Literature DB >> 23107099

NADiA ProsVue prostate-specific antigen slope is an independent prognostic marker for identifying men at reduced risk of clinical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Judd W Moul1, Hans Lilja, O John Semmes, Raymond S Lance, Robert L Vessella, Martin Fleisher, Clarisse Mazzola, Mark J Sarno, Barbara Stevens, Robert E Klem, Jonathan E McDermed, Melissa T Triebell, Thomas H Adams.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To validate the hypothesis that men displaying serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) slopes ≤ 2.0 pg/mL/mo after prostatectomy, measured using a new immuno-polymerase chain reaction diagnostic test (NADiA ProsVue), have a reduced risk of clinical recurrence as determined by positive biopsy, imaging findings, or death from prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 4 clinical sites, we selected a cohort of 304 men who had been followed up for 17.6 years after prostatectomy for clinical recurrence. We assessed the prognostic value of a PSA slope cutpoint of 2.0 pg/mL/mo against established risk factors to identify men at low risk of clinical recurrence using uni- and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses.
RESULTS: The univariate hazard ratio of a PSA slope >2.0 pg/mL/mo was 18.3 (95% confidence interval 10.6-31.8) compared with a slope ≤ 2.0 pg/mL/mo (P <.0001). The median disease-free survival interval was 4.8 years vs >10 years in the 2 groups (P <.0001). The multivariate hazard ratio for PSA slope with the covariates of preprostatectomy PSA, pathologic stage, and Gleason score was 9.8 (95% confidence interval 5.4-17.8), an 89.8% risk reduction for men with PSA slopes ≤ 2.0 pg/mL/mo (P <.0001). The Gleason score (<7 vs ≥ 7) was the only other significant predictor (hazard ratio 5.4, 95% confidence interval 2.1-13.8, P = .0004).
CONCLUSION: Clinical recurrence after radical prostatectomy is difficult to predict using established risk factors. We have demonstrated that a NADiA ProsVue PSA slope of ≤ 2.0 pg/mL/mo after prostatectomy is prognostic for a reduced risk of prostate cancer recurrence and adds predictive power to the established risk factors.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23107099      PMCID: PMC4452955          DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.06.080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  23 in total

Review 1.  The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein; William C Allsbrook; Mahul B Amin; Lars L Egevad
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Ultrasensitive serum prostate specific antigen nadir accurately predicts the risk of early relapse after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Samson Shen; Herbert Lepor; Robert Yaffee; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Prognostic significance of undetectable ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen nadir after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sung Kyu Hong; Hong Zoo Park; Won Ki Lee; Dae Sung Kim; June Suk Lee; Seung Hwan Doo; Seong Jin Jeong; Cheol Yong Yoon; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  The evolving definition of advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Judd W Moul
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

5.  Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  C R Pound; A W Partin; M A Eisenberger; D W Chan; J D Pearson; P C Walsh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-05-05       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Long-term survival after radical prostatectomy compared to other treatments in older men with local/regional prostate cancer.

Authors:  Liqian Liu; Ann L Coker; Xianglin L Du; Janice N Cormier; Charles E Ford; Shenying Fang
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 7.  Cancer statistics, 2004.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Ram C Tiwari; Taylor Murray; Asma Ghafoor; Alicia Samuels; Elizabeth Ward; Eric J Feuer; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Inadequacy of prostate-specific antigen doubling time estimates calculated using an ultrasensitive assay of prostate-specific antigen for biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Fumitaka Shimizu; Yutaka Matsuyama; Takashi Tominaga; Yasuo Ohashi; Makoto Fujime
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  A critical analysis of the interpretation of biochemical failure in surgically treated patients using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiation and Oncology criteria.

Authors:  Matthew B Gretzer; Bruce J Trock; Misop Han; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Epidemiology of radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer in the era of prostate-specific antigen: an overview of the Department of Defense Center for Prostate Disease Research national database.

Authors:  Judd W Moul; Hongyu Wu; Leon Sun; David G McLeod; Christopher Amling; Raymond Lance; Leo Kusuda; Timothy Donahue; John Foley; Andrew Chung; Wade Sexton; Douglas Soderdahl; Norman M Rich
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  2 in total

1.  Recommendations on screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen test.

Authors:  Neil Bell; Sarah Connor Gorber; Amanda Shane; Michel Joffres; Harminder Singh; James Dickinson; Elizabeth Shaw; Lesley Dunfield; Marcello Tonelli
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Genome-Based Classification and Therapy of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Arlou Kristina Angeles; Simone Bauer; Leonie Ratz; Sabine M Klauck; Holger Sültmann
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.