Literature DB >> 23125279

The STarT back screening tool and individual psychological measures: evaluation of prognostic capabilities for low back pain clinical outcomes in outpatient physical therapy settings.

Jason M Beneciuk1, Mark D Bishop, Julie M Fritz, Michael E Robinson, Nabih R Asal, Anne N Nisenzon, Steven Z George.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Psychologically informed practice emphasizes routine identification of modifiable psychological risk factors being highlighted.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the predictive validity of the STarT Back Screening Tool (SBT) in comparison with single-construct psychological measures for 6-month clinical outcomes.
DESIGN: This was an observational, prospective cohort study.
METHODS: Patients (n=146) receiving physical therapy for low back pain were administered the SBT and a battery of psychological measures (Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire physical activity scale and work scale [FABQ-PA and FABQ-W, respectively], Pain Catastrophizing Scale [PCS], 11-item version of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia [TSK-11], and 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]) at initial evaluation and 4 weeks later. Treatment was at the physical therapist's discretion. Clinical outcomes consisted of pain intensity and self-reported disability. Prediction of 6-month clinical outcomes was assessed for intake SBT and psychological measure scores using multiple regression models while controlling for other prognostic variables. In addition, the predictive capabilities of intake to 4-week changes in SBT and psychological measure scores for 6-month clinical outcomes were assessed.
RESULTS: Intake pain intensity scores (β=.39 to .45) and disability scores (β=.47 to .60) were the strongest predictors in all final regression models, explaining 22% and 24% and 43% and 48% of the variance for the respective clinical outcome at 6 months. Neither SBT nor psychological measure scores improved prediction of 6-month pain intensity. The SBT overall scores (β=.22) and SBT psychosocial scores (β=.25) added to the prediction of disability at 6 months. Four-week changes in TSK-11 scores (β=-.18) were predictive of pain intensity at 6 months. Four-week changes in FABQ-PA scores (β=-.21), TSK-11 scores (β=-.20) and SBT overall scores (β=-.18) were predictive of disability at 6 months. LIMITATIONS: Physical therapy treatment was not standardized or accounted for in the analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Prediction of clinical outcomes by psychology-based measures was dependent upon the clinical outcome domain of interest. Similar to studies from the primary care setting, initial screening with the SBT provided additional prognostic information for 6-month disability and changes in SBT overall scores may provide important clinical decision-making information for treatment monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23125279      PMCID: PMC3588106          DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20120207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  68 in total

Review 1.  Clinical prediction rules for physical therapy interventions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jason M Beneciuk; Mark D Bishop; Steven Z George
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2008-12-18

2.  Prevalence of chronic pain in a representative sample in the United States.

Authors:  Jochen Hardt; Clemma Jacobsen; Jack Goldberg; Ralf Nickel; Dedra Buchwald
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 3.750

3.  Predictors of physical therapy clinic performance in the treatment of patients with low back pain syndromes.

Authors:  Linda Resnik; Dawei Liu; Vince Mor; Dennis L Hart
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2008-08-08

Review 4.  A systematic review of the predictive ability of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire.

Authors:  Rowena L Hockings; James H McAuley; Christopher G Maher
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The rising prevalence of chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Janet K Freburger; George M Holmes; Robert P Agans; Anne M Jackman; Jane D Darter; Andrea S Wallace; Liana D Castel; William D Kalsbeek; Timothy S Carey
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-02-09

6.  A primary care back pain screening tool: identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment.

Authors:  Jonathan C Hill; Kate M Dunn; Martyn Lewis; Ricky Mullis; Chris J Main; Nadine E Foster; Elaine M Hay
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2008-05-15

7.  Predicting outcome in acute low back pain using different models of patient profiling.

Authors:  Benedict M Wand; James H McAuley; Louise Marston; Lorraine H De Souza
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Screening for elevated levels of fear-avoidance beliefs regarding work or physical activities in people receiving outpatient therapy.

Authors:  Dennis L Hart; Mark W Werneke; Steven Z George; James W Matheson; Ying-Chih Wang; Karon F Cook; Jerome E Mioduski; Seung W Choi
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2009-06-18

9.  Self-management practices among primary care patients with musculoskeletal pain and depression.

Authors:  Teresa M Damush; Jingwei Wu; Matthew J Bair; Jason M Sutherland; Kurt Kroenke
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2008-06-14

10.  A randomised clinical trial of subgrouping and targeted treatment for low back pain compared with best current care. The STarT Back Trial Study Protocol.

Authors:  Elaine M Hay; Kate M Dunn; Jonathan C Hill; Martyn Lewis; Elizabeth E Mason; Kika Konstantinou; Gail Sowden; Simon Somerville; Kanchan Vohora; David Whitehurst; Chris J Main
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  64 in total

1.  The predictive ability of the STarT Back Screening Tool in a Danish secondary care setting.

Authors:  Lars Morsø; Peter Kent; Claus Manniche; Hanne B Albert
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The demographics of pain catastrophizing in a primary care sample.

Authors:  Randy A Sansone; Daron A Watts; Michael W Wiederman
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2013-09

3.  Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome (OSPRO) for Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions: Results From the Validation Cohort.

Authors:  Steven Z George; Jason M Beneciuk; Trevor A Lentz; Samuel S Wu; Yunfeng Dai; Joel E Bialosky; Giorgio Zeppieri
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 4.751

4.  Subgrouping for patients with low back pain: a multidimensional approach incorporating cluster analysis and the STarT Back Screening Tool.

Authors:  Jason M Beneciuk; Michael E Robinson; Steven Z George
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 5.  Artificial intelligence to improve back pain outcomes and lessons learnt from clinical classification approaches: three systematic reviews.

Authors:  Scott D Tagliaferri; Maia Angelova; Xiaohui Zhao; Patrick J Owen; Clint T Miller; Tim Wilkin; Daniel L Belavy
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-07-09

6.  Report of the NIH Task Force on research standards for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Richard A Deyo; Samuel F Dworkin; Dagmar Amtmann; Gunnar Andersson; David Borenstein; Eugene Carragee; John Carrino; Roger Chou; Karon Cook; Anthony Delitto; Christine Goertz; Partap Khalsa; John Loeser; Sean Mackey; James Panagis; James Rainville; Tor Tosteson; Dennis Turk; Michael Von Korff; Debra K Weiner
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2015-02

7.  Invited commentary on 'different minimal clinically important difference (MCID) scores lead to different clinical prediction rules for the Oswestry disability index when using the same sample of patients'.

Authors:  Steven Z George
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2013-05

8.  Report of the NIH Task Force on research standards for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Richard A Deyo; Samuel F Dworkin; Dagmar Amtmann; Gunnar Andersson; David Borenstein; Eugene Carragee; John Carrino; Roger Chou; Karon Cook; Anthony DeLitto; Christine Goertz; Partap Khalsa; John Loeser; Sean Mackey; James Panagis; James Rainville; Tor Tosteson; Dennis Turk; Michael Von Korff; Debra K Weiner
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 5.820

9.  Kinesiophobia modulates lumbar movements in people with chronic low back pain: a kinematic analysis of lumbar bending and returning movement.

Authors:  Michihiro Osumi; Masahiko Sumitani; Yuko Otake; Tomohiko Nishigami; Akira Mibu; Yuki Nishi; Ryota Imai; Gosuke Sato; Yusuke Nagakura; Shu Morioka
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Psychometric Evaluation of the Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag (OSPRO-YF) Tool: Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity.

Authors:  Katie A Butera; Steven Z George; Trevor A Lentz
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.820

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.