Literature DB >> 23124824

Relationship Stability through Lenses of Complexity.

Gunnur Karakurt1.   

Abstract

Research on relationship stability usually considers the effect of couple outcomes and individual differences on relationship stability in isolation from each other. These separate bodies of research often lead to inconsistent results. In order to better understand relationship stability and explain inconsistencies in the literature, it is important to investigate more complex models that integrate couple outcomes and behaviors with individual differences. Motivated by these considerations, we examined the complex interplay between personal characteristics, couple interactions, and relationship stability. In particular, we investigated the relationships among investment model, big five personality traits, attachment dimensions, relationship factors and relationship stability. Participants of this study included 162 individuals (Female N=117) who are currently in a relationship from a large Midwestern university campus. Analyses were conducted using Structural Equation Modeling. Examination of the structural path parameters indicated that attachment had significant direct effect on personality, relationship factors, and relationship stability. Personality also had a significant direct effect on relationship stability. Finally personality had no direct effect on relationship factors and relationship factors had no direct effect on relationship stability. These results suggest that the effect of personality on relationship stability is direct, rather than being mediated by relationship factors.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23124824      PMCID: PMC3485395          DOI: 10.1080/01926187.2011.586619

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Fam Ther        ISSN: 0192-6187


  11 in total

1.  Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships.

Authors:  J Wieselquist; C E Rusbult; C A Foster; C R Agnew
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-11

2.  Substituting the forest for the trees: social networks and the prediction of romantic relationship state and fate.

Authors:  C R Agnew; T J Loving; S M Drigotas
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2001-12

Review 3.  Seventy years of research on personality and close relationships: substantive and methodological trends over time.

Authors:  M Lynne Cooper; Melanie Skaggs Sheldon
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  2002-12

4.  It's not just who you're with, it's who you are: personality and relationship experiences across multiple relationships.

Authors:  Richard W Robins; Avshalom Caspi; Terrie E Moffitt
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  2002-12

5.  Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: behavior, physiology, and health.

Authors:  J M Gottman; R W Levenson
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1992-08

Review 6.  The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: a review of theory, method, and research.

Authors:  B R Karney; T N Bradbury
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  "I love you more today than yesterday": romantic partners' perceptions of changes in love and related affect over time.

Authors:  S Sprecher
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-01

8.  The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: love is not blind, but prescient.

Authors:  S L Murray; J G Holmes; D W Griffin
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1996-12

9.  Personality and compatibility: a prospective analysis of marital stability and marital satisfaction.

Authors:  E L Kelly; J J Conley
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1987-01

10.  Attachment style, gender, and relationship stability: a longitudinal analysis.

Authors:  L A Kirkpatrick; K E Davis
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1994-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.