Literature DB >> 2310933

Comparison of catheter surface morphologies.

A J Cox1.   

Abstract

The surface morphologies of different generic types of Foley catheter have been investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The characteristic features of each material are illustrated and it is shown that distinct differences exist between the inner and outer surfaces of latex-based catheters; these differences are attributed to the methods of manufacture. The possible relations between morphology and performance in situ are discussed.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2310933     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1990.tb14662.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Urol        ISSN: 0007-1331


  6 in total

1.  Why are Foley catheters so vulnerable to encrustation and blockage by crystalline bacterial biofilm?

Authors:  David Stickler; Robert Young; Gwennan Jones; Nora Sabbuba; Nicola Morris
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2003-07-11

2.  Characterisation of the internal and external surfaces of four types of Foley catheter using SEM and profilometry.

Authors:  E L Lawrence; I G Turner
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Infection of catheterised patients: bacterial colonisation of encrusted Foley catheters shown by scanning electron microscopy.

Authors:  A J Cox; D W Hukins; T M Sutton
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1989

4.  A district urinary catheter policy. Why have one?

Authors:  T F Chen; E Robinson; S R Payne; E Robinson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 5.  Complicated catheter-associated urinary tract infections due to Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis.

Authors:  S M Jacobsen; D J Stickler; H L T Mobley; M E Shirtliff
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  PDMS and DLC-coated unidirectional valves for artificial urinary sphincters: Opening performance after 126 days of immersion in urine.

Authors:  Tommaso Mazzocchi; Gioia Lucarini; Irene Roehrer; Arianna Menciassi; Leonardo Ricotti
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 3.405

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.