Literature DB >> 23115217

Interocular suppression in normal and amblyopic vision: spatio-temporal properties.

Pi-Chun Huang1, Daniel H Baker, Robert F Hess.   

Abstract

We measured the properties of interocular suppression in strabismic amblyopes and compared these to dichoptic masking in binocularly normal observers. We used a dichoptic version of the well-established probed-sinewave paradigm that measured sensitivity to a brief target stimulus (one of four letters to be discriminated) in the amblyopic eye at different times relative to a suppression-inducing mask in the fixing eye. This was done using both sinusoidal steady state and transient approaches. The suppression-inducing masks were either modulations of luminance or contrast (full field, just overlaying the target, or just surrounding the target). Our results were interpreted using a descriptive model that included contrast gain control and spatio-temporal filtering prior to excitatory binocular combination. The suppression we measured, other than in magnitude, was not fundamentally different from normal dichoptic masking: lowpass spatio-temporal properties with similar contributions from both surround and overlay suppression.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23115217     DOI: 10.1167/12.11.29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  14 in total

1.  Steady-state contrast response functions provide a sensitive and objective index of amblyopic deficits.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Mathieu Simard; Dave Saint-Amour; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Early monocular defocus disrupts the normal development of receptive-field structure in V2 neurons of macaque monkeys.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Tao; Bin Zhang; Guofu Shen; Janice Wensveen; Earl L Smith; Shinji Nishimoto; Izumi Ohzawa; Yuzo M Chino
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Discriminating anisometropic amblyopia from myopia based on interocular inhibition.

Authors:  Wuli Jia; Jiawei Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu; Luis A Lesmes; Chang-Bing Huang
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Efferent influences on the bioelectrical activity of the retina in primates.

Authors:  Gonzalo Ortiz; J Vernon Odom; Christopher L Passaglia; Radouil T Tzekov
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Binocular summation and other forms of non-dominant eye contribution in individuals with strabismic amblyopia during habitual viewing.

Authors:  Brendan T Barrett; Gurvinder K Panesar; Andrew J Scally; Ian E Pacey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A complete investigation of monocular and binocular functions in clinically treated amblyopia.

Authors:  Wuxiao Zhao; Wu-Li Jia; Ge Chen; Yan Luo; Borong Lin; Qing He; Zhong-Lin Lu; Min Li; Chang-Bing Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Long-Range Interocular Suppression in Adults with Strabismic Amblyopia: A Pilot fMRI Study.

Authors:  Benjamin Thompson; Goro Maehara; Erin Goddard; Reza Farivar; Behzad Mansouri; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-08

8.  Influence of Artificially Generated Interocular Blur Difference on Fusion Stability Under Vergence Stress.

Authors:  Miroslav Dostalek; Karel Fliegel; Ladislav Dusek; Tomas Lukes; Jan Hejda; Michaela Duchackova; Jiri Hozman; Rudolf Autrata
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 0.957

9.  Attention in visually typical and amblyopic children.

Authors:  Priyanka V Ramesh; Mark A Steele; Lynne Kiorpes
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Dichoptic Spatial Contrast Sensitivity Reflects Binocular Balance in Normal and Stereoanomalous Subjects.

Authors:  Mirella Telles Salgueiro Barboni; Otto Alexander Maneschg; János Németh; Zoltán Zsolt Nagy; Zoltán Vidnyánszky; Éva M Bankó
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.