Literature DB >> 23126346

Impact of the number of blood pressure measurements on blood pressure classification in US adults: NHANES 1999-2008.

Joel Handler1, Yumin Zhao, Brent M Egan.   

Abstract

Clinical guidelines recommend averaging ≥ 2 blood pressure (BP) measurements on each visit. Only one BP is measured on many clinical visits, especially if the value is <120/<80 mm Hg, ie, normal. The impact of this practice on accurate assignment of BP category is incompletely defined. Data were analyzed from 22,641 adults 18 years and older who had 3 BP readings in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 1999-2008. BP category defined by initial measurement was compared with the category determined by mean of the first and second, first through third, and second and third readings. Among 8553 nonhypertensive patients with initial BP <120/<80 mm Hg, 2.9%, 3.3%, and 6.7%, respectively, were reclassified as prehypertensive, ie, BP 120-139/80-89 mm Hg, and two patients as stage 1 hypertension (140-159/90-99 mm Hg). In 733 treated hypertensive patients with initial BP <120/<80 mm Hg, 5.1%-8.9% were reclassified as prehypertensive and only one patient as hypertensive. Among nonhypertensive and hypertensive patients with initial BP in the prehypertensive range, 8.0%-23.6% were reclassified as normal. Among stage 1 and 2 hypertensive patients based on initial BP, 18.2%-33.5% were reclassified to lower BP categories. By multivariable logistic regression, older age and higher systolic and diastolic BP were associated with reclassification to a lower BP category. In nonhypertensive and hypertensive patients with normal initial BP values, one BP measurement appears adequate as <10% are re-classified as prehypertensive and <0.5% as hypertensive. In contrast, patients with an initial BP above normal are often reclassified to a lower category, which supports recommendations for additional measurements.
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23126346      PMCID: PMC3491581          DOI: 10.1111/jch.12009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  24 in total

1.  US trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, 1988-2008.

Authors:  Brent M Egan; Yumin Zhao; R Neal Axon
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The effects of talking, reading, and silence on the "white coat" phenomenon in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  C Le Pailleur; G Helft; P Landais; P Montgermont; J M Feder; J P Metzger; A Vacheron
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.689

3.  Alerting reaction and rise in blood pressure during measurement by physician and nurse.

Authors:  G Mancia; G Parati; G Pomidossi; G Grassi; R Casadei; A Zanchetti
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  Terminal digit preference, random error, and bias in routine clinical measurement of blood pressure.

Authors:  S W Wen; M S Kramer; J Hoey; J A Hanley; R H Usher
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 5.  Blood pressure trends with aging.

Authors:  J M Kotchen; H E McKean; T A Kotchen
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1982 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  Blood pressure determination by traditionally trained personnel is less reliable and tends to underestimate the severity of moderate to severe hypertension.

Authors:  Weranuj Roubsanthisuk; Unticha Wongsurin; Surachai Saravich; Peera Buranakitjaroen
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.444

7.  Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension among United States adults 1999-2004.

Authors:  Kwok Leung Ong; Bernard M Y Cheung; Yu Bun Man; Chu Pak Lau; Karen S L Lam
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 10.190

8.  Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the United States, 1988-2000.

Authors:  Ihab Hajjar; Theodore A Kotchen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-07-09       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Evaluation of the modification of diet in renal disease study equation in a large diverse population.

Authors:  Lesley A Stevens; Josef Coresh; Harold I Feldman; Tom Greene; James P Lash; Robert G Nelson; Mahboob Rahman; Amy E Deysher; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Christopher H Schmid; Andrew S Levey
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 10.121

10.  The importance of accurate blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  Joel Handler
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2009
View more
  27 in total

1.  The RICH LIFE Project: A cluster randomized pragmatic trial comparing the effectiveness of health system only vs. health system Plus a collaborative/stepped care intervention to reduce hypertension disparities.

Authors:  Lisa A Cooper; Jill A Marsteller; Kathryn A Carson; Katherine B Dietz; Romsai T Boonyasai; Carmen Alvarez; Chidinma A Ibe; Deidra C Crews; Hsin-Chieh Yeh; Edgar R Miller; Cheryl R Dennison-Himmelfarb; Lisa H Lubomski; Tanjala S Purnell; Felicia Hill-Briggs; Nae-Yuh Wang
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Blood pressure and cholesterol control in hypertensive hypercholesterolemic patients: national health and nutrition examination surveys 1988-2010.

Authors:  Brent M Egan; Jiexiang Li; Suparna Qanungo; Tamara E Wolfman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Automated Office-Based Blood Pressure Measurement: an Overview and Guidance for Implementation in Primary Care.

Authors:  Romsai T Boonyasai; Erika L McCannon; Joseph E Landavaso
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 5.369

4.  Evaluation of high blood pressure and obesity among US coal miners participating in the Enhanced Coal Workers' Health Surveillance Program.

Authors:  Megan Lauren Casey; Kathleen B Fedan; Nicole Edwards; David J Blackley; Cara N Halldin; Anita L Wolfe; Anthony Scott Laney
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2017-06-20

5.  Impact of repeated blood pressure measurement on blood pressure categorization in a population-based study from India.

Authors:  Arun Pulikkottil Jose; Ashish Awasthi; Dimple Kondal; Mudit Kapoor; Ambuj Roy; Dorairaj Prabhakaran
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 3.012

6.  Prevalence of pseudoresistant hypertension due to inaccurate blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  Hemal Bhatt; Mohammed Siddiqui; Eric Judd; Suzanne Oparil; David Calhoun
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2016-03-30

Review 7.  Integrating Out-of-Office Blood Pressure in the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertension.

Authors:  Jordana B Cohen; Debbie L Cohen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Unattended automated office blood pressure measurement: Time efficiency and barriers to implementation/utilization.

Authors:  John Doane; Michael Flynn; Marcus Archibald; Dominick Ramirez; Molly B Conroy; Barry Stults
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Independent predictors of effective blood pressure control in patients with hypertension on drug treatment in Brazil.

Authors:  Francisco Flavio Costa Filho; Ari Timerman; Jose Francisco Kerr Saraiva; Carlos Costa Magalhaes; Ibraim Masciarelli F Pinto; Gustavo B F Oliveira; Antonio Cordeiro Mattos; Alvaro Avezum
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Measure accurately, Act rapidly, and Partner with patients: An intuitive and practical three-part framework to guide efforts to improve hypertension control.

Authors:  Romsai T Boonyasai; Michael K Rakotz; Lisa H Lubomski; Donna M Daniel; Jill A Marsteller; Kathryn S Taylor; Lisa A Cooper; Omar Hasan; Matthew K Wynia
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.