Literature DB >> 23120306

Evaluation of improvement of hearing in type I tympanoplasty & its influencing factors.

Asok K Saha1, D M Munsi, S N Ghosh.   

Abstract

study included 40 patients treated for CSOM with central perforation. Only type I tympanoplasty was done in 30 patients with dry central perforation and simple mastoidectomy with type I tympanoplasty was performed in 10 patients with moist or discharging perforation. Type I tympanoplasty utilizing an underlay technique with TFG shows high probability of success (85%). Presence of bilateral perforations lowers the success rate (66.66%). Status of non-operated ear is a significant factor for success rate. An overall hearing gain of about 10db was achieved. Poor pre-operative hearing status of elderly adversely influences post-operative improvement of hearing. Typel tympanoplasty with simple mastoidectomy results excellent surgical success rate (100%) but gives less improvement of hearing (closure of A-B gap= 3.3db). In type I tympanoplasty alone surgical success rate drops to 80-75% but is offers more improvement of hearing (closure of A-B gap = 6.708 db).

Entities:  

Keywords:  CSOM; Hearing gain; influencing factors; type I tympanoplasty

Year:  2006        PMID: 23120306      PMCID: PMC3450409          DOI: 10.1007/BF03050833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  5 in total

1.  Bone conduction changes following successful tympanoplasty type I.

Authors:  E Ostfeld; C Bar-on; M Bergman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Allograft tympanoplasty type 1 in the childhood population.

Authors:  E P Hamans; P J Govaerts; T Somers; F E Offeciers
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.547

3.  Outcome of type-1 tympanoplasty.

Authors:  Fadl A Fadl
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.484

4.  Age and the prognosis of tympanoplasty type I.

Authors:  C F Tai; K Y Ho; K H Juan
Journal:  Kaohsiung J Med Sci       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.744

5.  Type I tympanoplasty: influencing factors.

Authors:  W Y Adkins; B White
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.325

  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  Outcome of Interlay Grafting in Type 1 Tympanoplasty for Large Central Perforation.

Authors:  B C Patil; P R Misale; R S Mane; A A Mohite
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-06-24

2.  Study of Myringoplasty in Wet and Dry Ears in Mucosal Type of Chronic Otitis Media.

Authors:  U P Santosh; K B Prashanth; Ms Sudhakar Rao
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-09-01

3.  Evaluation of Role of Mastoid Surgery in the Management of Safe Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media.

Authors:  Akriti Sharma; Nitish Baisakhiya; L N Garg; Gurchand Singh
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-10-13

4.  Which is Better for Management of Tympanic Membrane Perforation Temporalis Fascia or Fascia Lata Graft?

Authors:  Vikram Satyarthy; Sudhakar Vaidya; Apoorva Shakti; Anjana Agrawal
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-03-20

5.  A Prospective Study on Middle Ear Risk Index (MERI) and Outcome of Tympanoplasty with a Note on quality-of-Life (QOL).

Authors:  Lakshmi Shree Nallapaneni; Shyam Sudhakar Sudarsan; Srinivasan Krishnamoorthy
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-01-31

6.  Longitudinal Study of Type I Interlay Tympanoplasty.

Authors:  Manish Chandra; Satveer Singh Jassal
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-08-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.