Literature DB >> 27160676

An increasing proportion of perinephric to subcutaneous fat is associated with adverse perioperative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy.

Jay D Raman1, Christopher Reynolds2, Michael Hannon3.   

Abstract

To investigate the association of perinephric fat (PF) thickness and the ratio of perinephric to subcutaneous fat (PF:SF) thickness on perioperative outcomes following robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN), 240 patients undergoing RPN with preoperative computed tomography (CT) axial imaging were included. Perinephric and subcutaneous fat thickness was measured at the level of the renal vein and umbilicus, respectively. The association between PF thickness and PF:SF ratio and perioperative outcomes was determined by Spearman correlation and logistic regression. 121 men and 119 women with a median age of 55 years, BMI of 32, tumor size of 2.6 cm, and RENAL nephrometry score of 6 were included. On preoperative imaging, median PF thickness was 2.2 cm, SF thickness was 3.1 cm, and PF:SF ratio was 0.63. There were statistically significant positive correlations between PF thickness (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.26, p = 0.001) and PF:SF ratio (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.33, p < 0.0001) with longer operative duration of RPN. In addition, an increasing PF:SF ratio was associated with a greater risk of perioperative complications (OR = 1.82, 95 % CI 1.1-3.0, p = 0.02). No association was observed with respect to ischemia time, blood loss, length of stay, or margin status. PF thickness is associated with longer OR duration, and a greater PF:SF ratio correlated with increased OR duration and complications following RPN. These easily measured indices of fat distribution are likely more accurate in predicting perioperative outcomes after RPN than BMI alone.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adipose fat; Body mass index (BMI); Partial nephrectomy; Visceral fat

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27160676     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-016-0593-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  13 in total

1.  Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in obese patients.

Authors:  Jose R Colombo; Georges-Pascal Haber; Monish Aron; Meng Xu; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in obese patients.

Authors:  Naveed Naeem; Firas Petros; Shyam Sukumar; Manish Patel; Akshay Bhandari; Sanjeev Kaul; Mani Menon; Craig Rogers
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Increased intra-abdominal fat predicts perioperative complications following minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Michael A Gorin; Jeffrey K Mullins; Phillip M Pierorazio; Gautam Jayram; Mohamad E Allaf
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Rising incidence of small renal masses: a need to reassess treatment effect.

Authors:  John M Hollingsworth; David C Miller; Stephanie Daignault; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  An obese body habitus does not preclude a minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Christopher Reynolds; Michael Hannon; Kathleen Lehman; Lewis E Harpster; Jay D Raman
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.344

6.  A multicentre matched-pair analysis comparing robot-assisted versus open partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Andrea Minervini; Alessandro Antonelli; Sam Bhayani; Giorgio Guazzoni; Nicola Longo; Giuseppe Martorana; Giuseppe Morgia; Alexander Mottrie; James Porter; Claudio Simeone; Gianni Vittori; Filiberto Zattoni; Marco Carini
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth.

Authors:  Alexander Kutikov; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Effect of visceral obesity on minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Edward Ioffe; A Ari Hakimi; Sarah K Oh; Ilir Agalliu; Natasha Ginzburg; Steve K Williams; Linda Kao; Alla M Rozenblit; Reza Ghavamian
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Increasing body mass index negatively impacts outcomes following robotic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Michael P Herman; Jay D Raman; Steven Dong; David Samadi; Douglas S Scherr
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  4 in total

1.  Visceral fat is associated with high-grade complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for small renal masses.

Authors:  Kelan Nesbitt; Pranav Sharma
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2021-03-29

2.  Significant impact of three-dimensional volumetry of perinephric fat on the console time during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Daisuke Motoyama; Yuto Matsushita; Hiromitsu Watanabe; Keita Tamura; Toshiki Ito; Takayuki Sugiyama; Atsushi Otsuka; Hideaki Miyake
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.264

3.  Abdominal subcutaneous fat quantification in obese patients from limited field-of-view MRI data.

Authors:  Sophia Michel; Nicolas Linder; Tobias Eggebrecht; Alexander Schaudinn; Matthias Blüher; Arne Dietrich; Timm Denecke; Harald Busse
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score of non-donated kidney aids in predicting post-operative renal function following donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  Katherine J Cockerill; Amanda E Kahn; Stacy M Young; Colleen T Ball; Martin L Mai; C Burcin Taner; Dana K Perry; David D Thiel
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 2.264

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.