Literature DB >> 23117306

Practice on an augmented reality/haptic simulator and library of virtual brains improves residents' ability to perform a ventriculostomy.

Rachel Yudkowsky1, Cristian Luciano, Pat Banerjee, Alan Schwartz, Ali Alaraj, G Michael Lemole, Fady Charbel, Kelly Smith, Silvio Rizzi, Richard Byrne, Bernard Bendok, David Frim.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Ventriculostomy is a neurosurgical procedure for providing therapeutic cerebrospinal fluid drainage. Complications may arise during repeated attempts at placing the catheter in the ventricle. We studied the impact of simulation-based practice with a library of virtual brains on neurosurgery residents' performance in simulated and live surgical ventriculostomies.
METHODS: Using computed tomographic scans of actual patients, we developed a library of 15 virtual brains for the ImmersiveTouch system, a head- and hand-tracked augmented reality and haptic simulator. The virtual brains represent a range of anatomies including normal, shifted, and compressed ventricles. Neurosurgery residents participated in individual simulator practice on the library of brains including visualizing the 3-dimensional location of the catheter within the brain immediately after each insertion. Performance of participants on novel brains in the simulator and during actual surgery before and after intervention was analyzed using generalized linear mixed models.
RESULTS: Simulator cannulation success rates increased after intervention, and live procedure outcomes showed improvement in the rate of successful cannulation on the first pass. However, the incidence of deeper, contralateral (simulator) and third-ventricle (live) placements increased after intervention. Residents reported that simulations were realistic and helpful in improving procedural skills such as aiming the probe, sensing the pressure change when entering the ventricle, and estimating how far the catheter should be advanced within the ventricle.
CONCLUSIONS: Simulator practice with a library of virtual brains representing a range of anatomies and difficulty levels may improve performance, potentially decreasing complications due to inexpert technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23117306     DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3182662c69

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Simul Healthc        ISSN: 1559-2332            Impact factor:   1.929


  17 in total

1.  Feasibility and accuracy of a voxel-based neuronavigation system with 3D image rendering in preoperative planning and as a learning tool for young neurosurgeons, exemplified by the anatomical localization of the superior sagittal sinus.

Authors:  Guenther C Feigl; Firas Thaher; Sören Danz; Marcos Tatagiba; Anne K Hickmann; Antje Fahrig; Tomaz Velnar; Marcel Kullmann
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.363

Review 2.  Image-guidance technology and the surgical resection of spinal column tumors.

Authors:  Bhargav Desai; Jonathan Hobbs; Grant Hartung; Guoren Xu; Ziya L Gokaslan; Andreas Linninger; Ankit I Mehta
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Virtual reality cerebral aneurysm clipping simulation with real-time haptic feedback.

Authors:  Ali Alaraj; Cristian J Luciano; Daniel P Bailey; Abdussalam Elsenousi; Ben Z Roitberg; Antonio Bernardo; P Pat Banerjee; Fady T Charbel
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 4.  The Insertion and Management of External Ventricular Drains: An Evidence-Based Consensus Statement : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society.

Authors:  Herbert I Fried; Barnett R Nathan; A Shaun Rowe; Joseph M Zabramski; Norberto Andaluz; Adarsh Bhimraj; Mary McKenna Guanci; David B Seder; Jeffrey M Singh
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  Improved Surgical Safety via Intraoperative Navigation for Transnasal Transsphenoidal Resection of Pituitary Adenomas.

Authors:  Rebecca L Achey; Michael Karsy; Mohammed A Azab; Jonathan Scoville; Bornali Kundu; Christian A Bowers; William T Couldwell
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-01-21

Review 6.  From papyrus leaves to bioprinting and virtual reality: history and innovation in anatomy.

Authors:  Bharti Bisht; Ashley Hope; Manash K Paul
Journal:  Anat Cell Biol       Date:  2019-08-26

7.  A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014.

Authors:  Arindam Dey; Mark Billinghurst; Robert W Lindeman; J Edward Swan
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2018-04-17

8.  Augmented reality in healthcare education: an integrative review.

Authors:  Egui Zhu; Arash Hadadgar; Italo Masiello; Nabil Zary
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Augmented reality in neurosurgery.

Authors:  Raniel Tagaytayan; Arpad Kelemen; Cecilia Sik-Lanyi
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 10.  Augmented reality in medical education: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kevin S Tang; Derrick L Cheng; Eric Mi; Paul B Greenberg
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2020-03-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.