Literature DB >> 23109626

Revision total hip replacement using the cement-in-cement technique for the acetabular component: technique and results for 60 hips.

K Brogan1, J Charity, A Sheeraz, S L Whitehouse, A J Timperley, J R Howell, M J W Hubble.   

Abstract

The technique of femoral cement-in-cement revision is well established, but there are no previous series reporting its use on the acetabular side at the time of revision total hip replacement. We describe the technique and report the outcome of 60 consecutive acetabular cement-in-cement revisions in 59 patients at a mean follow-up of 8.5 years (5 to 12). All had a radiologically and clinically well-fixed acetabular cement mantle at the time of revision. During the follow-up 29 patients died, but no hips were lost to follow-up. The two most common indications for acetabular revision were recurrent dislocation (46, 77%) and to complement femoral revision (12, 20%). Of the 60 hips, there were two cases of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component (3.3%) requiring re-revision. No other hip was clinically or radiologically loose (96.7%) at the latest follow-up. One hip was re-revised for infection, four for recurrent dislocation and one for disarticulation of a constrained component. At five years the Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 100% for aseptic loosening and 92.2% (95% CI 84.8 to 99.6), with revision for any cause as the endpoint. These results support the use of cement-in-cement revision on the acetabular side in appropriate cases. Theoretical advantages include preservation of bone stock, reduced operating time, reduced risk of complications and durable fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23109626     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B11.29415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  3 in total

1.  The use of the Explant® device in metal backed Exeter™ acetabular component revision.

Authors:  B P Kent; E C Matthews; S M Blake
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  The cement-bone bond is weaker than cement-cement bond in cement-in-cement revision arthroplasty. A comparative biomechanical study.

Authors:  Marcin Ceynowa; Krzysztof Zerdzicki; Pawel Klosowski; Maciej Zrodowski; Rafal Pankowski; Marek Roclawski; Tomasz Mazurek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Two stage cementation and screw augmentation of large acetabular defects in low demand patients: Early results and surgical technique.

Authors:  Mohamed Mussa; Varun Dewan; Eric Isbister
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-09-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.