Literature DB >> 23117408

A Phase I/II trial design when response is unobserved in subjects with dose-limiting toxicity.

Thomas M Braun1, Shan Kang2, Jeremy Mg Taylor2.   

Abstract

We propose a Phase I/II trial design in which subjects with dose-limiting toxicity are not followed for response, leading to three possible outcomes for each subject: dose-limiting toxicity, absence of therapeutic response without dose-limiting toxicity, and presence of therapeutic response without dose-limiting toxicity. We define the latter outcome as a 'success,' and the goal of the trial is to identify the dose with the largest probability of success. This dose is commonly referred to as the most successful dose. We propose a design that accumulates information on subjects with regard to both dose-limiting toxicity and response conditional on no dose-limiting toxicity. Bayesian methods are used to update the estimates of dose-limiting toxicity and response probabilities when each subject is enrolled, and we use these methods to determine the dose level assigned to each subject. Due to the need to explore doses more fully, each subject is not necessarily assigned the current estimate of the most successful dose; our algorithm may instead assign a dose that is in a neighborhood of the current most successful dose. We examine the ability of our design to correctly identify the most successful dose in a variety of settings via simulation and compare the performance of our design to that of competing approaches.
© The Author(s) 2012.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dose-finding studies; adaptive design; early-phase clinical trials; most successful dose

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23117408      PMCID: PMC4096077          DOI: 10.1177/0962280212464541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  19 in total

1.  Optimal adaptive designs for binary response trials.

Authors:  W F Rosenberger; N Stallard; A Ivanova; C N Harper; M L Ricks
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Dose-finding designs for HIV studies.

Authors:  J O'Quigley; M D Hughes; T Fenton
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Phase-I/II study to evaluate dose limiting toxicity, maximum tolerated dose, and tolerability of bendamustine HCl in pre-treated patients with B-chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (Binet stages B and C) requiring therapy.

Authors:  T Lissitchkov; G Arnaudov; D Peytchev; Kh Merkle
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Determining a maximum-tolerated schedule of a cytotoxic agent.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun; Zheng Yuan; Peter F Thall
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  A strategy for dose-finding and safety monitoring based on efficacy and adverse outcomes in phase I/II clinical trials.

Authors:  P F Thall; K E Russell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Sequential designs for phase I clinical trials with late-onset toxicities.

Authors:  Y K Cheung; R Chappell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Identifying the most successful dose (MSD) in dose-finding studies in cancer.

Authors:  Sarah Zohar; John O'Quigley
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2006 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.894

8.  The bivariate continual reassessment method. extending the CRM to phase I trials of two competing outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2002-06

9.  Bayesian decision procedures for dose determining experiments.

Authors:  J Whitehead; H Brunier
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995 May 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 10.  Dose escalation methods in phase I cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Christophe Le Tourneau; J Jack Lee; Lillian L Siu
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  3 in total

1.  A decision-theoretic phase I-II design for ordinal outcomes in two cycles.

Authors:  Juhee Lee; Peter F Thall; Yuan Ji; Peter Müller
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Parametric Dose Standardization for Optimizing Two-Agent Combinations in a Phase I-II Trial with Ordinal Outcomes.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Hoang Q Nguyen; Ralph G Zinner
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 1.864

3.  Bayesian Dose-Finding in Two Treatment Cycles Based on the Joint Utility of Efficacy and Toxicity.

Authors:  Juhee Lee; Peter F Thall; Yuan Ji; Peter Müller
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 5.033

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.