Literature DB >> 2560278

Infection of catheterised patients: bacterial colonisation of encrusted Foley catheters shown by scanning electron microscopy.

A J Cox1, D W Hukins, T M Sutton.   

Abstract

The surfaces of 32 encrusted urinary catheters were examined by scanning electron microscopy to investigate the association of bacteria with the encrusting deposits. Deposits consisted of struvite crystals surrounded by aggregates of very small crystallites of hydroxyapatite. Underneath these minerals there was a layer of closely packed bacteria. Impressions of bacteria were also observed in hydroxyapatite. Crystals were often engulfed by the bacterial layer, which thus appeared to bind the crystals to each other and to the catheter surface. This thick layer of bacteria associated with crystals may protect both the bacteria from antibiotics and the crystals from acidic bladder washout solutions intended to dissolve them. Furthermore, the existence of this sessile population explains why urease-producing bacteria are not invariably detected in the urine of patients with encrusted catheters. The observation of this bacterial layer (or "biofilm") by scanning electron microscopy provided direct evidence for infection being implicated in catheter encrustation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2560278     DOI: 10.1007/BF00510523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  21 in total

1.  The management of indwelling catheters.

Authors:  J C Brocklehurst; S Brocklehurst
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1978-04

2.  An enzymatic method to make struvite crystals.

Authors:  J M Miller; A W Opher
Journal:  Invest Urol       Date:  1974-03

3.  Urease. The primary cause of infection-induced urinary stones.

Authors:  D P Griffith; D M Musher; C Itin
Journal:  Invest Urol       Date:  1976-03

4.  Bacterial changes in the urine samples of patients with long-term indwelling catheters.

Authors:  R B Breitenbucher
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1984-08

5.  Urinary pH and the indwelling catheter.

Authors:  A Norberg; B Norberg; K Lundbeck; U Parkhede
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.384

6.  Effect of catheter replacement on bacterial counts in urine aspirated from indwelling catheters.

Authors:  M Rubin; S A Berger; F N Zodda; R Gruenwald
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Surface structure of unused and used catheters. A scanning electron microscopic study.

Authors:  H Axelsson; J Schönebeck; B Winblad
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1977

8.  Ureaplasma urealyticum and upper urinary tract stones.

Authors:  H Hedelin; J E Brorson; L Grenabo; S Pettersson
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1984-06

9.  The problem of catheter encrustation.

Authors:  A W Bruce; S S Sira; A F Clark; S A Awad
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1974-08-03       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  An ecological study of infected urinary stone genesis in an animal model.

Authors:  J C Nickel; M Olson; R J McLean; S K Grant; J W Costerton
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1987-01
View more
  6 in total

1.  Bacterial migration along solid surfaces.

Authors:  G Harkes; J Dankert; J Feijen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  [Bladder catheterization in nursing care. An unresolved problem! Initiative to build a guideline].

Authors:  B Liedl; J Gleissner; B Göckel-Beining; H J Knopf; I Kopp; S Lenk; K Naber; C Tschuschke; H J Piechota
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  A sensor to detect the early stages in the development of crystalline Proteus mirabilis biofilm on indwelling bladder catheters.

Authors:  D J Stickler; S M Jones; G O Adusei; M G Waters
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Applications from bacterial adhesion and biofilm studies in relation to urogenital tissues and biomaterials: a review.

Authors:  G Reid
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol       Date:  1994-03

5.  Proteus mirabilis biofilms and the encrustation of urethral catheters.

Authors:  D Stickler; L Ganderton; J King; J Nettleton; C Winters
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1993

6.  Encrusted and incarcerated urinary bladder catheter: what are the options?

Authors:  Christopher C K Ho; Yugasaravanan Khandasamy; Praveen Singam; Eng Hong Goh; Zulkifli M Zainuddin
Journal:  Libyan J Med       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 1.657

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.