Literature DB >> 23107777

Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in the management of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: a cause for optimism?

A H Badrek-Amoudi1, T Roe, K Mabey, H Carter, A Mills, A R Dixon.   

Abstract

AIM: The treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is notoriously difficult. Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) is a nonresectional technique for patients with full thickness external rectal prolapse and internal prolapse with obstructed defaecation syndrome (ODS), features associated in the pathogenesis of SRUS. Our aim was to assess the short- and long-term efficacy of LVMR in treating SRUS.
METHOD: Forty-eight patients with SRUS who underwent LVMR over a 15-year period (December 1996 to July 2012) were identified from a prospectively maintained electronic database.
RESULTS: Forty-eight patients, 38 (79%) women, median age 43 (18-80) years, median body mass index 26 (21-40) kg/m(2) underwent LVMR for SRUS after initial biofeedback. The median follow-up was 33 months (95% CI 31-55, range 1-186 months); 52% were followed for more than 3 years and 13 (27%) for more than 5 years. Five (10%) had relapsed following a response to stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR; 10 additional patients have had a continued response to STARR). Eleven (23%) had intermittent reducible external prolapse. Epithelial ulcer healing was reported in all patients at 3 months. The ODS scores improved by 68% (P < 0.0001) and quality of life (QoL; Birmingham Bowel and Urinary Symptoms Questionnaire-22) scores improved by 45% (P < 0.0001). There was a significant improvement in bowel visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 3 and 12 months (P = 0.0007). Sustained improvement in QoL and VAS scores was maintained at 2 years and continued in the 52% followed up for between 3 and 15 years. There were four (8%) symptomatic ODS recurrences: posterior rectal wall prolapse successfully treated by STARR (3) and one symptom free for 2 years following a temporary loop ileostomy. There were two recurrences (4%).
CONCLUSION: LVMR appears to provide a sustained improvement in QoL, VAS and patient satisfaction in patients with SRUS. Morbidity, recurrence and safety profiles are low. Colorectal Disease
© 2012 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23107777     DOI: 10.1111/codi.12077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  11 in total

Review 1.  Abdominal Approaches to Rectal Prolapse.

Authors:  Kyla Joubert; Jonathan A Laryea
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-02

2.  Erosion versus recurrence: is there a compromise using biologics for ventral rectopexy?

Authors:  A R L Stevenson
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Current status of laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for external and internal rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Jan J van Iersel; Tim J C Paulides; Paul M Verheijen; John W Lumley; Ivo A M J Broeders; Esther C J Consten
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: clinical features, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment strategies.

Authors:  Qing-Chao Zhu; Rong-Rong Shen; Huan-Long Qin; Yu Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  A systematic literature review on solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: is there a therapeutic consensus in 2018?

Authors:  Claire Gouriou; Marion Chambaz; Alain Ropert; Guillaume Bouguen; Véronique Desfourneaux; Laurent Siproudhis; Charlène Brochard
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Stepped-wedge randomised trial of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in adults with chronic constipation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ugo Grossi; Natasha Stevens; Eleanor McAlees; Jon Lacy-Colson; Steven Brown; Anthony Dixon; Gian Luca Di Tanna; S Mark Scott; Christine Norton; Nadine Marlin; James Mason; Charles H Knowles
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 7.  Long-term mesh erosion rate following abdominal robotic reconstructive pelvic floor surgery: a prospective study and overview of the literature.

Authors:  Femke van Zanten; Jan J van Iersel; Tim J C Paulides; Paul M Verheijen; Ivo A M J Broeders; Esther C J Consten; Egbert Lenters; Steven E Schraffordt Koops
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 8.  Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Anahita Sadeghi; Mohammad Biglari; Mojgan Forootan; Peyman Adibi
Journal:  Middle East J Dig Dis       Date:  2019-06-28

Review 9.  Mesh-related complications and recurrence after ventral mesh rectopexy with synthetic versus biologic mesh: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  E M van der Schans; M A Boom; M El Moumni; P M Verheijen; I A M J Broeders; E C J Consten
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of medical treatments for the management of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome.

Authors:  Yousef Qari; Mahmoud Mosli
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.