BACKGROUND: Smoking has been hypothesized to decrease biosynthesis of parent estrogens (estradiol and estrone) and increase their metabolism by 2-hydroxylation. However, comprehensive studies of smoking and estrogen metabolism by 2-, 4-, or 16-hydroxylation are sparse. METHODS: Fifteen urinary estrogens and estrogen metabolites (jointly called EM) were measured by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS-MS) in luteal phase urine samples collected during 1996 to 1999 from 603 premenopausal women in the Nurses' Health Study II (NHSII; 35 current, 140 former, and 428 never smokers). We calculated geometric means and percentage differences of individual EM (pmol/mg creatinine), metabolic pathway groups, and pathway ratios, by smoking status and cigarettes per day (CPD). RESULTS: Total EM and parent estrogens were nonsignificantly lower in current compared with never smokers, with estradiol significant (P(multivariate) = 0.02). We observed nonsignificantly lower 16-pathway EM (P = 0.08) and higher 4-pathway EM (P = 0.25) and similar 2-pathway EM in current versus never smokers. EM measures among former smokers were similar to never smokers. Increasing CPD was significantly associated with lower 16-pathway EM (P-trend = 0.04) and higher 4-pathway EM (P-trend = 0.05). Increasing CPD was significantly positively associated with the ratios of 2- and 4-pathway to parent estrogens (P-trend = 0.01 and 0.002), 2- and 4-pathway to 16-pathway (P-trend = 0.02 and 0.003), and catechols to methylated catechols (P-trend = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: As hypothesized, we observed lower urinary levels of total EM and parent estrogens in active smokers. Our results also suggest smoking is associated with altered estrogen metabolism, specifically increased 2- and 4-hydroxylation, decreased 16-hydroxylation, and decreased catechol methylation. IMPACT: Our study suggests how smoking might influence estrogen-related cancers and conditions.
BACKGROUND: Smoking has been hypothesized to decrease biosynthesis of parent estrogens (estradiol and estrone) and increase their metabolism by 2-hydroxylation. However, comprehensive studies of smoking and estrogen metabolism by 2-, 4-, or 16-hydroxylation are sparse. METHODS: Fifteen urinary estrogens and estrogen metabolites (jointly called EM) were measured by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS-MS) in luteal phase urine samples collected during 1996 to 1999 from 603 premenopausal women in the Nurses' Health Study II (NHSII; 35 current, 140 former, and 428 never smokers). We calculated geometric means and percentage differences of individual EM (pmol/mg creatinine), metabolic pathway groups, and pathway ratios, by smoking status and cigarettes per day (CPD). RESULTS: Total EM and parent estrogens were nonsignificantly lower in current compared with never smokers, with estradiol significant (P(multivariate) = 0.02). We observed nonsignificantly lower 16-pathway EM (P = 0.08) and higher 4-pathway EM (P = 0.25) and similar 2-pathway EM in current versus never smokers. EM measures among former smokers were similar to never smokers. Increasing CPD was significantly associated with lower 16-pathway EM (P-trend = 0.04) and higher 4-pathway EM (P-trend = 0.05). Increasing CPD was significantly positively associated with the ratios of 2- and 4-pathway to parent estrogens (P-trend = 0.01 and 0.002), 2- and 4-pathway to 16-pathway (P-trend = 0.02 and 0.003), and catechols to methylated catechols (P-trend = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: As hypothesized, we observed lower urinary levels of total EM and parent estrogens in active smokers. Our results also suggest smoking is associated with altered estrogen metabolism, specifically increased 2- and 4-hydroxylation, decreased 16-hydroxylation, and decreased catechol methylation. IMPACT: Our study suggests how smoking might influence estrogen-related cancers and conditions.
Authors: Renée T Fortner; Susan E Hankinson; Catherine Schairer; Xia Xu; Regina G Ziegler; A Heather Eliassen Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-03-27 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: A Heather Eliassen; Regina G Ziegler; Lauren C Houghton; Julia S Sisti; Susan E Hankinson; Jing Xie; Xia Xu; Robert N Hoover Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Julia S Sisti; Susan E Hankinson; Neil E Caporaso; Fangyi Gu; Rulla M Tamimi; Bernard Rosner; Xia Xu; Regina Ziegler; A Heather Eliassen Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2015-06-10 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Fangyi Gu; Andriy Derkach; Neal D Freedman; Maria Teresa Landi; Demetrius Albanes; Stephanie J Weinstein; Alison M Mondul; Charles E Matthews; Kristin A Guertin; Qian Xiao; Wei Zheng; Xiao-Ou Shu; Joshua N Sampson; Steven C Moore; Neil E Caporaso Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2015-12-31 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Terryl J Hartman; Julia S Sisti; Susan E Hankinson; Xia Xu; A Heather Eliassen; Regina Ziegler Journal: Horm Cancer Date: 2016-01-04 Impact factor: 3.869
Authors: Jonine D Figueroa; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Deesha A Patel; Laura Linville; Louise A Brinton; Gretchen L Gierach; Xiaohong R Yang; Daphne Papathomas; Daniel Visscher; Carolyn Mies; Amy C Degnim; William F Anderson; Stephen Hewitt; Zeina G Khodr; Susan E Clare; Anna Maria Storniolo; Mark E Sherman Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2014-10-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Michele L Cote; Tala Alhajj; Julie J Ruterbusch; Leslie Bernstein; Louise A Brinton; William J Blot; Chu Chen; Margery Gass; Sarah Gaussoin; Brian Henderson; Eunjung Lee; Pamela L Horn-Ross; Laurence N Kolonel; Andrew Kaunitz; Xiaolin Liang; Wanda K Nicholson; Amy B Park; Stacey Petruzella; Timothy R Rebbeck; V Wendy Setiawan; Lisa B Signorello; Michael S Simon; Noel S Weiss; Nicolas Wentzensen; Hannah P Yang; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Sara H Olson Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2014-12-23 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Hannah Oh; Stephanie A Smith-Warner; Rulla M Tamimi; Molin Wang; Xia Xu; Susan E Hankinson; Barbara J Fuhrman; Regina G Ziegler; A Heather Eliassen Journal: J Nutr Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Andrea H Weinberger; Philip H Smith; Sharon S Allen; Kelly P Cosgrove; Michael E Saladin; Kevin M Gray; Carolyn M Mazure; Cora Lee Wetherington; Sherry A McKee Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 4.244