BACKGROUND: Ocular fundus examination is an important element of the neurological examination. However, direct ophthalmoscopy is difficult to perform without pupillary dilation and requires extensive practice to accurately recognize optic nerve and retinal abnormalities. Recent studies have suggested that digital retinal photography can replace direct ophthalmoscopy in many settings. REVIEW SUMMARY: Ocular fundus imaging is routinely used to document and monitor disease progression in ophthalmology. Advances in optical technology have made it easier to obtain high-quality retinal imaging, even without pupillary dilation. Retinal photography has a high sensitivity, specificity, and interexamination/intraexamination agreement compared with in-person ophthalmologist examination, suggesting that photographs can be used in lieu of ophthalmoscopy in many clinical situations. Nonmydriatic retinal photography has recently gained relevance as a helpful tool for diagnosing neuro-ophthalmologic disorders in the emergency department. In addition, several population-based studies have used retinal imaging to relate ophthalmic abnormalities to the risk of hypertension, renal dysfunction, cardiovascular mortality, subclinical and clinical stroke, and cognitive impairment. The possibility of telemedical consultation offered by digital retinal photography has already increased access to timely and accurate subspecialty care, particularly for underserved areas. CONCLUSIONS: Retinal photography (even without pupillary dilation) has become increasingly available to medical fields outside of ophthalmology, allowing for faster and more accurate diagnosis of various ocular, neurological, and systemic disorders. The potential for telemedicine may provide the additional benefits of improving access to appropriate urgent consultation in both clinical and research settings.
BACKGROUND: Ocular fundus examination is an important element of the neurological examination. However, direct ophthalmoscopy is difficult to perform without pupillary dilation and requires extensive practice to accurately recognize optic nerve and retinal abnormalities. Recent studies have suggested that digital retinal photography can replace direct ophthalmoscopy in many settings. REVIEW SUMMARY: Ocular fundus imaging is routinely used to document and monitor disease progression in ophthalmology. Advances in optical technology have made it easier to obtain high-quality retinal imaging, even without pupillary dilation. Retinal photography has a high sensitivity, specificity, and interexamination/intraexamination agreement compared with in-person ophthalmologist examination, suggesting that photographs can be used in lieu of ophthalmoscopy in many clinical situations. Nonmydriatic retinal photography has recently gained relevance as a helpful tool for diagnosing neuro-ophthalmologic disorders in the emergency department. In addition, several population-based studies have used retinal imaging to relate ophthalmic abnormalities to the risk of hypertension, renal dysfunction, cardiovascular mortality, subclinical and clinical stroke, and cognitive impairment. The possibility of telemedical consultation offered by digital retinal photography has already increased access to timely and accurate subspecialty care, particularly for underserved areas. CONCLUSIONS: Retinal photography (even without pupillary dilation) has become increasingly available to medical fields outside of ophthalmology, allowing for faster and more accurate diagnosis of various ocular, neurological, and systemic disorders. The potential for telemedicine may provide the additional benefits of improving access to appropriate urgent consultation in both clinical and research settings.
Authors: George A Williams; Ingrid U Scott; Julia A Haller; Albert M Maguire; Dennis Marcus; H Richard McDonald Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: T Y Wong; R Klein; D J Couper; L S Cooper; E Shahar; L D Hubbard; M R Wofford; A R Sharrett Journal: Lancet Date: 2001-10-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Tien Yin Wong; Ronald Klein; F Javier Nieto; Barbara E K Klein; A Richey Sharrett; Stacy M Meuer; Larry D Hubbard; James M Tielsch Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: M Kamran Ikram; Frank Jan de Jong; Johannes R Vingerling; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Albert Hofman; Monique M B Breteler; Paulus T V M de Jong Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Victor T T Chan; Tiffany H K Tso; Fangyao Tang; Clement Tham; Vincent Mok; Christopher Chen; Tien Y Wong; Carol Y Cheung Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2017-11-06 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Jason Philip Appleton; Andreea Ilinca; Arne Lindgren; Andreas Puschmann; Majed Hbahbih; Khurram A Siddiqui; Rajith de Silva; Matthew Jones; Richard Butterworth; Mark Willmot; Tom Hayton; Michael Lunn; David Nicholl Journal: BMJ Qual Improv Rep Date: 2015-11-05
Authors: Sarah McGrory; James R Cameron; Enrico Pellegrini; Claire Warren; Fergus N Doubal; Ian J Deary; Baljean Dhillon; Joanna M Wardlaw; Emanuele Trucco; Thomas J MacGillivray Journal: Alzheimers Dement (Amst) Date: 2016-12-02