Literature DB >> 23123080

[Women with previous caesarean or other uterine scar: epidemiological features].

C Deneux-Tharaux1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of uterine scar and the risk of associated obstetrical complications and current modes of delivery in women with a previous cesarean.
METHOD: Consultation of the Medline database, and of the National Perinatal Surveys data.
RESULTS: Previous cesarean is the main cause of uterine scar. In France, the cesarean rate increased from 15.5% in 1995 to 20.8% in 2010; as a consequence, the prevalence of previous cesarean also increased from 8 to 11% of parturients and from 14 to 19% of multiparas, between 1995 and 2010. Previous cesarean is, in developed countries, the main risk factor for uterine rupture, whose global incidence is estimated between 0.1 and 0.5% in parturients with previous cesarean. Women with previous cesarean also are at higher risk for abnormal placenta insertion, the strength of the association increasing with the number of previous cesareans: twice higher risk of placenta praevia and greater maternal morbidity associated with placenta praevia; major risk factor for placenta accreta in particular in women combining previous cesarean and placenta praevia. Modes of delivery in women with previous cesarean vary widely between countries. According to the 2010 National Perinatal Survey, in France, 51% have a cesarean before labor; among those with a trial of labor, 75% deliver vaginally; in total, 36.5% have a vaginal delivery.
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of uterine scar is increasing, following the rise in cesarean rate. This condition is a risk factor for obstetrical complications in subsequent pregnancies. Women with multiple previous cesareans are particularly at risk.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23123080     DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.09.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)        ISSN: 0150-9918


  5 in total

Review 1.  Comparison between modified Misgav-Ladach and Pfannenstiel-Kerr techniques for Cesarean section: review of literature.

Authors:  Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Ilaria Marilli; Pietro Cignini; Francesco Padula; Laura D'Emidio; Lucia Mangiafico; Agnese Maria Chiara Rapisarda; Ferdinando Antonio Gulino; Stefano Cianci; Antonio Biondi; Claudio Giorlandino
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun

2.  [Risk factors for maternal and perinatal mortality among women undergoing cesarean section in Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of Congo II].

Authors:  Xavier Kinenkinda; Olivier Mukuku; Faustin Chenge; Prosper Kakudji; Peter Banzulu; Jean-Baptiste Kakoma; Justin Kizonde
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2017-04-17

3.  [Pregnancy and delivery in patients with a personal history of cesarean section in Dakar: epidemiological, clinical, therapeutic and prognostic aspects].

Authors:  Cyr Espérance Koulimaya-Gombet; Abdoul Aziz Diouf; Moussa Diallo; Anna Dia; Codou Sène; Jean Charles Moreau; Alassane Diouf
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2017-06-22

4.  Teaching and performing audits on caesarean delivery reduce the caesarean delivery rate.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Lesieur; Julie Blanc; Anderson Loundou; Arnaud Claquin; Michele Marcot; Helene Heckenroth; Florence Bretelle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Pregnancy vulnerability in urban areas: a pragmatic approach combining behavioral, medico-obstetrical, socio-economic and environmental factors.

Authors:  Alice Brembilla; Nadine Bernard; Sophie Pujol; Anne-Laure Parmentier; Astrid Eckman; Anne-Sophie Mariet; Hélène Houot; Quentin Tenailleau; Gérard Thiriez; Didier Riethmuller; Marie Barba-Vasseur; Frédéric Mauny
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.