Literature DB >> 23124644

Anatomic MR imaging and functional diffusion tensor imaging of peripheral nerve tumors and tumorlike conditions.

A Chhabra1, R S Thakkar, G Andreisek, M Chalian, A J Belzberg, J Blakeley, A Hoke, G K Thawait, J Eng, J A Carrino.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: A number of benign and malignant peripheral nerve tumor and tumorlike conditions produce similar imaging features on conventional anatomic MR imaging. Functional MR imaging using DTI can increment the diagnostic performance in differentiation of these lesions. Our aim was to evaluate the role of 3T anatomic MR imaging and DTI in the characterization of peripheral nerve tumor and tumorlike conditions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients (13 men, 16 women; mean age, 41±18 years; range, 11-83 years) with a nerve tumor or tumorlike condition (25 benign, 5 malignant) underwent 3T MR imaging by using anatomic (n=29), functional diffusion, DWI (n=21), and DTI (n=24) techniques. Images were evaluated for image quality (3-point scale), ADC of the lesion, tractography, and fractional anisotropy of nerves with interobserver reliability in ADC and FA measurements.
RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in age (benign, 40±18 versus malignant, 45±19 years) and sex (benign, male/female=12:12 versus malignant, male/female=3:2) (P>.05). All anatomic (29/29, 100%) MR imaging studies received "good" quality; 20/21 (95%) DWI and 21/24 (79%) DTI studies received "good" quality. ADC of benign lesions (1.848±0.40×10(-3) mm2/s) differed from that of malignant lesions (0.900±0.25×10(-3) mm2/s, P<.001) with excellent interobserver reliability (ICC=0.988 [95% CI, 0.976-0.994]). There were no FA or ADC differences between men and women (P>.05). FA of involved nerves was lower than that in contralateral healthy nerves (P<.001) with excellent interobserver reliability (ICC=0.970 [95% CI, 0.946-0.991]). ADC on DTI and DWI was not statistically different (P>.05), with excellent intermethod reliability (ICC=0.943 [95% CI, 0.836-0.980]). Tractography differences were observed in benign and malignant lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: 3T MR imaging and DTI are valuable methods for anatomic and functional evaluation of peripheral nerve lesions with excellent interobserver reliability. While tractography and low FA provide insight into neural integrity, low diffusivity values indicate malignancy in neural masses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23124644      PMCID: PMC4629840          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  30 in total

Review 1.  Fiber tracking: principles and strategies - a technical review.

Authors:  Susumu Mori; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 2.  MR neurography and muscle MR imaging for image diagnosis of disorders affecting the peripheral nerves and musculature.

Authors:  Aaron G Filler; Kenneth R Maravilla; Jay S Tsuruda
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 3.  High-resolution MR neurography of diffuse peripheral nerve lesions.

Authors:  S K Thawait; V Chaudhry; G K Thawait; K C Wang; A Belzberg; J A Carrino; A Chhabra
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  False-negative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography of a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor arising from a plexiform neurofibroma in the setting of neurofibromatosis type 1.

Authors:  Kameron R Shahid; Kimberly K Amrami; Robert J Esther; Val J Lowe; Robert J Spinner
Journal:  J Surg Orthop Adv       Date:  2011

Review 5.  High resolution imaging of tunnels by magnetic resonance neurography.

Authors:  Ty K Subhawong; Kenneth C Wang; Shrey K Thawait; Eric H Williams; Shahreyar Shar Hashemi; Antonio J Machado; John A Carrino; Avneesh Chhabra
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-04-10       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  3T MR tomography of the brachial plexus: structural and microstructural evaluation.

Authors:  Ammar Mallouhi; Wolfgang Marik; Daniela Prayer; Franz Kainberger; Gerd Bodner; Gregor Kasprian
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnostic evaluation of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors.

Authors:  A Chhabra; T Soldatos; D J Durand; J A Carrino; E F McCarthy; A J Belzberg
Journal:  Indian J Cancer       Date:  2011 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.224

8.  Diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation of quantitative MR parameters with Gleason score and tumor angiogenesis.

Authors:  Aytekin Oto; Cheng Yang; Arda Kayhan; Maria Tretiakova; Tatjana Antic; Christine Schmid-Tannwald; Scott Eggener; Gregory S Karczmar; Walter M Stadler
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 9.  3 Tesla MR neurography--technique, interpretation, and pitfalls.

Authors:  Avneesh Chhabra; Pearlene P Lee; Cary Bizzell; Theodoros Soldatos
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Gastric schwannomas show an obviously increased fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in positron emission tomography: report of two cases.

Authors:  Tetsuro Ohno; Kyoichi Ogata; Norimichi Kogure; Hiroyuki Ando; Ryuusuke Aihara; Erito Mochiki; Hiroaki Zai; Akihiko Sano; Toshihide Kato; Shinji Sakurai; Tetsunari Oyama; Takayuki Asao; Hiroyuki Kuwano
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.549

View more
  41 in total

1.  Diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging as adjuncts to conventional MRI for the diagnosis and management of peripheral nerve sheath tumors: current perspectives and future directions.

Authors:  Alexander T Mazal; Oganes Ashikyan; Jonathan Cheng; Lu Q Le; Avneesh Chhabra
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Granular cell tumor of the ulnar nerve: MR neurography characterization.

Authors:  Vibhor Wadhwa; Safia N Salaria; Avneesh Chhabra
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2014-06-30

Review 3.  An update in musculoskeletal tumors: from quantitative imaging to radiomics.

Authors:  Vito Chianca; Domenico Albano; Carmelo Messina; Gabriele Vincenzo; Stefania Rizzo; Filippo Del Grande; Luca Maria Sconfienza
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance neurography: current perspectives and literature review.

Authors:  Avneesh Chhabra; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Gustav Andreisek
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  [Imaging of the lumbosacral plexus : Diagnostics and treatment planning with high-resolution procedures].

Authors:  S Jengojan; C Schellen; G Bodner; G Kasprian
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Small-world indices via network efficiency for brain networks from diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Lan Lin; Zhenrong Fu; Cong Jin; Miao Tian; Shuicai Wu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  [Tumors of peripheral nerves].

Authors:  Michael Ho; Amelie M Lutz
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 8.  Large Cervical Vagus Nerve Tumor in a Patient with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Treated with Gross Total Resection: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  David P Bray; Andrew K Chan; Cynthia T Chin; Line Jacques
Journal:  J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj       Date:  2016-11-16

Review 9.  Noninvasive imaging of peripheral nerves.

Authors:  Gautam Rangavajla; Nassir Mokarram; Nazanin Masoodzadehgan; S Balakrishna Pai; Ravi V Bellamkonda
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.481

10.  Epithelioid sarcoma presenting as radial mononeuropathy: anatomical, magnetic resonance neurography and diffusion tensor imaging appearances.

Authors:  Vibhor Wadhwa; Safia N Salaria; Rashmi S Thakkar; Avneesh Chhabra
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.