| Literature DB >> 23112906 |
Arnaud Laillou1, Le Bach Mai, Le Thi Hop, Nguyen Cong Khan, Dora Panagides, Frank Wieringa, Jacques Berger, Regina Moench-Pfanner.
Abstract
Targeted fortification programs for infants and young children are an effective strategy to prevent micronutrient deficiencies in developing countries, but the role of large-scale fortification of staple foods and condiments is less clear. Dietary modeling in children aged 6-60 months was undertaken, based on food consumption patterns described in the 2009 national food consumption survey, using a 24-h recall method. Consumption data showed that the median intake of a child for iron, vitamin A and zinc, as a proportion of the Vietnamese Recommended Dietary Allowance (VRDA), is respectively 16%-48%, 14%-49% and 36%-46%, (depending on the age group). Potential fortification vehicles, such as rice, fish/soy sauces and vegetable oil are consumed daily in significant amounts (median: 170 g/capita/day, 4 g/capita/day and 6 g/capita/day, respectively) by over 40% of the children. Vegetable oil fortification could contribute to an additional vitamin A intake of 21%-24% of VRDA recommended nutrient intake, while fortified rice could support the intakes of all the other micronutrients (14%-61% for iron, 4%-11% for zinc and 33%-49% of folate requirements). Other food vehicles, such as wheat flour, which is consumed by 16% of children, could also contribute to efforts to increase micronutrient intakes, although little impact on the prevalence of micronutrient deficiencies can be expected if used alone. The modeling suggests that fortification of vegetable oil, rice and sauces would be an effective strategy to address micronutrient gaps and deficiencies in young children.Entities:
Keywords: Vietnam; fortification; infant; recommended dietary allowance; strategy; young children
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23112906 PMCID: PMC3475228 DOI: 10.3390/nu4091151
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Standards used for modeling purposes of an integrated large-scale fortification strategy in Vietnam.
| Food vehicle | Standards |
|---|---|
|
| 40 mg/kg of iron as NaFeEDTA; 50 mg/kg of zinc and 5 mg/kg of folic acid |
|
| 40 mg/kg of iron as micronized ferrous pyrophosphate; 5 mg/kg of zinc and 0.5 mg/kg of folic acid |
|
| 75 IU of retinyl palmitate per gram of vegetable oil |
|
| 2.5 mg of iron as NaFeEDTA per 10 mL of sauces |
Macro- and micronutrient intake (in g/capita/day) by rural and urban residence, sex, age group and socioeconomic group (median and 25th, 75th percentile) 1,2,3,4.
|
| Energy (Kcal) | Protein (g) | carbohydrates (g) | Lipid (g) | Iron (mg) | Zinc (mg) | Vitamin A (µg retinol activity equivalent) | Vitamin B1 (mg) | Vitamin B2 (mg) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 415 | 871.2 (617.9; 1199.3) | 33.1 (22.0; 45.0) | 140.7 (101.3; 199.9) | 15.4 (8.2; 23.8) | 4.8 (3.1; 7.4) | 4.3 (3.0; 6.2) | 182.8 (40.0; 387.9) | 0.5 (0.3; 0.7) | 0.3 (0.2; 0.5) |
