Literature DB >> 24670018

The role of 3-D endorectal ultrasound in rectal cancer: our experience.

Nikola Y Kolev1, Anton Y Tonev, Valentin L Ignatov, Aleksander K Zlatarov, Vasil M Bojkov, Tanya D Kirilova, Elitsa Encheva, Krasimir Ivanov.   

Abstract

In the last 20 years, endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) has been one of the main diagnostic methods for locoregional staging of rectal cancer. ERUS is accurate modality for evaluating local invasion of rectal carcinoma into the rectal wall layers (T category). Adding the three-dimensional modality (3-D) increases the capabilities of this diagnostic tool in rectal cancer patients. We review the literature and report our experience in preoperative 3-D ERUS in rectal cancer staging. In the group of 71 patients, the staging of preoperative 3-D endorectal ultrasonography was compared with the postoperative morphologic examination. Three-dimensional ERUS preoperative staging was confirmed with morphologic evaluation in 66 out of 71 cases (92.9%). The detection sensitivities of rectal cancer with 3-D ERUS were as follows: T1, 92.8%; T2, 93.1%; T3, 91.6%; and T4, 100.0%; with specificity values of T1, 98.2%; T2, 95.4%; T3, 97.8%; and T4, 98.5%. Three-dimensional ERUS correctly categorized patients with T1, 97.1%; T2, 94.3%; T3, 95.7%; and T4, 98.5%. The percentage of total overstaged cases was 2.75% and that of understaged cases was 6.87%. The metastatic status of the lymph nodes was determined with a sensitivity of 79.1% (19 of 24), specificity of 91.4% (43 of 47), and diagnostic accuracy of 87.3% (62 of 71). In our experience, 3-D ERUS has the potential to become the diagnostic modality of choice for the preoperative staging of rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24670018      PMCID: PMC3968834          DOI: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-13-00227.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Surg        ISSN: 0020-8868


  25 in total

1.  The role of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in the postoperative follow-up of patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  M Hünerbein; S Totkas; K T Moesta; C Ulmer; T Handke; P M Schlag
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging--a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shandra Bipat; Afina S Glas; Frederik J M Slors; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Comparative study of three-dimensional and conventional endorectal ultrasonography used in rectal cancer staging.

Authors:  J C Kim; Y K Cho; S Y Kim; S K Park; M G Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography in preoperative staging of rectal tumors.

Authors:  Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Johan Pollack; Suk-Hwan Lee; Enrique Hernandez de Anda; Anders Mellgren; W Douglas Wong; Charles O Finne; David A Rothenberger; Robert D Madoff
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Prospective comparison of endorectal ultrasound, three-dimensional endorectal ultrasound, and endorectal MRI in the preoperative evaluation of rectal tumors. Preliminary results.

Authors:  M Hünerbein; W Pegios; B Rau; T J Vogl; R Felix; P M Schlag
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Routine use of transrectal ultrasound in rectal carcinoma: results of a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  F Marusch; A Koch; U Schmidt; R Zippel; R Kuhn; S Wolff; M Pross; A Wierth; I Gastinger; H Lippert
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  [Preoperative diagnostic procedures in locally advanced rectal carcinoma (> or =T3 or N+). What does endoluminal ultrasound achieve at staging and restaging (after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy) in contrast to computed tomography?].

Authors:  T Liersch; C Langer; C Jakob; D Müller; B M Ghadimi; A Siemer; P M Markus; L Füzesi; H Becker
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Rectal endosonography can distinguish benign rectal lesions from invasive early rectal cancers.

Authors:  M Starck; M Bohe; M Simanaitis; L Valentin
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Endorectal ultrasound detection of focal carcinoma within rectal adenomas.

Authors:  Stewart Worrell; Karen Horvath; Tonya Blakemore; David Flum
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Effectiveness of preoperative staging in rectal cancer: digital rectal examination, endoluminal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging?

Authors:  G Brown; S Davies; G T Williams; M W Bourne; R G Newcombe; A G Radcliffe; J Blethyn; N S Dallimore; B I Rees; C J Phillips; T S Maughan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-07-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Advances in endoscopic ultrasound imaging of colorectal diseases.

Authors:  Elena Tatiana Cârțână; Dan Ionuț Gheonea; Adrian Săftoiu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  State-of-the-art surgery for recurrent and locally advanced rectal cancers.

Authors:  Mufaddal Kazi; Vivek Sukumar; Ashwin Desouza; Avanish Saklani
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance imaging and endorectal ultrasound for diagnosis of rectal lesions.

Authors:  Franciszek Burdan; Iwona Sudol-Szopinska; Elzbieta Staroslawska; Malgorzata Kolodziejczak; Robert Klepacz; Agnieszka Mocarska; Marek Caban; Iwonna Zelazowska-Cieslinska; Justyna Szumilo
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.175

Review 4.  Endoscopic ultrasound in oncology: An update of clinical applications in the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Manuel Valero; Carlos Robles-Medranda
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-06-16

5.  Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and 3D endoanal ultrasound in detection, staging and assessment post treatment, in anal cancer.

Authors:  Alfonso Reginelli; Vincenza Granata; Roberta Fusco; Francesco Granata; Daniela Rega; Luca Roberto; Gianluca Pellino; Antonio Rotondo; Francesco Selvaggi; Francesco Izzo; Antonella Petrillo; Roberto Grassi
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-04

6.  Use of Ultrasonography in Clarifying the Etiology of Anal Pain.

Authors:  Ashraf Talaat Youssef
Journal:  J Med Ultrasound       Date:  2017-05-03

7.  The predictive value of tumor volume reduction ratio on three-dimensional endorectal ultrasound for tumor response to chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Limei Chen; Xiaoyin Liu; Wenjing Zhang; Si Qin; Yimin Wang; Jing Lin; Qiu Chen; Guangjian Liu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-06

Review 8.  Transrectal ultrasonography of anorectal diseases: advantages and disadvantages.

Authors:  Min Ju Kim
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2014-11-19

Review 9.  Radiological assessment of anal cancer: an overview and update.

Authors:  Vincenza Granata; Roberta Fusco; Alfonso Reginelli; Luca Roberto; Francesco Granata; Daniela Rega; Antonio Rotondo; Roberto Grassi; Francesco Izzo; Antonella Petrillo
Journal:  Infect Agent Cancer       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.965

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.