BACKGROUND: Dementia caregiving is strongly linked to depression, anxiety, and burden in caregivers. Little is known about whether the same holds for people supporting an older person with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We aim to systematically review the current evidence for negative caregiver outcomes in MCI using Pearlin and colleagues' stress process model as a theoretical framework. METHODS: Widely used scientific literature databases were searched using MCI- and caregiver-related terms with "AND" relations. Results were limited to quantitative English language articles published in peer-reviewed journals between 1980 and November 2010. RESULTS: Of the 266 identified articles, six reported relevant depression data on 988 MCI caregivers (73% spouses). The pooled Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D) mean score was 12.95 (standard deviation = 6.16). The pooled depression prevalence (i.e., CES-D score ≥ 16 or equivalent) was 23%. Two studies compared depression in MCI and dementia caregivers, indicating higher levels in dementia caregivers. Other outcomes, such as burden, stress, or anxiety, were only investigated by individual studies precluding pooling of data. Similarly, pooling of the data on the predictors of caregiver outcomes was impossible because of data heterogeneity. However, descriptive analysis of predictors revealed that Pearlin and colleagues' caregiver stress process model at least partially applies to the MCI context. CONCLUSIONS: The studies reviewed were all cross sectional in design, involving clinical samples, thus limiting generalizability. Depression and psychological comorbidity, although not as pronounced as in dementia caregivers, are common complications in MCI caregivers. The long-term course of outcomes in MCI caregivers requires further investigation.
BACKGROUND:Dementia caregiving is strongly linked to depression, anxiety, and burden in caregivers. Little is known about whether the same holds for people supporting an older person with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We aim to systematically review the current evidence for negative caregiver outcomes in MCI using Pearlin and colleagues' stress process model as a theoretical framework. METHODS: Widely used scientific literature databases were searched using MCI- and caregiver-related terms with "AND" relations. Results were limited to quantitative English language articles published in peer-reviewed journals between 1980 and November 2010. RESULTS: Of the 266 identified articles, six reported relevant depression data on 988 MCI caregivers (73% spouses). The pooled Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D) mean score was 12.95 (standard deviation = 6.16). The pooled depression prevalence (i.e., CES-D score ≥ 16 or equivalent) was 23%. Two studies compared depression in MCI and dementia caregivers, indicating higher levels in dementia caregivers. Other outcomes, such as burden, stress, or anxiety, were only investigated by individual studies precluding pooling of data. Similarly, pooling of the data on the predictors of caregiver outcomes was impossible because of data heterogeneity. However, descriptive analysis of predictors revealed that Pearlin and colleagues' caregiver stress process model at least partially applies to the MCI context. CONCLUSIONS: The studies reviewed were all cross sectional in design, involving clinical samples, thus limiting generalizability. Depression and psychological comorbidity, although not as pronounced as in dementia caregivers, are common complications in MCI caregivers. The long-term course of outcomes in MCI caregivers requires further investigation.
Authors: Noelle E Carlozzi; Carey W Sherman; Kaley Angers; Mitchell P Belanger; Amy M Austin; Kelly A Ryan Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 3.658
Authors: Rebecca Gathercole; Rosie Bradley; Emma Harper; Lucy Davies; Lynn Pank; Natalie Lam; Anna Davies; Emma Talbot; Emma Hooper; Rachel Winson; Bethany Scutt; Victoria Ordonez Montano; Samantha Nunn; Grace Lavelle; Matthew Lariviere; Shashivadan Hirani; Stefano Brini; Andrew Bateman; Peter Bentham; Alistair Burns; Barbara Dunk; Kirsty Forsyth; Chris Fox; Catherine Henderson; Martin Knapp; Iracema Leroi; Stanton Newman; John O'Brien; Fiona Poland; John Woolham; Richard Gray; Robert Howard Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2021-03 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Janis E Campbell; Keith Kleszynski; Amanda E Janitz; Amber S Anderson; Claire Dowers-Nichols; Andrew N Dentino; Laurence Z Rubenstein; Thomas A Teasdale Journal: J Okla State Med Assoc Date: 2018-11
Authors: Yvonne Yueh-Feng Lu; Jennifer Ellis; Ziyi Yang; Michael T Weaver; Tamilyn Bakas; Mary Guerriero Austrom; Joan E Haase Journal: J Nurs Scholarsh Date: 2016-04-27 Impact factor: 3.176