Literature DB >> 23122834

Off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy preserves renal function: a multi-institutional propensity score analysis.

Bartosz F Kaczmarek1, Youssef S Tanagho, Shahab P Hillyer, Jeffrey K Mullins, Mireya Diaz, Quoc-Dien Trinh, Sam B Bhayani, Mohamad E Allaf, Michael D Stifelman, Jihad H Kaouk, Craig G Rogers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ongoing efforts are focused on minimizing or eliminating renal ischemia during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN). Although various techniques allowing the elimination of renal hilar clamping have been described, large multi-institutional studies assessing perioperative and functional outcomes of this approach are lacking.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate perioperative and functional outcomes of RPN without hilar clamping and to assess comparative effectiveness relative to clamped RPN. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A multi-institutional data analysis of prospectively collected records of 886 RPNs performed by high-volume surgeons across five academic institutions between 2007 and 2011 was carried out. A total of 66 patients who underwent RPN without hilar clamping were identified. After the exclusion of 17 patients, perioperative results of 49 patients were compared against propensity score matched clamped controls. INTERVENTION: RPN without hilar clamping. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics and propensity score matching. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Patients undergoing off-clamp RPN had a mean tumor size of 2.5 cm (standard deviation [SD]: ± 2.1) and a mean RENAL nephrometry score of 5.3 (SD: ± 1.5). The mean preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 81 (SD: ± 29). The mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 210 ml (SD: ± 212), and the mean operative time was 155 min (SD: ± 46). No Clavien 3-5 complications were recorded. The mean postoperative change in eGFR was 3% at first follow-up (1-3 mo), and no patient required postoperative dialysis. The positive surgical margin rate was 3% (n=2), with no disease recurrence reported at a mean follow-up of 21 mo. In propensity score matched analyses, the off-clamp RPN patients had a significantly shorter mean operative time (156 min compared with 185 min, p<0.001), a higher EBL (228 ml compared with 157 ml, p=0.009), and a smaller decrease in eGFR (2% compared with -6%, p=0.008). The retrospective analysis was the main limitation of this study.
CONCLUSIONS: With appropriately selected patients and adequate surgeon experience, off-clamp RPN is safe and feasible. Off-clamp RPN was associated with higher EBL, shorter operative times, and smaller decrease in renal function.
Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nephron-sparing surgery; No clamp; Off-clamp; Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy; Robotic partial nephrectomy; Warm ischemia time; Zero ischemia

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23122834     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  26 in total

1.  Robotic partial nephrectomy and early unclamping: an evolving paradigm.

Authors:  S S Goonewardene; M Brown; B Challacombe
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-12-24

Review 2.  What is next in robotic urology?

Authors:  Xavier Cathelineau; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Arjun Sivaraman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Laparascopic nephrectomy: different techniques and approaches.

Authors:  Tania González León
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Zero ischaemia partial nephrectomy: a call for standardized nomenclature and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Ahmad Alenezi; Giacomo Novara; Alexander Mottrie; Salah Al-Buheissi; Omer Karim
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Impact of robotic partial nephrectomy with and without ischemia on renal functions: experience in 34 cases.

Authors:  Kemal Ener; Abdullah Erdem Canda; Serkan Altınova; Ali Fuat Atmaca; Erdal Alkan; Erem Asil; Muhammet Fuat Özcan; Ziya Akbulut; Mevlana Derya Balbay
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-12

6.  Off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy does not benefit short-term renal function: a matched cohort analysis.

Authors:  Barrett G Anderson; Aaron M Potretzke; Kefu Du; Joel Vetter; R Sherburne Figenshau
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-08-31

Review 7.  Frontiers in robot-assisted retroperitoneal oncological surgery.

Authors:  Wesley W Ludwig; Michael A Gorin; Phillip M Pierorazio; Mohamad E Allaf
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  The zero ischemia index (ZII): a novel criterion for predicting complexity and outcomes of off-clamp partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Yaohui Li; Lin Zhou; Tingchang Bian; Zhuoyi Xiang; Yeqing Xu; Yanjun Zhu; Xiaoyi Hu; Shuai Jiang; Jianming Guo; Hang Wang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  A Literature Review of Renal Surgical Anatomy and Surgical Strategies for Partial Nephrectomy.

Authors:  Tobias Klatte; Vincenzo Ficarra; Christian Gratzke; Jihad Kaouk; Alexander Kutikov; Veronica Macchi; Alexandre Mottrie; Francesco Porpiglia; James Porter; Craig G Rogers; Paul Russo; R Houston Thompson; Robert G Uzzo; Christopher G Wood; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Robotic partial nephrectomy performed with Airseal versus a standard CO2 pressure pneumoperitoneum insufflator: a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Filippo Annino; Luca Topazio; Domenico Autieri; Tiziano Verdacchi; Michele De Angelis; Anastasios D Asimakopoulos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.