Literature DB >> 23123071

Pallidal deep brain stimulation in patients with primary generalised or segmental dystonia: 5-year follow-up of a randomised trial.

Jens Volkmann1, Alexander Wolters, Andreas Kupsch, Jörg Müller, Andrea A Kühn, Gerd-Helge Schneider, Werner Poewe, Sascha Hering, Wilhelm Eisner, Jan-Uwe Müller, Günther Deuschl, Marcus O Pinsker, Inger-Marie Skogseid, Geir Ketil Roeste, Martin Krause, Volker Tronnier, Alfons Schnitzler, Jürgen Voges, Guido Nikkhah, Jan Vesper, Joseph Classen, Markus Naumann, Reiner Benecke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Severe forms of primary dystonia are difficult to manage medically. We assessed the safety and efficacy of pallidal neurostimulation in patients with primary generalised or segmental dystonia prospectively followed up for 5 years in a controlled multicentre trial.
METHODS: In the parent trial, 40 patients were randomly assigned to either sham neurostimulation or neurostimulation of the internal globus pallidus for a period of 3 months and thereafter all patients completed 6 months of active neurostimulation. 38 patients agreed to be followed up annually after the activation of neurostimulation, including assessments of dystonia severity, pain, disability, and quality of life. The primary endpoint of the 5-year follow-up study extension was the change in dystonia severity at 3 years and 5 years as assessed by open-label ratings of the Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating scale (BFMDRS) motor score compared with the preoperative baseline and the 6-month visit. The primary endpoint was analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. The original trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00142259).
FINDINGS: An intention-to-treat analysis including all patients from the parent trial showed significant improvements in dystonia severity at 3 years and 5 years compared with baseline, which corresponded to -20·8 points (SD 17·1; -47·9%; n=40) at 6 months; -26·5 points (19·7; -61·1%; n=31) at 3 years; and -25·1 points (21·3; -57·8%; n=32). The improvement from 6 months to 3 years (-5·7 points [SD 8·4]; -34%) was significant and sustained at the 5-year follow-up (-4·3 [10·4]). 49 new adverse events occurred between 6 months and 5 years. Dysarthria and transient worsening of dystonia were the most common non-serious adverse events. 21 adverse events were rated serious and were almost exclusively device related. One patient attempted suicide shortly after the 6-month visit during a depressive episode. All serious adverse events resolved without permanent sequelae.
INTERPRETATION: 3 years and 5 years after surgery, pallidal neurostimulation continues to be an effective and relatively safe treatment option for patients with severe idiopathic dystonia. This long-term observation provides further evidence in favour of pallidal neurostimulation as a first-line treatment for patients with medically intractable, segmental, or generalised dystonia. FUNDING: Medtronic.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23123071     DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70257-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Neurol        ISSN: 1474-4422            Impact factor:   44.182


  81 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of dystonia.

Authors:  Mary Ann Thenganatt; Joseph Jankovic
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 2.  Designing clinical trials for dystonia.

Authors:  Wendy R Galpern; Christopher S Coffey; Alberto Albanese; Ken Cheung; Cynthia L Comella; Dixie J Ecklund; Stanley Fahn; Joseph Jankovic; Karl Kieburtz; Anthony E Lang; Michael P McDermott; Jeremy M Shefner; Jan K Teller; John L P Thompson; Sharon D Yeatts; H A Jinnah
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 7.620

3.  Long-term neuropsychiatric outcomes after pallidal stimulation in primary and secondary dystonia.

Authors:  Sara Meoni; Mateusz Zurowski; Andres M Lozano; Mojgan Hodaie; Yu-Yan Poon; Melanie Fallis; Valerie Voon; Elena Moro
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 4.  [Deep brain stimulation for hyperkinetic movement disorders].

Authors:  M M Reich; J Volkmann
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.214

5.  Alleviation of myoclonus after bilateral pallidal deep brain stimulation for Lance-Adams syndrome.

Authors:  Takashi Asahi; Daina Kashiwazaki; Nobuhiro Dougu; Genko Oyama; Shutaro Takashima; Kortaro Tanaka; Satoshi Kuroda
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 6.  Diagnosis and treatment of dystonia.

Authors:  H A Jinnah; Stewart A Factor
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 7.  [Long-term effects of deep brain stimulation for movement disorders: a literature-based analysis].

Authors:  O Eberhardt; T Reithmeier; H Topka
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.214

8.  Failure of Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation in a Case of Rapid-Onset Dystonia Parkinsonism (DYT12).

Authors:  Christof Brücke; Andreas Horn; Peter Huppke; Andreas Kupsch; Gerd-Helge Schneider; Andrea A Kühn
Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract       Date:  2014-12-30

Review 9.  Toward Electrophysiology-Based Intelligent Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation for Movement Disorders.

Authors:  Andrea A Kühn; R Mark Richardson; Wolf-Julian Neumann; Robert S Turner; Benjamin Blankertz; Tom Mitchell
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 10.  Defining research priorities in dystonia.

Authors:  Codrin Lungu; Laurie Ozelius; David Standaert; Mark Hallett; Beth-Anne Sieber; Christine Swanson-Fisher; Brian D Berman; Nicole Calakos; Jennifer C Moore; Joel S Perlmutter; Sarah E Pirio Richardson; Rachel Saunders-Pullman; Laura Scheinfeldt; Nutan Sharma; Roy Sillitoe; Kristina Simonyan; Philip A Starr; Anna Taylor; Jerrold Vitek
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 9.910

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.