|
| ||||||||||
| Boy | 212 | 884.2 (642.5; 1229.3) | 34.7 (22.7; 46.0) | 144.8 (103.5; 217.7) | 16.3 (8.5; 23.8) | 4.9 (3.2; 7.3) | 4.5 (3.1; 6.5) | 177.8 (40.3; 383.8) | 0.5 (0.3; 0.7) | 0.3 (0.2; 0.5) |
| Girl | 203 | 830.3 (601.0; 1126.4) | 32.3 (21.5; 44.8) | 131.7 (97.3; 185.8) | 14.3 (7.3; 23.8) | 4.7 (2.9; 7.4) | 4.2 (2.9; 6.1) | 190.7 (37.1; 397.3) | 0.5 (0.3; 0.7) | 0.4 (0.2; 0.6) |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| (6–11.9) | 48 | 597.8 (327.4; 871.0) | 22.7 (11.3; 36.0) | 69.6 (37.8; 110.6) | 11.5 (3.8; 21.6) | 3.0 (1.6; 4.1) | 3.0 (1.7; 6.1) | 57.7 (4.5; 224.1) | 0.3 (0.1; 0.7) | 0.2 (0.1; 0.4) |
| (12–23.9) | 97 | 760.7 (555.5; 1143.2) | 27.2 (17.8; 40.9) | 111.8 (82.3; 202.5) | 14.9 (7.8; 23.4) | 3.8 (2.4; 5.5) | 4.0 (2.4; 5.7) | 174.6 (49.4; 284.9) | 0.4 (0.2; 0.8) | 0.3 (0.1; 0.5) |
| (24–35.9) | 94 | 883.2 (647.0; 1173.8) | 34.7 (21.6; 45.5) | 148.4 (117.0; 189.8) | 14.4 (8.2; 25.7) | 5.3 (3.6; 8.3) | 4.1 (2.9; 6.2) | 174.4 (39.5; 430.7) | 0.4 (0.3; 0.7) | 0.3 (0.2; 0.6) |
| (36–59.9) | 176 | 957.9 (732.5; 1269.2) | 35.6 (25.6; 48.5) | 159.1 (118.6; 225.4) | 16.3 (9.8; 23.7) | 5.9 (4.2; 8.6) | 4.7 (3.6; 7.0) | 220.2 (78.1; 448.6) | 0.6 (0.3; 0.8) | 0.4 (0.2; 0.6) |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| Extremely poor | 100 | 733.8 (578.0; 1039.7) | 23.4 (17.9; 35.5) | 139.3 (103.5; 192.6) | 9.4 (3.0; 19.7) | 3.9 (2.7; 5.8) | 3.5 (2.2; 4.9) | 121.8 (3.0; 273.5) | 0.3 (0.2; 0.6) | 0.2 (0.1; 0.4) |
| Poor | 70 | 990.0 (737.8; 1225.0) | 36.6 (25.5; 47.0) | 161.1 (119.0; 250.8) | 16.3 (11.6; 22.6) | 5.4 (3.7; 7.2) | 4.7 (3.5; 6.6) | 199.9 (73.9; 449.4) | 0.6 (0.3; 0.8) | 0.4 (0.2; 0.6) |
| Intermediate low | 60 | 883.2 (608.5; 1176.4) | 34.8 (22.1; 48.0) | 136.3 (101.4; 188.4) | 16.2 (8.6; 26.8) | 4.9 (2.7; 8.0) | 4.6 (2.9; 6.4) | 153.7 (32.9; 350.4) | 0.5 (0.3; 0.8) | 0.4 (0.1; 0.6) |
| Intermediate high | 75 | 833.1 (551.7; 1247.3) | 34.8 (23.5; 47.4) | 132.7 (80.4; 173.3) | 18.5 (8.9; 28.7) | 5.0 (2.9; 8.2) | 4.5 (2.9; 6.9) | 259.9 (103.2; 430.7) | 0.6 (0.3; 0.8) | 0.4 (0.2; 0.6) |
| Wealthy | 110 | 900.7 (686.3; 1248.0) | 36.3 (25.4; 48.6) | 134.9 (99.2; 214.0) | 16.4 (10.0; 26.1) | 5.1 (3.8; 8.1) | 4.8 (3.3; 6.4) | 186.7 (59.9; 430.3) | 0.5 (0.3; 0.7) | 0.4 (0.2; 0.6) |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| Rural | 223 | 916.7 (613.7; 1199.3) | 32.8 (21.5; 44.1) | 151.4 (99.9; 201.0) | 16.1 (8.5; 23.6) | 5.0 (3.2; 7.4) | 4.3 (3.1; 6.4) | 177.5(32.4; 372.0) | 0.5 (0.3; 0.7) | 0.3 (0.2; 0.5) |
| Urban | 192 | 804.2 (625.5; 1209.0) | 34.4 (22.4; 47.1) | 132.9 (102.0; 197.4) | 14.7 (8.0; 24.7) | 4.7 (3.1; 7.3) | 4.4 (2.9; 6.2) | 183.3 (53.0; 401.0) | 0.5 (0.3; 0.8) | 0.3 (0.2; 0.6) |
|
|
1 median (25th percentile; 75th percentile); 2 test of Kruskal-Wallis or Mann-Whitney U-test on the median; 3 no data exists for folate in the Vietnamese food table; 4 not including intakes from breastfeeding.
