Literature DB >> 23123505

Differences in tibia morphology between the sound and affected sides in ankle-foot orthosis-using survivors of stroke.

Kyle A Sherk1, Vanessa D Sherk, Mark A Anderson, Debra A Bemben, Michael G Bemben.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in tibia and proximal femur morphology between the affected and sound limbs in ankle-foot orthosis (AFO)-using survivors of stroke.
DESIGN: Observational study.
SETTING: A university bone density laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Ambulatory, AFO-using survivors of stroke (N=9; age range, 55-74y; poststroke duration, 13.5±4.4y; AFO use, 6.5±1.4y).
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total body and hip areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) were assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. The 4%, 38%, and 66% sites of both tibias were measured with peripheral quantitative computed tomography for total, cortical, and trabecular volumetric BMD (vBMD) and BMC. Bone geometry, bone strength index (BSI), strength strain index (SSI), and minimum and maximum rotated moments of inertia (Imin, Imax) were determined.
RESULTS: Total hip and trochanter BMC and aBMD were 7% to 19% greater on the sound side (P<.05). Total BMC and vBMD were 2% to 21% greater (P<.05) on the sound limb, depending on site. Trabecular BMC and vBMD and BSI values were 19%, 21%, and 31% higher (P<.05) on the sound limb at the 4% site. Cortical BMC and vBMD (P<.05), and cortical thickness (P<.01) were greater on the sound side at the 38% and 66% sites. Cortical area and bone strength (SSI, Imin) were greater (P<.05) at the 66% site. Endosteal circumferences were greater on the affected side (P<.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Interlimb differences in bone characteristics after a stroke persist despite returning to ambulatory status with AFO use.
Copyright © 2013 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23123505      PMCID: PMC4119800          DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  20 in total

1.  Effect of nursing care on self-care efficiency of patients with hemiparesis.

Authors:  Kazimiera Adamczyk; Regina Lorencowicz; Anna Zajko; Elzbieta Rejszel
Journal:  Ann Univ Mariae Curie Sklodowska Med       Date:  2002

Review 2.  Bone quality: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Side-to-side differences in bone strength in master jumpers and sprinters.

Authors:  A Ireland; M Korhonen; A Heinonen; H Suominen; C Baur; S Stevens; H Degens; J Rittweger
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.041

4.  Contralateral comparison of bone geometry, BMD and muscle function in the lower leg and forearm after stroke.

Authors:  R Talla; M Galea; N Lythgo; T Angeli; P Eser
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.041

5.  The effect of hemiplegia on bone mass and soft tissue body composition.

Authors:  E Iversen; C Hassager; C Christiansen
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.209

6.  Structural analysis of the human tibia in men with spinal cord injury by tomographic (pQCT) serial scans.

Authors:  Jörn Rittweger; Vicky L Goosey-Tolfrey; Gustavo Cointry; José Luis Ferretti
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Ambulatory level and asymmetrical weight bearing after stroke affects bone loss in the upper and lower part of the femoral neck differently: bone adaptation after decreased mechanical loading.

Authors:  L Jørgensen; N J Crabtree; J Reeve; B K Jacobsen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Changes in bone mineral content and density after stroke.

Authors:  R C Hamdy; G Krishnaswamy; V Cancellaro; K Whalen; L Harvill
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.159

9.  Long-term effects of strokes on bone mass.

Authors:  R C Hamdy; S W Moore; V A Cancellaro; L M Harvill
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.159

10.  An assessment of osteoporosis in stroke patients on rehabilitation admission.

Authors:  Yuriko Watanabe
Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.479

View more
  2 in total

1.  The impact of stroke on bone properties and muscle-bone relationship: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  F Z Yang; D A M Jehu; H Ouyang; F M H Lam; M Y C Pang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Gait speed and spasticity are independently associated with estimated failure load in the distal tibia after stroke: an HR-pQCT study.

Authors:  Tiev Miller; Ling Qin; Vivian W Y Hung; Michael T C Ying; Charlotte S L Tsang; Huixi Ouyang; Raymond C K Chung; Marco Y C Pang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 4.507

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.