Literature DB >> 23121432

Failed awake craniotomy: a retrospective analysis in 424 patients undergoing craniotomy for brain tumor.

Erez Nossek1, Idit Matot, Tal Shahar, Ori Barzilai, Yoni Rapoport, Tal Gonen, Gal Sela, Akiva Korn, Daniel Hayat, Zvi Ram.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Awake craniotomy for removal of intraaxial tumors within or adjacent to eloquent brain regions is a well-established procedure. However, awake craniotomy failures have not been well characterized. In the present study, the authors aimed to analyze and assess the incidence and causes for failed awake craniotomy.
METHODS: The database of awake craniotomies performed at Tel Aviv Medical Center between 2003 and 2010 was reviewed. Awake craniotomy was considered a failure if conversion to general anesthesia was required, or if adequate mapping or monitoring could not have been achieved.
RESULTS: Of 488 patients undergoing awake craniotomy, 424 were identified as having complete medical, operative, and anesthesiology records. The awake craniotomies performed in 27 (6.4%) of these 424 patients were considered failures. The main causes of failure were lack of intraoperative communication with the patient (n = 18 [4.2%]) and/or intraoperative seizures (n = 9 [2.1%]). Preoperative mixed dysphasia (p < 0.001) and treatment with phenytoin (p = 0.0019) were related to failure due to lack of communication. History of seizures (p = 0.03) and treatment with multiple antiepileptic drugs (p = 0.0012) were found to be related to failure due to intraoperative seizures. Compared with the successful awake craniotomy group, a significantly lower rate of gross-total resection was achieved (83% vs 54%, p = 0.008), there was a higher incidence of short-term speech deterioration postoperatively (6.1% vs 23.5%, p = 0.0017) as well as at 3 months postoperatively (2.3% vs 15.4%, p = 0.0002), and the hospitalization period was longer (4.9 ± 6.2 days vs 8.0 ± 10.1 days, p < 0.001). Significantly more major complications occurred in the failure group (4 [14.8%] of 27) than in the successful group (16 [4%] of 397) (p = 0.037).
CONCLUSIONS: Failures of awake craniotomy were associated with a lower incidence of gross-total resection and increased postoperative morbidity. The majority of awake craniotomy failures were preventable by adequate patient selection and avoiding side effects of drugs administered during surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23121432     DOI: 10.3171/2012.10.JNS12511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  35 in total

1.  Risk factors for intraoperative stimulation-related seizures during awake surgery: an analysis of 109 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Giannantonio Spena; Elena Roca; Francesco Guerrini; Pier Paolo Panciani; Lorenzo Stanzani; Andrea Salmaggi; Sabino Luzzi; Marco Fontanella
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Clinical impact of intraoperative CCEP monitoring in evaluating the dorsal language white matter pathway.

Authors:  Yukihiro Yamao; Kengo Suzuki; Takeharu Kunieda; Riki Matsumoto; Yoshiki Arakawa; Takuro Nakae; Sei Nishida; Rika Inano; Sumiya Shibata; Akihiro Shimotake; Takayuki Kikuchi; Nobukatsu Sawamoto; Nobuhiro Mikuni; Akio Ikeda; Hidenao Fukuyama; Susumu Miyamoto
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Technical principles in glioma surgery and preoperative considerations.

Authors:  Daria Krivosheya; Sujit S Prabhu; Jeffrey S Weinberg; Raymond Sawaya
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Impact of connectivity between the pars triangularis and orbitalis on identifying the frontal language area in patients with dominant frontal gliomas.

Authors:  Taiichi Saito; Yoshihiro Muragaki; Manabu Tamura; Takashi Maruyama; Masayuki Nitta; Shunsuke Tsuzuki; Takakazu Kawamata
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Electrical Stimulation Mapping of the Brain: Basic Principles and Emerging Alternatives.

Authors:  Anthony L Ritaccio; Peter Brunner; Gerwin Schalk
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.177

Review 6.  [Anesthesiological management of awake craniotomy : Asleep-awake-asleep technique or without sedation].

Authors:  M Seemann; N Zech; B Graf; E Hansen
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Prophylactic antiepileptic treatment with levetiracetam for patients undergoing supratentorial brain tumor surgery: a two-center matched cohort study.

Authors:  Maria Kamenova; Maya Stein; Zvi Ram; Rachel Grossman; Raphael Guzman; Luigi Mariani; Jonathan Roth; Jehuda Soleman
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 8.  Glioma surgery with awake language mapping versus generalized anesthesia: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ling-Hao Bu; Jie Zhang; Jun-Feng Lu; Jin-Song Wu
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 9.  Antiepileptic Drugs in the Management of Cerebral Metastases.

Authors:  Meredith A Monsour; Patrick D Kelly; Lola B Chambless
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.509

10.  Passive functional mapping of receptive language areas using electrocorticographic signals.

Authors:  J R Swift; W G Coon; C Guger; P Brunner; M Bunch; T Lynch; B Frawley; A L Ritaccio; G Schalk
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.