Figure 1Percentage of children achieving the VRDA for retinol, zinc, iron, vitamin B1 and vitamin B2 by age group.
Percentage of Vietnamese children consuming selected food, by socioeconomic status (quintile), sex, age groups and residence in the previous 24 h.
|
| Rice | Wheat flour | Vegetable oil | Sauces | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Extremely poor | 100 | 100.0% | 19.0% | 18.0% | 47.0% |
| Poor | 70 | 100.0% | 15.7% | 34.3% | 54.3% |
| Intermediate low | 60 | 96.7% | 20.0% | 41.7% | 50.0% |
| Intermediate high | 75 | 97.3% | 12.0% | 45.3% | 50.7% |
| Wealthy | 110 | 96.4% | 15.5% | 52.7% | 52.7% |
| ns | ns | ||||
| Sex | |||||
| Boys | 212 | 100.0% | 16.5% | 41.5% | 52.4% |
| Girls | 203 | 96.6% | 16.3% | 35.0% | 49.3% |
| ns | ns | ns | |||
|
| |||||
| (6–11.9) | 48 | 91.7% | 4.2% | 45.8% | 62.5% |
| (12–23.9) | 97 | 100.0% | 17.5% | 28.9% | 47.4% |
| (24–35.9) | 94 | 96.8% | 9.6% | 38.3% | 42.6% |
| (36–59.9) | 176 | 100.0% | 22.7% | 41.5% | 54.0% |
| ns | ns | ||||
| Rural | 223 | 100.0% | 18.8% | 33.6% | 51.1% |
| Urban | 192 | 96.9% | 13.5% | 43.8% | 50.5% |
| ns | ns | ||||
|
| 415 | 98.6% | 16.4% | 38.3% | 50.8% |
Note: 1 Chi square test; ns: non-significant.
Median consumption (25th percentile; 75th percentile) for consumers of selected foods by socioeconomic status, sex, age groups and residence (in g/capita/day) 1.
|
| Rice |
| Wheat flour |
| Vegetable oil |
| Sauces | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 408 | 170.0 (110.0; 250.0) | 68 | 43.0 (14.3; 76.0) | 159 | 6.0 (3.0; 10.0) | 211 | 4.0 (2.0; 9.0) |
| Sex | ||||||||
| Boy | 212 | 180.0 (120.0; 263.0) | 35 | 50.0 (15.0; 80.0) | 88 | 6.0 (3.0; 10.0) | 111 | 4.0 (2.0; 8.0) |
| Girl | 196 | 157.0 (104.0; 240.0) | 33 | 35.0 (12.5; 75.5) | 71 | 6.0 (3.0; 9.0) | 100 | 4.5 (2.5; 9.0) |
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Extremely poor | 100 | 165.0 (111.8; 243.0) | 19 | 50.0 (14.0; 76.0) | 18 | 5.0 (3.0; 9.8) | 47 | 4.0 (2.0; 7.0) |
| Poor | 70 | 204.4 (126.0; 295.0) | 11 | 40.0 (12.0; 110.0) | 24 | 6.5 (4.0; 11.5) | 38 | 5.0 (2.0; 10.5) |
| Intermediate low | 58 | 170.0 (117.8; 254.0) | 12 | 45.0 (15.6; 92.8) | 25 | 5.0 (3.0; 9.0) | 30 | 6.0 (2.0; 8.3) |
| Intermediate high | 73 | 150.0 (100.0; 219.0) | 9 | 35.0 (12.0; 51.5) | 34 | 6.0 (4.0; 9.3) | 38 | 5.0 (3.0; 9.0) |
