and enable learning between delivery units nationally and internationally. To achieve and maintain an appropriate caesarean section rate requires a Multidisciplinary Quality Assurance Programme in each delivery unit, recognising caesarean section rates as one of many factors that determine quality. Women will always choose the type of delivery that seems safest to them and their babies. Professionals need to monitor the quality of their practice continuously in a standardised way to ensure that women can make the right choice.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23127896     DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 1521-6934            Impact factor:   5.237


  39 in total

1.  Caesarean deliveries in the Mother-Child (Rhea) cohort in Crete, Greece: almost as frequent as vaginal births and even more common in first-time mothers.

Authors:  M Vassilaki; L Chatzi; M Rasidaki; E Bagkeris; G Kritsotakis; T Roumeliotaki; A Koutis; A Philalithis; M Kogevinas
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.471

2.  Caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System: a population-based birth cohort study.

Authors:  Mohammed Walid Zimmo; Katariina Laine; Sahar Hassan; Bettina Bottcher; Erik Fosse; Hadil Ali-Masri; Kaled Zimmo; Ragnhild Sørum Falk; Marit Lieng; Åse Vikanes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Trend Prediction for Cesarean Deliveries Based on Robson Classification System at a Tertiary Referral Unit of North India.

Authors:  Pratima Mittal; Divya Pandey; Jyotsna Suri; Rekha Bharti
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2019-10-11

4.  Trend and Sociodemographic Correlates of Cesarean Section Utilization in Nepal: Evidence from Demographic and Health Surveys 2006-2016.

Authors:  Kiran Acharya; Yuba Raj Paudel
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Risk-adjusted operative delivery rates and maternal-neonatal outcomes as measures of quality assessment in obstetric care: a multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  Gianpaolo Maso; Lorenzo Monasta; Monica Piccoli; Luca Ronfani; Marcella Montico; Francesco De Seta; Sara Parolin; Caterina Businelli; Laura Travan; Salvatore Alberico
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Interinstitutional variation of caesarean delivery rates according to indications in selected obstetric populations: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Gianpaolo Maso; Monica Piccoli; Marcella Montico; Lorenzo Monasta; Luca Ronfani; Sara Parolin; Carmine Gigli; Daniele Domini; Claudio Fiscella; Sara Casarsa; Carlo Zompicchiatti; Michela De Agostini; Attilio D'Atri; Raffaela Mugittu; Santo La Valle; Cristina Di Leonardo; Valter Adamo; Mara Fracas; Giovanni Del Frate; Monica Olivuzzi; Silvio Giove; Maria Parente; Daniele Bassini; Simona Melazzini; Secondo Guaschino; Caterina Businelli; Franco G Toffoletti; Diego Marchesoni; Alberto Rossi; Sergio Demarini; Laura Travan; Giorgio Simon; Sandro Zicari; Giorgio Tamburlini; Salvatore Alberico
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Maternal clinical diagnoses and hospital variation in the risk of cesarean delivery: analyses of a National US Hospital Discharge Database.

Authors:  Katy B Kozhimannil; Mariana C Arcaya; S V Subramanian
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Variation in hospital caesarean section rates for women with at least one previous caesarean section: a population based cohort study.

Authors:  Kathrin Schemann; Jillian A Patterson; Tanya A Nippita; Jane B Ford; Christine L Roberts
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 9.  What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies.

Authors:  Ana Pilar Betran; Maria Regina Torloni; Jun Zhang; Jiangfeng Ye; Rafael Mikolajczyk; Catherine Deneux-Tharaux; Olufemi Taiwo Oladapo; João Paulo Souza; Özge Tunçalp; Joshua Peter Vogel; Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 10.  A systematic review of the Robson classification for caesarean section: what works, doesn't work and how to improve it.

Authors:  Ana Pilar Betrán; Nadia Vindevoghel; Joao Paulo Souza; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Maria Regina Torloni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.