Literature DB >> 27909621

Impact of robotic partial nephrectomy with and without ischemia on renal functions: experience in 34 cases.

Kemal Ener1, Abdullah Erdem Canda2, Serkan Altınova1, Ali Fuat Atmaca2, Erdal Alkan3, Erem Asil1, Muhammet Fuat Özcan1, Ziya Akbulut2, Mevlana Derya Balbay3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this study we aimed to compare renal functions in patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) with on-clamp and zero- ischemia techniques.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2009 and 2015, 12 off-clamp and 22 on-clamp RPN procedures were performed on a total of 34 patients in two centers. The main outcome parameters examined were serum creatinine, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) during preoperative, immediate postoperative periods, and at postoperative 3rd months.
RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between on-clamp and zero- ischemia groups regarding age, ASA score, BMI, PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores, operation time and tumor size (p>0.05). Significant differences were found in the duration of hospital stay (3.8±0.9 days vs. 3.0±0.9 days) and amount of blood loss (85.9±49.6 mL vs. 183.3±176.2 mL) between the on-clamp and zero-ischemia groups (p<0.05). Statistically significant differences were found between preoperative and immediate post-operative periods, in terms of eGFR and serum creatinine levels in both groups. Moreover, statistically significant differences were found between preoperative and postoperative 3rd month periods, in the on-clamp group in terms of eGFR and serum creatinine levels. In the zero-ischemia group, the decrease in eGFR and serum creatinine levels at postoperative 3rd month relative to the preoperative period was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: Off-clamp RPN technique is superior, in short-term outcomes involving renal functions, compared to on clamp approach. However, long- term data regarding the renal functions should be evaluated to arrive at a definitive decision.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Partial nephrectomy; kidney function; renal cell carcinoma; robotic surgery

Year:  2016        PMID: 27909621      PMCID: PMC5125742          DOI: 10.5152/tud.2016.67790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Urol        ISSN: 2149-3235


  26 in total

1.  Robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: utilization rates and perioperative outcomes.

Authors:  Jesse D Sammon; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Maxine Sun; Praful Ravi; Khurshid R Ghani; Wooju Jeong; Marco Bianchi; Jens Hansen; Paul Perrotte; James O Peabody; Craig G Rogers; Shahrokh F Shariat; Mani Menon; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

2.  Effect of parenchymal volume preservation on kidney function after partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Matthew N Simmons; Amr F Fergany; Steven C Campbell
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Robotic partial nephrectomy without renal ischemia.

Authors:  Ryan Novak; Daniel Mulligan; Ronney Abaza
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group.

Authors:  A S Levey; J P Bosch; J B Lewis; T Greene; N Rogers; D Roth
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system.

Authors:  Matthew T Gettman; Michael L Blute; George K Chow; Richard Neururer; Georg Bartsch; Reinhard Peschel
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: step-by-step contemporary technique and surgical outcomes at a single high-volume institution.

Authors:  Jihad H Kaouk; Ali Khalifeh; Shahab Hillyer; Georges-Pascal Haber; Robert J Stein; Riccardo Autorino
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  S A Fuhrman; L C Lasky; C Limas
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.394

8.  Robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy: a four-arm approach.

Authors:  Joseph Feliciano; Michael Stifelman
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Importance and limits of ischemia in renal partial surgery: experimental and clinical research.

Authors:  Fernando P Secin
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2008

10.  A comparison of surgical and functional outcomes of robot-assisted versus pure laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Jae Duck Choi; Jong Wook Park; Hye Won Lee; Dong-Gi Lee; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Soo Jeon; Hyun Moo Lee; Han Yong Choi; Seong Il Seo
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  3 in total

1.  Off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy does not benefit short-term renal function: a matched cohort analysis.

Authors:  Barrett G Anderson; Aaron M Potretzke; Kefu Du; Joel Vetter; R Sherburne Figenshau
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-08-31

2.  Off-clamp partial nephrectomy has a positive impact on short- and long-term renal function: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wen Deng; Xiaoqiang Liu; Jieping Hu; Luyao Chen; Bin Fu
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 2.388

3.  Comparison of Perioperative, Renal Functional, and Oncological Outcomes Between Off-Clamp and On-Clamp Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Tumors: An Updated Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Yin Huang; Dehong Cao; Zeyu Chen; Bo Chen; Jin Li; Jianbing Guo; Qiang Dong; Qiang Wei; Liangren Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 6.244

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.