Literature DB >> 23107617

Inguinal lymph node dissection: epidermal vacuum therapy for prevention of wound complications.

Robert Tauber1, Sebastian Schmid, Thomas Horn, Mark Thalgott, Matthias Heck, Bernhard Haller, Hubert Kübler, Michael Autenrieth, Margitta Retz, Jürgen E Gschwend, Tobias Maurer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inguinal lymph node dissection (LND) is often associated with wound complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate epidermal vacuum therapy for the prevention of wound complications following inguinal LND.
METHODS: From January 2009 to March 2012, a total of 24 patients with penile cancer or cancer of the urethra received uni- or bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy in our institution. Postoperative wound care consisted of conventional wound care (CWC) in 16 patients or epidermal vacuum dressings (VAC) in eight patients. Maximum drained fluid per day, duration of drainage, duration of hospitalisation and inguinal complications (formation of lymphocele, persistent lymphorrhoea or lymphoedema of the lower extremity) as well as rate of reinterventions were evaluated retrospectively. Mann-Whitney U-tests were performed to compare treatment groups for maximal drained fluid per day, duration of drainage and duration of hospitalisation. Binary data were compared with Fisher's exact test. Statistical calculations were performed on a patient level.
RESULTS: Patients treated with CWC showed a slight tendency to higher values of maximum drained fluid per day (p=0.632), duration of drainage (p=0.496) and a significantly longer time of hospitalisation (p=0.049). Epidermal VAC treatment resulted in significantly fewer complications such as formation of lymphoceles (62% vs. 20%), persistent lymphorrhoea (45% vs. 7%) or lymphoedema of the lower extremity (46% vs. 0%) (p=0.032). Reinterventions had to be performed in 23% of inguinal wounds (four patients) treated with CWC and for 7% of inguinal wounds (one patient) treated with epidermal VAC (p=0.631).
CONCLUSIONS: Epidermal VAC following inguinal LND might be advantageous for the prevention of postoperative wound complications. Prospective, controlled studies are warranted to further evaluate efficacy and cost-effectiveness.
Copyright © 2012 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23107617     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.09.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  15 in total

1.  [Inguinal lymphadenectomy in penile cancer: Study for prevention of wound complications after inguinal lymphadenectomy in patients with penile cancer by epidermal vacuum therapy (PräVAC, EUDAMED: CIV-12-07-008204; DRKS-ID: DRKS00005257)].

Authors:  T Maurer; A K Seitz; S Schneider; C Protzel; M Retz; H Rexer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  [Cervical, inguinal and abdominal lymphnode dissection].

Authors:  T W Kraus; K Suna; S Berkhoff; E Jäger; U Kraus-Tiefenbacher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  [Inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: study on the prevention of wound healing complications].

Authors:  T Maurer; C Protzel; J E Gschwend; H Rexer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  [Lymph node management of cN0 penile cancer].

Authors:  F Wawroschek; A Winter
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Improving wound healing and preventing surgical site complications of closed surgical incisions: a possible role of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Alessandro Scalise; Roberto Calamita; Caterina Tartaglione; Marina Pierangeli; Elisa Bolletta; Matteo Gioacchini; Rosaria Gesuita; Giovanni Di Benedetto
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Negative pressure wound therapy for managementof the surgical incision in orthopaedic surgery: A review of evidence and mechanisms for an emerging indication.

Authors:  S Karlakki; M Brem; S Giannini; V Khanduja; J Stannard; R Martin
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 5.853

7.  Debulking surgery for elephantiasis nostras with large ectatic podoplanin-negative lymphatic vessels in patients with lipo-lymphedema.

Authors:  Uwe Wollina; Birgit Heinig; Jaqueline Schönlebe; Andreas Nowak
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2014-02-28

8.  Application of the Single Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Device (PICO) on a Heterogeneous Group of Surgical and Traumatic Wounds.

Authors:  Caroline Payne; Daren Edwards
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2014-04-28

9.  Reducing morbidity with surgical adhesives following inguinal lymph node dissections for the treatment of malignant skin tumors.

Authors:  Peter L Stollwerck; Dominik Schlarb; Nicole Münstermann; Sebastian Stenske; Christoph Kruess; Gerhard Brodner; Björn Dirk Krapohl; Albrecht F Krause-Bergmann
Journal:  GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW       Date:  2016-01-20

10.  Effective combination of lymphatico-venous anastomosis and negative pressure wound therapy for lymphocyst: A Case Study.

Authors:  Ayano Shimono; Hisashi Sakuma; Shiho Watanabe; Hikaru Kono
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 1.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.