BACKGROUND: The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) has been used widely as a cognitive end point in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) clinical trials. Efforts to treat AD pathology at earlier stages have also used ADAS-Cog, but failure in these trials can be difficult to interpret because the scale has well-known ceiling effects that limit its use in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early AD. A wealth of data exists in ADAS-Cog from both historical trials and contemporary longitudinal natural history studies that can provide insights about parts of the scale that may be better suited for MCI and early AD trials. METHODS: Using Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study data, we identified the most informative cognitive measures from the ADAS-Cog and other available scales. We used cross-sectional analyses to characterize trajectories of ADAS-Cog and its individual subscales, as well as other cognitive, functional, or global measures across disease stages. Informative measures were identified based on standardized mean of 2-year change from baseline and were combined into novel composite endpoints. We assessed performance of the novel endpoints based on sample size requirements for a 2-year clinical trial. A bootstrap validation procedure was also undertaken to assess the reproducibility of the standardized mean changes of the selected measures and the corresponding composites. RESULTS: All proposed novel endpoints have improved standardized mean changes and thus improved statistical power compared with the ADAS-Cog 11. Further improvements were achieved by using cognitive-functional composites. Combining the novel composites with an enrichment strategy based on cerebral spinal fluid beta-amyloid (Aβ(1-42)) in a 2-year trial yielded gains in power of 20% to 40% over ADAS-Cog 11, regardless of the novel measure considered. CONCLUSION: An empirical, data-driven approach with existing instruments was used to derive novel composite scales based on ADAS-Cog 11 with improved performance characteristics for MCI and early AD clinical trials. Together with patient enrichment based on Aβ(1-42) pathology, these modified endpoints may allow more efficient clinical trials in these populations and can be assessed without modifying current test administration procedures in ongoing trials.
BACKGROUND: The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) has been used widely as a cognitive end point in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) clinical trials. Efforts to treat AD pathology at earlier stages have also used ADAS-Cog, but failure in these trials can be difficult to interpret because the scale has well-known ceiling effects that limit its use in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early AD. A wealth of data exists in ADAS-Cog from both historical trials and contemporary longitudinal natural history studies that can provide insights about parts of the scale that may be better suited for MCI and early AD trials. METHODS: Using Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study data, we identified the most informative cognitive measures from the ADAS-Cog and other available scales. We used cross-sectional analyses to characterize trajectories of ADAS-Cog and its individual subscales, as well as other cognitive, functional, or global measures across disease stages. Informative measures were identified based on standardized mean of 2-year change from baseline and were combined into novel composite endpoints. We assessed performance of the novel endpoints based on sample size requirements for a 2-year clinical trial. A bootstrap validation procedure was also undertaken to assess the reproducibility of the standardized mean changes of the selected measures and the corresponding composites. RESULTS: All proposed novel endpoints have improved standardized mean changes and thus improved statistical power compared with the ADAS-Cog 11. Further improvements were achieved by using cognitive-functional composites. Combining the novel composites with an enrichment strategy based on cerebral spinal fluid beta-amyloid (Aβ(1-42)) in a 2-year trial yielded gains in power of 20% to 40% over ADAS-Cog 11, regardless of the novel measure considered. CONCLUSION: An empirical, data-driven approach with existing instruments was used to derive novel composite scales based on ADAS-Cog 11 with improved performance characteristics for MCI and early ADclinical trials. Together with patient enrichment based on Aβ(1-42) pathology, these modified endpoints may allow more efficient clinical trials in these populations and can be assessed without modifying current test administration procedures in ongoing trials.
Authors: R C Mohs; D Knopman; R C Petersen; S H Ferris; C Ernesto; M Grundman; M Sano; L Bieliauskas; D Geldmacher; C Clark; L J Thal Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 1997 Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Mike R Schoenberg; Kyra A Dawson; Kevin Duff; Doyle Patton; James G Scott; Russell L Adams Journal: Arch Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2006-09-20 Impact factor: 2.813
Authors: M C Donohue; A C Gamst; R G Thomas; R Xu; L Beckett; R C Petersen; M W Weiner; P Aisen Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2011-04-30 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Stefan J Cano; Holly B Posner; Margaret L Moline; Stephen W Hurt; Jina Swartz; Tim Hsu; Jeremy C Hobart Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2010-09-29 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Leslie M Shaw; Hugo Vanderstichele; Malgorzata Knapik-Czajka; Christopher M Clark; Paul S Aisen; Ronald C Petersen; Kaj Blennow; Holly Soares; Adam Simon; Piotr Lewczuk; Robert Dean; Eric Siemers; William Potter; Virginia M-Y Lee; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Rochelle E Tractenberg; Myron F Weiner; Marian B Patterson; Anthony Gamst; Leon J Thal Journal: J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol Date: 2002 Impact factor: 2.680
Authors: Jessica B Langbaum; Suzanne B Hendrix; Napatkamon Ayutyanont; Kewei Chen; Adam S Fleisher; Raj C Shah; Lisa L Barnes; David A Bennett; Pierre N Tariot; Eric M Reiman Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2014-04-21 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: A M Wessels; E R Siemers; P Yu; S W Andersen; K C Holdridge; J R Sims; K Sundell; Y Stern; D M Rentz; B Dubois; R W Jones; J Cummings; P S Aisen Journal: J Prev Alzheimers Dis Date: 2015-12-01
Authors: Jesse M Cedarbaum; Diane Stephenson; Richard Rudick; Maria C Carrillo; Glenn Stebbins; Douglas Kerr; Jill Heemskerk; Wendy R Galpern; Petra Kaufmann; David Cella; Maria Isaac; Marc K Walton Journal: Neurotherapeutics Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 7.620
Authors: Holly Posner; Rosie Curiel; Chris Edgar; Suzanne Hendrix; Enchi Liu; David A Loewenstein; Glenn Morrison; Leslie Shinobu; Keith Wesnes; Philip D Harvey Journal: Innov Clin Neurosci Date: 2017-02-01
Authors: B Vellas; R Bateman; K Blennow; G Frisoni; K Johnson; R Katz; J Langbaum; D Marson; R Sperling; A Wessels; S Salloway; R Doody; P Aisen Journal: J Prev Alzheimers Dis Date: 2015-06