| Literature DB >> 23110249 |
Xin Zhou1, Xinguo Liu, Xin Zhang, Rong Zhou, Yang He, Qiang Li, Zhenhua Wang, Hong Zhang.
Abstract
Although it is well known that there are mutation hot spots in mtDNA, whether there are damage hot spots remain elusive. In this study, the regional DNA damage of mitochondrial genome after ionizing radiation was determined by real-time quantitative PCR. The mtDNA damage level was found to be dose-dependent and regional unequal. The control region was the most susceptible region to oxidative damage. GGG, as an typical hole trap during charge transport, was found to be disproportionally enriched in the control region. A total of 107 vertebrate mitochondrial genomes were then analyzed to testify whether the GGG enrichment in control region was evolutionary conserved. Surprisingly, the triple G enrichment can be observed in most of the homeothermal animals, while the majority of heterothermic animals showed no triple G enrichment. These results indicated that the triple G enrichment in control region was related to the mitochondrial metabolism during evolution.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23110249 PMCID: PMC3483021 DOI: 10.1038/srep00780
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Radiation-induced dose-dependent and regional specific mtDNA damage.
(A) Quantification of mtDNA damage per 10 kb DNA by SLR rt-PCR amplification of total DNA isolated from MCF-7 cells exposed to 2–8 Gy X-ray irradiation showing an steadily increasing mtDNA damage with increased dosage in all tested mtDNA regions. Error bars designate standard deviation (at least three independent experiments). Region 14898-151 and 16488-1677 exhibited significant increased mitochondrial damage, overlapping the control region of human mitochondrial genome. (B) Quantitative measurement of mitochondrial DNA damage using Long-run quantitative PCR. Representation of the DNA lesions of the 8.9 kb and 9.4 kb mitochondrial fragments. Lesion frequencies of treated samples were calculated per amplicon size and expressed per 10 kb of mitochondrial genome. Error bars represent the SD, each done in at least triplicate. *Statistical significant at p < 0.05; **Statistical significant at p < 0.01.
Figure 2Computational scanning of the triple G across the mitochondrial genome.
The 16569 bp mtDNA was divided into 9 sections, each contained an equal number of 1841 bp fragment. The scanning began at position 14898 according to the SLR rt-PCR data (A) or began at position 16024 of the beginning of control region (B). The scanning program was design by C language.
Figure 3Computational score of the abundance ratio of triple G in D-loop region of 107 vertebrates.
The scanning program was design by C language. The phylogenetic tree of vertebrates were constructed based on 107 complete vertebrate mitochondrial genome available in GenBank.
| MtDNA region | Primer sequences | PCR efficiency (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5464–7287 | F: TTACCACGCTACTCCTACCTAT | 1823 | 83.2 |
| R: GAGAAATGAATGAGCCTACAGAT | |||
| 4487–6286 | F: ACCCGTCATCTACTCTACCATC | 1799 | 79.4 |
| R: ACTGTTCAACCTGTTCCTGCT | |||
| 7266–9077 | F: TCTGTAGGCTCATTCATTTCTC | 1811 | 88 |
| R: ATGGTTGATATTGCTAGGGTG | |||
| 8910–10648 | F : CTTACCACAAGGCACACCTACA | 1738 | 85.1 |
| R:ATGGACCACAAGGCACACCTACA | |||
| 10294–12107 | F:TACAAACAACTAACCTGCCACT | 1815 | 83.6 |
| R: GTTGAGGGATAGGAGGAGAAT | |||
| 11977–13830 | F:CTCCCTCTACATATTTACCACAAC | 1853 | 87.8 |
| R:AAGTCCTAGGAAAGTGACAGCGA | |||
| 13902–14979 | F: CTCCAACATACTCGGATTCTAC | 1047 | 92 |
| R: ATTCAGCCATAATTTACGTCTC | |||
| 14898–151 | F: TAGCCATGCACTACTCACCAGA | 1849 | 84.8 |
| R:GGATGAGGCAGGAATCAAAGAC | |||
| 16488–1677 | F: CTGTATCCGACATCTGGTTCCT | 1785 | 81.1 |
| R : GTTTAGCTCAGAGCGGTCAAGT | |||
| 1196–2998 | F: AGAGGAGCCTGTTCTGTAATCG | 1802 | 84.7 |
| R: ATCCAACATCGAGGTCGTAAA | |||
| 2716–4658 | F: GACGAGAAGACCCTATGGAGC | 1942 | 78.7 |
| R: TTGCGTGAGGAAATACTTGATGG | |||
| 14620–14841[ | F:CCCCACAAACCCCAT TACTAAACCCA | 222 | 99.5 |
| R:TTTCATCATGCGGAGATGTTGGATGG | |||
| 401–490 | F: CACAGACATCATAACAAAAAATTTCC | 90 | 99.9 |
| R: GGTGTTAGGGTTCTTTGTTTTTGG | |||
| 3459–3562 | F: ACGCCATAAAACTCTTCACCAAAG | 104 | 98.9 |
| R: TAGTAGAAGAGCGATGGTGAGAGCTA | |||
| 8456–8557 | F:ACAAACTACCACCTACCTCCC | 102 | 99.9 |
| R:CAATGAATGAAGCGAACAGAT | |||
| 15015–6140 | F:ATTCTTTATCTGCCTCTTCCTAC | 9417 | n/a |
| R: TCGTTGACCTCGTCTGTTATG | |||
| 5999–14841 | F:TCTAAGCCTCCTTATTCGAGCCGA | 8843 | n/a |
| R:TTTCATCATGCGGAGATGTTGGATGG |
Figure 4Reduced amplification of different amplicons after ionizing radiation.
Analysis was performed immediately after exposure to radiation. IR/non-IR ratios were calculated by dividing the IR-damaged mtDNA signal for amplicon by the untreated control signal and expressing the ratio as a percentage of the untreated control set at 100%. Error bars represent the SD, each done in at least triplicate. *Statistical significant at p < 0.05.