Literature DB >> 23107236

Minimally invasive treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla: a proof-of-concept prospective study with a follow-up of between 36 and 54 months.

Alessandro Pozzi1, Gianpaolo Sannino, Alberto Barlattani.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: In the posterior maxilla, tooth loss is usually associated with alveolar bone resorption and sinus pneumatization, limiting the placement of implants without grafting procedures.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a minimally invasive treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla, with axial and tilted implants and immediate loading. The research hypothesis was that the combination of a guided, minimally invasive approach and the biomimetic features of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) abutments would be an effective alternative to maxillary sinus floor augmentation procedures with reduced bone resorption around implants.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-seven consecutive participants (female=12, male=15) (mean age 54.18 years) with severe atrophy of the posterior maxilla were treated by using guided surgery with immediately loaded axial (39) and tilted (42) implants supporting CAD/CAM zirconia (39) and titanium (42) abutments (81 total) and partial fixed prostheses. Each participant underwent a computed tomography scan, after which 2 or 3 implants were positioned with a flapless or miniflap approach. The drilling protocol was adapted to the bone density of each implant site to obtain an insertion torque ranging between 40 and 50 Ncm. CAD/CAM customized abutments composed of zirconia or titanium were fixed to the implants with prosthetic screws tightened with a torque of 35 Ncm. An acrylic resin interim restoration reinforced with metal was placed immediately. Five to 6 months after initial loading, a zirconia framework was manufactured, and a definitive prosthesis was placed. Clinical and radiological controls were performed at baseline and after 1 and 3 years to assess implant and prosthesis survival and success rate and compare marginal bone remodeling of axial and tilted implants. Inferential statistics for radiological data were acquired by using the Mann-Whitney U-test. All statistical comparisons were conducted at the .05 significance level.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 43.3 months (ranging from 36 months to 54 months). The cumulative implant survival rate was 96.3% at 3 years. All prosthetic restorations were stable and in good function, resulting in a cumulative prosthetic survival rate of 100%. Three restorations had chipping of the veneer material; thereafter, the cumulative prosthetic success rate was 91.9%.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of the posterior partially edentulous atrophic maxilla with guided surgery and immediate loading of tilted and straight implants supporting short-span partial fixed dental prostheses is effective.
Copyright © 2012 The Editorial Council of the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23107236     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60178-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Development of tilted implant for free end of maxillary posterior teeth].

Authors:  Xi-Rui Xin; Qing Cai; Han-Chi Wang; Yan-Min Zhou
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-02-01

2.  Dynamic UCLA for single tilted implant in an aesthetic region.

Authors:  Marcelo Coelho Goiato; Mariana Vilela Sônego; Emily Vivianne Freitas da Silva; Stefan Fiuza de Carvalho Dekon; Rodrigo Antonio de Medeiros; Karina Helga Turcio de Carvalho; Daniela Micheline Dos Santos
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2015-01-10

Review 3.  Influence of implant location on the clinical outcomes of implant abutments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amr G ElHoussiney; He Zhang; Jinlin Song; Ping Ji; Lu Wang; Sheng Yang
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2018-02-26

4.  Digital versus Traditional Workflow for Posterior Maxillary Rehabilitations Supported by One Straight and One Tilted Implant: A 3-Year Prospective Comparative Study.

Authors:  Francesco Ferrini; Paolo Capparé; Raffaele Vinci; Enrico F Gherlone; Gianpaolo Sannino
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-11       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Sinus lift: 3 years follow up comparing autogenous bone block versus autogenous particulated grafts.

Authors:  Luca Pisoni; Antonio Lucchi; Marco Persia; Otello Marchi; Paolo Ordesi; Sandro Siervo
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.080

Review 6.  Influence of different implant placement techniques to improve primary implant stability in low-density bone: A systematic review.

Authors:  Jayant N Palaskar; Nikhil Joshi; Pooja M Shah; Poorva Gullapalli; Vineet Vinay
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2020-01-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.