Literature DB >> 23106799

The impact of body mass index on surgical outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy.

Wahib E Isac1, Riccardo Autorino, Shahab P Hillyer, Adrian V Hernandez, Robert J Stein, Jihad H Kaouk.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Study Type--Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4. "What's known on the subject?" and "What does the study add?" Obesity is associated with higher incidence of renal cell carcinoma. Laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) was shown to be technically feasible in the obese population. In the present study we evaluated the impact of obesity on outcome of RPN, in a large cohort of patients. In the present study, obese patients had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score and larger tumour size. We evaluated obesity as a categorical and a continuous variable, and we adjusted for confounding factors. We categorized obesity based according to the WHO classification of obesity. We described our technical modifications to overcome difficulties that can be encountered during the surgery. Obese patients had a higher estimated blood loss, but no difference in blood transfusion rate, operation duration or warm ischaemia time.
OBJECTIVE: • To assess the impact of body mass index (BMI) on the surgical outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: • Medical charts of 250 consecutive patients who underwent RPN at our institution between 2006 and 2010 were reviewed. • Patients were categorized based on their BMI into four groups per international classification of obesity into: normal (BMI < 25 kg/m(2)), overweight (25-29.9), obese (30-39.9) and morbidly obese (≥ 40). • Preoperative characteristics as well as perioperative and postoperative outcomes were analysed and compared between the groups.
RESULTS: • Of the 250 patients, 43 (17.2% of the entire cohort) were non-obese, 104 (41.6%) were overweight, 75 (30%) were obese, and 28 (11.2%) were morbidly obese. • Groups were similar in terms of age, gender, history of previous surgery and nephrometry score (P = 0.5). • Patients with higher BMI had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (median 3 for obese and morbidly obese groups vs 2 for non-obese groups; P = 0.002) and tumour size (median 3.6, 2.9, 2.5 and 2.3 cm in those who were morbidly obese, obese, overweight and with normal BMI, respectively; P = 0.005). • Patients within the morbidly obese group had a higher estimated blood loss (median 250 mL) than other groups (median: 200, 200, 150 mL, respectively) (P = 0.03). • No significant difference was detected between the groups in terms of operation duration, warm ischaemia time, transfusion rate and postoperative complications.
CONCLUSION: • Robotic partial nephrectomy represents an effective treatment modality for renal tumours providing equivalent surgical outcomes even for patients with BMI up to 60 kg/m(2).
© 2012 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23106799     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11318.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  12 in total

Review 1.  Partial Nephrectomy in the Overweight Patient: an Overview.

Authors:  Ben Schurhamer; Nathan Littlejohn; Ehab Eltahawy; Rodney Davis; Mohamed Kamel
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  An increasing proportion of perinephric to subcutaneous fat is associated with adverse perioperative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Jay D Raman; Christopher Reynolds; Michael Hannon
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-05-09

3. 

Authors:  Berrin Günaydın; Ömer Kurtipek
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2018-06-01

4.  Robotic partial nephrectomy for renal tumours in obese patients: Perioperative outcomes in a multi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  Newaj Abdullah; Deepansh Dalela; Ravi Barod; Jeff Larson; Michael Johnson; Alon Mass; Homayoun Zargar; Mohamad Allaf; Sam Bhayani; Michael Stifelman; Jihad Kaouk; Craig Rogers
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  The impact of body mass index on renal functional outcomes following minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Kyle A Richards; Edris Negron; Joshua A Cohn; Zoe Steinberg; Scott E Eggener; Arieh L Shalhav
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  A Critical Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes in Morbidly Obese Patients Following Renal Mass Surgery.

Authors:  Matthew D Grimes; Michael L Blute; Tyler A Wittmann; Michael A Mann; Kristin Zorn; Tracy M Downs; Fangfang Shi; David F Jarrard; Sara L Best; Kyle A Richards; Stephen Y Nakada; E Jason Abel
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 7.  Perioperative complications of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Eric H Kim; Jeffrey A Larson; Michael Figenshau; R Sherburne Figenshau
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Extreme obesity does not predict poor cancer outcomes after surgery for renal cell cancer.

Authors:  Michael L Blute; Kristin Zorn; Matthew Grimes; Fangfang Shi; Tracy M Downs; David F Jarrard; Sara L Best; Kyle Richards; Stephen Y Nakada; E Jason Abel
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  A propensity-score matched comparison of perioperative and early renal functional outcomes of robotic versus open partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Zhenjie Wu; Mingmin Li; Le Qu; Huamao Ye; Bing Liu; Qing Yang; Jing Sheng; Liang Xiao; Chen Lv; Bo Yang; Xu Gao; Xiaofeng Gao; Chuanliang Xu; Jianguo Hou; Yinghao Sun; Linhui Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Obesity is not associated with increased operative complications in single-site robotic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Christos Komninos; Patrick Tuliao; Kyo Chul Koo; Chien-Hsiang Chang; Woong Kyu Han; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.