Literature DB >> 23104816

The attenuation surface for contrast sensitivity has the form of a witch's hat within the central visual field.

Alex S Baldwin1, Tim S Meese, Daniel H Baker.   

Abstract

Over the full visual field, contrast sensitivity is fairly well described by a linear decline in log sensitivity as a function of eccentricity (expressed in grating cycles). However, many psychophysical studies of spatial visual function concentrate on the central ±4.5 deg (or so) of the visual field. As the details of the variation in sensitivity have not been well documented in this region we did so for small patches of target contrast at several spatial frequencies (0.7-4 c/deg), meridians (horizontal, vertical, and oblique), orientations (horizontal, vertical, and oblique), and eccentricities (0-18 cycles). To reduce the potential effects of stimulus uncertainty, circular markers surrounded the targets. Our analysis shows that the decline in binocular log sensitivity within the central visual field is bilinear: The initial decline is steep, whereas the later decline is shallow and much closer to the classical results. The bilinear decline was approximately symmetrical in the horizontal meridian and declined most steeply in the superior visual field. Further analyses showed our results to be scale-invariant and that this property could not be predicted from cone densities. We used the results from the cardinal meridians to radially interpolate an attenuation surface with the shape of a witch's hat that provided good predictions for the results from the oblique meridians. The witch's hat provides a convenient starting point from which to build models of contrast sensitivity, including those designed to investigate signal summation and neuronal convergence of the image contrast signal. Finally, we provide Matlab code for constructing the witch's hat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23104816     DOI: 10.1167/12.11.23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  14 in total

1.  Visual field asymmetries vary between children and adults.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Mariel Roberts; Caroline Myers; Lavanya Shukla
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 10.900

2.  Binocular contrast summation and inhibition depends on spatial frequency, eccentricity and binocular disparity.

Authors:  Concetta F Alberti; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2018-09-16       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Factors affecting reading speed in patients with diabetic macular edema treated with laser photocoagulation.

Authors:  Elizabeth Pearce; Sobha Sivaprasad; Ngaihang V Chong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The How and Why of Consciousness?

Authors:  Tim S Meese
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-21

5.  Searchers adjust their eye-movement dynamics to target characteristics in natural scenes.

Authors:  Lars O M Rothkegel; Heiko H Schütt; Hans A Trukenbrod; Felix A Wichmann; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Asymmetries in visual acuity around the visual field.

Authors:  Antoine Barbot; Shutian Xue; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Asymmetries around the visual field: From retina to cortex to behavior.

Authors:  Eline R Kupers; Noah C Benson; Marisa Carrasco; Jonathan Winawer
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Grid-texture mechanisms in human vision: Contrast detection of regular sparse micro-patterns requires specialist templates.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Tim S Meese
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  What Do Contrast Threshold Equivalent Noise Studies Actually Measure? Noise vs. Nonlinearity in Different Masking Paradigms.

Authors:  Alex S Baldwin; Daniel H Baker; Robert F Hess
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Stimulus-dependent contrast sensitivity asymmetries around the visual field.

Authors:  Marc M Himmelberg; Jonathan Winawer; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.