Literature DB >> 23108732

Different episiotomy techniques, postpartum perineal pain, and blood loss: an observational study.

Kathrine Fodstad1, Katariina Laine, Anne Cathrine Staff.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The lateral episiotomy technique has been postulated to cause more postpartum perineal pain and blood loss compared to the midline and mediolateral episiotomy technique. The aim of the study was to explore the association with postpartum perineal pain and blood loss between different episiotomy techniques.
METHODS: Clinical evaluation of episiotomy was performed 0-3 days after delivery on 300 participating women. Episiotomy technique was classified by millimeter distance from the incision point to the posterior fourchette and by angle from the sagittal plane in degrees. Postpartum perineal pain was scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS) the first day after delivery. Blood loss data were collected from medical charts. Different episiotomy techniques and different episiotomy incision point groups were compared in relation to perineal pain perception and blood loss.
RESULTS: We found no difference between midline, mediolateral, and lateral episiotomy techniques in perineal pain perception the first postpartum day (p = 0.74) or in estimated blood loss (p = 0.38). No differences were found in perineal pain or blood loss between midline and lateral incision points. Mediolateral angles were significantly narrower than lateral angles (p < 0.005). Physicians performed longer episiotomies than midwives (p < 0.005), but episiotomy angle did not vary between professions (p = 0.075).
CONCLUSIONS: No differences in perineal pain perception the first postpartum day and no differences in estimated blood loss were found when comparing different episiotomy techniques or when comparing midline and lateral incision points.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23108732     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-012-1960-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  28 in total

Review 1.  Classification of episiotomy: towards a standardisation of terminology.

Authors:  V Kalis; K Laine; J W de Leeuw; K M Ismail; D G Tincello
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 6.531

2.  Episiotomy rates around the world: an update.

Authors:  Ian D Graham; Guillermo Carroli; Christine Davies; Jennifer Mary Medves
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.689

Review 3.  ACOG Practice Bulletin. Episiotomy. Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists. Number 71, April 2006.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Episiotomy and perineal repair practices among obstetricians in Greece.

Authors:  Themos Grigoriadis; Stavros Athanasiou; Antonia Zisou; Aris Antsaklis
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 3.561

5.  The incision angle of mediolateral episiotomy before delivery and after repair.

Authors:  Vladimir Kalis; Jaroslava Karbanova; Miroslav Horak; Libor Lobovsky; Milena Kralickova; Zdenek Rokyta
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 3.561

6.  High episiotomy rate protects from obstetric anal sphincter ruptures: a birth register-study on delivery intervention policies in Finland.

Authors:  Sari Räisänen; Katri Vehviläinen-Julkunen; Mika Gissler; Seppo Heinonen
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  A comparison between midline and mediolateral episiotomies.

Authors:  P M Coats; K K Chan; M Wilkins; R J Beard
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1980-05

8.  Risk factors for third-degree perineal tears in vaginal delivery, with an analysis of episiotomy types.

Authors:  B Bodner-Adler; K Bodner; A Kaider; P Wagenbichler; S Leodolter; P Husslein; K Mayerhofer
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 0.142

9.  Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery.

Authors:  J W de Leeuw; C de Wit; J P J A Kuijken; H W Bruinse
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 6.531

10.  Effect of timing of episiotomy repair on peripartum blood loss.

Authors:  Basak Baksu; Inci Davas; Atif Akyol; Jale Ozgul; Figen Ezen
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 2.031

View more
  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of Accuracy of Episiotomy Incision in a Governmental Maternity Unit in Palestine: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Hadil Y Ali-Masri; Sahar J Hassan; Kaled M Zimmo; Mohammed W Zimmo; Khaled M K Ismail; Erik Fosse; Hasan Alsalman; Åse Vikanes; Katariina Laine
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2018-10-29

Review 2.  Obstetric anal sphincter injuries: review of anatomical factors and modifiable second stage interventions.

Authors:  Dharmesh S Kapoor; Ranee Thakar; Abdul H Sultan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Cutting an episiotomy at 60 degrees: how good are we?

Authors:  Madhu Naidu; Dharmesh S Kapoor; Sarah Evans; Latha Vinayakarao; Ranee Thakar; Abdul H Sultan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  The correct episiotomy: does it exist? A cross-sectional survey of four public Israeli hospitals and review of the literature.

Authors:  Lena Sagi-Dain; Shlomi Sagi
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Effect of different episiotomy techniques on perineal pain and sexual activity 3 months after delivery.

Authors:  Kathrine Fodstad; Anne Cathrine Staff; Katariina Laine
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Anal incontinence, urinary incontinence and sexual problems in primiparous women - a comparison between women with episiotomy only and women with episiotomy and obstetric anal sphincter injury.

Authors:  Mona Stedenfeldt; Jouko Pirhonen; Ellen Blix; Tom Wilsgaard; Barthold Vonen; Pål Øian
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 7.  Obstetric anal sphincter injuries after episiotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tina Sara Verghese; Rita Champaneria; Dharmesh S Kapoor; Pallavi Manish Latthe
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Lateral episiotomy versus no episiotomy to reduce obstetric anal sphincter injury in vacuum-assisted delivery in nulliparous women: study protocol on a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sandra Bergendahl; Victoria Ankarcrona; Åsa Leijonhufvud; Susanne Hesselman; Sofie Karlström; Helena Kopp Kallner; Sophia Brismar Wendel
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Episiotomy practice and associated factors among mothers who gave birth at public health facilities in Metema district, northwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  Enyew Woretaw; Muluken Teshome; Muluneh Alene
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.223

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.