Literature DB >> 23106699

Quantitative genetic approaches to evolutionary constraint: how useful?

Jeffrey K Conner1.   

Abstract

The study of evolutionary constraint is an active and important area, and genetic correlations and quantitative genetic techniques more generally have been the dominant approach to constraint. Here, I argue that genetic correlations are not very useful for studying constraint, review recent alternative approaches, and briefly discuss the state of our knowledge of the evolutionary importance of constraints caused by genetic variance and covariance.
© 2012 The Author. Evolution© 2012 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23106699     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01794.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  15 in total

1.  Do traits separated by metamorphosis evolve independently? Concepts and methods.

Authors:  Julie Collet; Simon Fellous
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Modularity and intra-floral integration in metameric organisms: plants are more than the sum of their parts.

Authors:  Pamela K Diggle
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Accessibility, constraint, and repetition in adaptive floral evolution.

Authors:  Carolyn A Wessinger; Lena C Hileman
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Antagonistic selection and pleiotropy constrain the evolution of plant chemical defenses.

Authors:  Rose A Keith; Thomas Mitchell-Olds
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Effects of pathogen exposure on life-history variation in the gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar).

Authors:  D J Páez; A E Fleming-Davies; G Dwyer
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Modularity: genes, development and evolution.

Authors:  Diogo Melo; Arthur Porto; James M Cheverud; Gabriel Marroig
Journal:  Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 13.915

7.  Sexually antagonistic selection on genetic variation underlying both male and female same-sex sexual behavior.

Authors:  David Berger; Tao You; Maravillas R Minano; Karl Grieshop; Martin I Lind; Göran Arnqvist; Alexei A Maklakov
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.260

Review 8.  Life-History Evolution and the Genetics of Fitness Components in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Thomas Flatt
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Low cross-sex genetic correlation in carotenoid-based plumage traits in the blue tit nestlings (Cyanistes caeruleus).

Authors:  Szymon M Drobniak; Dariusz Wiejaczka; Aneta Arct; Anna Dubiec; Lars Gustafsson; Mariusz Cichoń
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Impacts of genetic correlation on the independent evolution of body mass and skeletal size in mammals.

Authors:  Marta Marchini; Leah M Sparrow; Miranda N Cosman; Alexandra Dowhanik; Carsten B Krueger; Benedikt Hallgrimsson; Campbell Rolian
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.