OBJECTIVE: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) and pain are assumed to be barriers to meeting physical activity guidelines, but this has not been formally evaluated. The purpose of this study was to determine the proportions of people with and those without knee OA and knee pain who meet recommended physical activity levels through walking. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of community-dwelling adults from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study who had or who were at high risk of knee OA. Participants wore a StepWatch activity monitor to record steps per day for 7 days. The proportion of participants who met the recommended physical activity levels was defined as those accumulating≥150 minutes per week at ≥100 steps per minute in bouts lasting ≥10 minutes. These proportions were also determined for those with and those without knee OA, as classified by radiography and by severity of knee pain. RESULTS: Of the 1,788 study participants (mean±SD age 67.2±7.7 years, mean±SD body mass index 30.7±6.0 kg/m2, 60% women), lower overall percentages of participants with radiographic knee OA and knee pain met recommended physical activity levels. However, these differences were not statistically significant between those with and those without knee OA; 7.3% and 10.1% of men (P=0.34) and 6.3% and 7.8% of women (P=0.51), respectively, met recommended physical activity levels. Similarly, for those with moderate/severe knee pain and those with no knee pain, 12.9% and 10.9% of men (P=0.74) and 6.7% and 11.0% of women (P=0.40), respectively, met recommended physical activity levels. CONCLUSION: Disease and pain have little impact on achieving recommended physical activity levels among people with or at high risk of knee OA.
OBJECTIVE:Knee osteoarthritis (OA) and pain are assumed to be barriers to meeting physical activity guidelines, but this has not been formally evaluated. The purpose of this study was to determine the proportions of people with and those without knee OA and knee pain who meet recommended physical activity levels through walking. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of community-dwelling adults from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study who had or who were at high risk of knee OA. Participants wore a StepWatch activity monitor to record steps per day for 7 days. The proportion of participants who met the recommended physical activity levels was defined as those accumulating≥150 minutes per week at ≥100 steps per minute in bouts lasting ≥10 minutes. These proportions were also determined for those with and those without knee OA, as classified by radiography and by severity of knee pain. RESULTS: Of the 1,788 study participants (mean±SD age 67.2±7.7 years, mean±SD body mass index 30.7±6.0 kg/m2, 60% women), lower overall percentages of participants with radiographic knee OA and knee pain met recommended physical activity levels. However, these differences were not statistically significant between those with and those without knee OA; 7.3% and 10.1% of men (P=0.34) and 6.3% and 7.8% of women (P=0.51), respectively, met recommended physical activity levels. Similarly, for those with moderate/severe knee pain and those with no knee pain, 12.9% and 10.9% of men (P=0.74) and 6.7% and 11.0% of women (P=0.40), respectively, met recommended physical activity levels. CONCLUSION: Disease and pain have little impact on achieving recommended physical activity levels among people with or at high risk of knee OA.
Authors: Carol Ewing Garber; Bryan Blissmer; Michael R Deschenes; Barry A Franklin; Michael J Lamonte; I-Min Lee; David C Nieman; David P Swain Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Stephen P Messier; Richard F Loeser; Gary D Miller; Timothy M Morgan; W Jack Rejeski; Mary Ann Sevick; Walter H Ettinger; Marco Pahor; Jeff D Williamson Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2004-05
Authors: D K White; C Tudor-Locke; Y Zhang; J Niu; D T Felson; K D Gross; M C Nevitt; C E Lewis; J Torner; T Neogi Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2015-08-28 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Christine A Pellegrini; Sara M Powell; Nicholas Mook; Katherine DeVivo; Linda Ehrlich-Jones Journal: Curr Rheumatol Rep Date: 2018-10-06 Impact factor: 4.592
Authors: Jasmijn F M Holla; Diana C Sanchez-Ramirez; Marike van der Leeden; Johannes C F Ket; Leo D Roorda; Willem F Lems; Martijn P M Steultjens; Joost Dekker Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2014-05-20
Authors: Louise M Thoma; Dorothy Dunlop; Jing Song; Jungwha Lee; Catrine Tudor-Locke; Elroy J Aguiar; Hiral Master; Meredith B Christiansen; Daniel K White Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Daniel K White; Catrine Tudor-Locke; Yuqing Zhang; Roger Fielding; Michael LaValley; David T Felson; K Douglas Gross; Michael C Nevitt; Cora E Lewis; James Torner; Tuhina Neogi Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Britt Elin Øiestad; Emily Quinn; Daniel White; Frank Roemer; Ali Guermazi; Michael Nevitt; Neil A Segal; Cora E Lewis; David T Felson Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2015-06-15 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Daniel K White; Catrine Tudor-Locke; David T Felson; K Doug Gross; Jingbo Niu; Michael Nevitt; Cora E Lewis; James Torner; Tuhina Neogi Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2012-12-07 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Grace H Lo; Timothy E McAlindon; Gillian A Hawker; Jeffrey B Driban; Lori Lyn Price; Jing Song; Charles B Eaton; Marc C Hochberg; Rebecca D Jackson; C Kent Kwoh; Michael C Nevitt; Dorothy D Dunlop Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 10.995