OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and evaluate our experience in DR screening in a study carried out between the Ophthalmology Department of the University General Hospital of Alicante and Department 19 Primary Care of Alicante by using a non-retinal mydriatic camera and telemedicine. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted on 2,435 diabetic patients from 1 February 2006 to 1 February 2009. Three 45° retinographies of both eyes of each patient were obtained and sent to the Department of Ophthalmology via the hospital intranet. These were then evaluated by 2 ophthalmologists, experts in the retina, with each issuing an individualized report for each patient. RESULTS: The prevalence of DR was 17.90%, with 80.73% of them having mild-moderate proliferative DR, 12.16% severe non-proliferative DR, 2.29% proliferative DR, and 4.82% with diabetic maculopathy associated with any level of retinopathy. The retinographies were considered low quality in 41 patients (1.69%). CONCLUSIONS: We highlight the benefits of the tele-ophthalmology in screening diabetic patients to enable early diagnosis and treatment, and improving the circuit of communication between primary and specialist care.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and evaluate our experience in DR screening in a study carried out between the Ophthalmology Department of the University General Hospital of Alicante and Department 19 Primary Care of Alicante by using a non-retinal mydriatic camera and telemedicine. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted on 2,435 diabeticpatients from 1 February 2006 to 1 February 2009. Three 45° retinographies of both eyes of each patient were obtained and sent to the Department of Ophthalmology via the hospital intranet. These were then evaluated by 2 ophthalmologists, experts in the retina, with each issuing an individualized report for each patient. RESULTS: The prevalence of DR was 17.90%, with 80.73% of them having mild-moderate proliferative DR, 12.16% severe non-proliferative DR, 2.29% proliferative DR, and 4.82% with diabetic maculopathy associated with any level of retinopathy. The retinographies were considered low quality in 41 patients (1.69%). CONCLUSIONS: We highlight the benefits of the tele-ophthalmology in screening diabeticpatients to enable early diagnosis and treatment, and improving the circuit of communication between primary and specialist care.
Authors: P Goyal; T R Padhi; T Das; L Pradhan; S Sutar; S Butola; U C Behera; L Jain; S Jalali Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2017-07-24 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: José María Castillo-Otí; Joaquín Cañal-Villanueva; María Teresa García-Unzueta; Ana Isabel Galván-Manso; María Rosa Callejas-Herrero; Pedro Muñoz-Cacho Journal: Aten Primaria Date: 2019-05-17 Impact factor: 1.137
Authors: Pedro Romero-Aroca; Maribel López-Galvez; Maria Asuncion Martinez-Brocca; Alicia Pareja-Ríos; Sara Artola; Josep Franch-Nadal; Joan Fernandez-Ballart; José Andonegui; Marc Baget-Bernaldiz Journal: Healthcare (Basel) Date: 2022-07-16