Literature DB >> 23118381

Large diameter heads: is bigger always better?

J A Rodriguez1, P A Rathod.   

Abstract

Large femoral heads have been used with increasing frequency over the last decade. The prime reason is likely the effect of large heads on stability. The larger head neck ratio, combined with the increased jump distance of larger heads result in a greater arc of impingement free motion, and greater resistance to dislocation in a provocative position. Multiple studies have demonstrated clear clinical efficacy in diminishing dislocation rates with the use of large femoral heads. With crosslinked polyethylene, wear has been shown to be equivalent between larger and smaller heads. However, the stability advantages of increasing diameter beyond 38 mm have not been clearly demonstrated. More importantly, recent data implicates large heads in the increasing prevalence of groin pain and psoas impingement. There are clear benefits with larger femoral head diameters, but the advantages of diameters beyond 38 mm have not yet been demonstrated clinically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23118381     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B11.30508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  17 in total

1.  Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  A Zahar; A Rastogi; D Kendoff
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-12

2.  Modern trunnions are more flexible: a mechanical analysis of THA taper designs.

Authors:  David A Porter; Robert M Urban; Joshua J Jacobs; Jeremy L Gilbert; José A Rodriguez; H John Cooper
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Navigation is Equal to Estimation by Eye and Palpation in Preventing Psoas Impingement in THA.

Authors:  Markus Weber; Michael Woerner; Benedikt Messmer; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Multidirectional wear and impact-to-wear tests of phospholipid-polymer-grafted and vitamin E-blended crosslinked polyethylene: a pilot study.

Authors:  Masayuki Kyomoto; Toru Moro; Yoshio Takatori; Sakae Tanaka; Kazuhiko Ishihara
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Total hip arthroplasty instability in Italy.

Authors:  Francesco Falez; Matteo Papalia; Fabio Favetti; Gabriele Panegrossi; Filippo Casella; Gianluca Mazzotta
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Bony impingement depends on the bone morphology of the hip after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Takeshi Shoji; Yuji Yasunaga; Takuma Yamasaki; Ryo Mori; Michio Hamanishi; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Benefit and risk in short term after total hip arthroplasty by direct anterior approach combined with dual mobility cup.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Homma; Tomonori Baba; Hideo Kobayashi; Asuka Desroches; Hironori Ochi; Yu Ozaki; Mikio Matsumoto; Takahito Yuasa; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-06-16

8.  Low failure rate at short term for 40 mm heads and second generation triple annealed HCLPE liners in hybrid hip replacements.

Authors:  Rajkumar Thangaraj; Jan Kuiper; Ralph D Perkins
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-01-03

9.  Two year follow up of supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew Kay; Derek Klavas; Varan Haghshenas; Mimi Phan; Daniel Le
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 10.  Head-neck taper corrosion in hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  S Hussenbocus; D Kosuge; L B Solomon; D W Howie; R H Oskouei
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.