| Wealthy | 106 | 164.0 (108.8; 247.8) | 17 | 50.0 (18.5; 67.5) | 58 | 5.5 (3.0; 10.6) | 58 | 4.0 (2.0; 9.5) |
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| (6–11.9) | 44 | 70.0 (47.5; 120.0) | 2 | 6.0 (6.0; 6.0) | 22 | 5.5 (2.0; 15.0) | 30 | 2.5 (2.0; 7.5) |
| (12–23.9) | 97 | 125.0 (93.5; 250.0) | 17 | 40.0 (16.0; 75.5) | 28 | 6.0 (3.3; 13.2) | 46 | 4.0 (2.0; 6.0) |
| (24–35.9) | 91 | 185.0 (124.0; 230.0) | 9 | 50.0 (23.5; 88.8) | 36 | 5.5 (4.0; 9.8) | 40 | 3.5 (1.6; 8.8) |
| (36–59.9) | 176 | 195.0 (136.5; 284.5) | 40 | 47.0 (12.8; 84.5) | 73 | 6.0 (3.0; 9.0) | 95 | 5.0 (3.0; 10.0) |
|
|
| |||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Rural | 223 | 175.0 (105.0; 270.0) | 42 | 47.5 (19.5; 81.9) | 75 | 6.0 (3.0; 15.0) | 114 | 5.0 (2.0; 11.3) |
| Urban | 186 | 167.5 (114.8; 247.8) | 26 | 35.0 (12.0; 71.3) | 84 | 5.0 (3.0; 9.0) | 97 | 4.0 (2.0; 7.0) |
|
|
1 median (25th percentile; 75th percentile); 2 test of Kruskal-Wallis or Mann-Whitney U-test on the median.
Estimated daily contribution from individual fortified foods (using median amounts and proposed fortification levels consumed daily by children) 1,2.
| Nutrient contribution per child from individual food fortification | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age groups | Fortified wheat flour | Fortified sauces | Fortified vegetable oil | Fortified rice | ||||
| Iron (mg/day) | Zinc (mg/day) | Folate (µg/day) | Iron (mg/day) | Retinyl palmitate (µg RAE/day) | Iron (mg/day) | Zinc (mg/day) | Folate (µg/day) | |
|
| 0.2 (0.2–0.2) | 0.3 (0.3–0.3) | 26 (26–26) | 0.6 (0.5–1.8) | 86.6 (31.5–236.3) | 2.7 (1.8–4.6) | 0.3 (0.2–0.6) | 30 (20–51) |
|
| 1.5 (0.6–2.9) | 1.9 (0.8–3.6) | 170 (68–321) | 1.0 (0.5–1.4) | 94.5 (52.0–207.9) | 4.8 (3.6–9.5) | 0.6 (0.4–1.2) | 53 (40–106) |
|
| 1.9 (0.9–3.4) | 2.4 (1.1–4.2) | 213 (100–377) | 0.8 (0.4–2.1) | 86.6 (63.0–154.4) | 7.0 (4.7–8.7) | 0.9 (0.6–1.1) | 79 (53–98) |
|
| 1.8 (0.5–3.2) | 2.2 (0.6–4.0) | 200 (54–359) | 1.2 (0.7–2.4) | 94.5 (47.3–141.8) | 7.4 (5.2–10.8) | 0.9 (0.6–1.4) | 83 (58–121) |
1 Values are medians (25th and 75th percentiles); 2 assuming 5% losses for iron, 30% losses for retinyl palmitate and 5% losses for zinc.
Figure 2Percentage of VRDA for retinol, zinc, iron and folate contributed by potential consumed fortified food vehicles.