Literature DB >> 23104198

Postoperative distal adding-on and related factors in Lenke type 1A curve.

Morio Matsumoto1, Kota Watanabe, Naobumi Hosogane, Noriaki Kawakami, Taichi Tsuji, Koki Uno, Teppei Suzuki, Manabu Ito, Haruhisa Yanagida, Toru Yamaguchi, Shohei Minami, Tsutomu Akazawa.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective, multicenter study.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the occurrence of and factors related to postoperative adding-on in Lenke type 1A curve. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although several studies have investigated factors associated with adding-on in Lenke type 1A curve, these factors have not been elucidated in a large study population.
METHODS: This study included 112 patients who were followed more than 2 years after undergoing selective posterior thoracic fusion surgery for Lenke Type 1A curve (8 males, 104 females; mean age at surgery, 16.1 yr; mean follow-up, 3.6 yr). The lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) was T12 in 22 patients, L1 in 55, L2 in 32, and L3 in 3. Distal to the main thoracic curve, the end vertebra, neutral vertebra, stable vertebra (SV), and the last vertebra touching the central sacral vertical line (last touching vertebra, LTV) were determined. The occurrence and factors associated with distal adding-on were investigated.
RESULTS: The mean Cobb angle and apical translation of the main thoracic curve were 54.6° ± 9.6° and 53.1 ± 20.4 mm before surgery, and 14.2 ± 7.4 and 16.2 ± 12.7 at follow-up, respectively. Distal adding-on was observed in 21 patients (18.8%) at follow-up. Univariate analyses identified several factors significantly associated with adding-on, including the preoperative proximal thoracic curve, the apical translation of the main thoracic curve, Miyanji's subclassification, the postsurgical proximal and main thoracic curves, the postsurgical apical translation of the main thoracic curve, the correction rate of the main thoracic curve and the clavicle angle immediately after surgery and at follow-up, and the difference in levels between the LIV and the end vertebra, neutral vertebra, LTV, and stable vertebra. Logistic regression analysis showed that the apical translation of the main thoracic curve immediately after surgery (apical translation >25 mm, odds ratio: 10.7, 95% confidence interval: 3.1-37.0, P = 0.001) and the difference in levels between LIV and LTV (LIV-LTV) (LIV-LTV <0, odds ratio: 6.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.9-23.9, P = 0.003) were significantly associated with adding-on.
CONCLUSION: Since the residual apical translation of the main thoracic curve and the lowest instrumented vertebra more cranial to the last touching vertebra were significantly associated with adding-on, surgeons may need to obtain the maximum reduction of the apical translation of the main thoracic curve and to extend the LIV at least to the LTV to avoid postoperative adding-on.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23104198     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318279b666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  13 in total

1.  Selective versus hyperselective posterior fusions in Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of radiological and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  B Ilharreborde; E Ferrero; A Angelliaume; Y Lefèvre; F Accadbled; A L Simon; J Sales de Gauzy; K Mazda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Optimizing the fusion level for lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: is the S-line a validated and reproducible tool to predict coronal decompensation?

Authors:  Tianyuan Zhang; Shibin Shu; Wenting Jing; Qi Gu; Zezhang Zhu; Zhen Liu; Yong Qiu; Xu Sun; Bin Wang; Hongda Bao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Preventing Fusion Mass Shift Avoids Postoperative Distal Curve Adding-on in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Hideki Shigematsu; Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Mauro Bruzzone; Hiroaki Matsumori; Kin-Cheung Mak; Dino Samartzis; Keith Dip Kei Luk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Posterior Spinal Fusion With Multilevel Posterolateral Convex Disc Releases for the Treatment of Severe Thoracolumbar Scoliosis.

Authors:  Christopher Mikhail; Robert Brochin; Lily Eaker; Baron S Lonner
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-06-30

5.  Distal adding-on after surgery in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: clinical and radiological outcomes.

Authors:  Wenbin Hua; Zhiwei Liao; Wencan Ke; Shuai Li; Xiaobo Feng; Bingjin Wang; Kun Wang; Xinghuo Wu; Yukun Zhang; Yong Gao; Li Ling; Cao Yang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 2.562

6.  Is it enough to stop distal fusion at L3 in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with major thoracolumbar/lumbar curves?

Authors:  Choon Sung Lee; Jung-Ki Ha; Chang Ju Hwang; Dong-Ho Lee; Tae Hyung Kim; Jae Hwan Cho
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Defining risk factors for adding-on in Lenke 1 and 2 AR curves.

Authors:  Brendon C Mitchell; David L Skaggs; Lawrence G Lenke; Tracey P Bastrom; Carrie E Bartley; Peter O Newton
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-07-03

8.  Posterior-only surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an Egyptian experience.

Authors:  Belal Elnady; Mohammad M El-Sharkawi; Mohamed El-Meshtawy; Faisal F Adam; Galal Zaki Said
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2017-12-11

9.  Natural History of Postoperative Adding-On in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: What Are the Risk Factors for Progressive Adding-On?

Authors:  Xiaodong Qin; Chao Xia; Leilei Xu; Fei Sheng; Huang Yan; Yong Qiu; Zezhang Zhu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Choosing the Distal Fusion Levels in Lenke Type 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: How Do the Existing Classifications and Recommendations Guide Us?

Authors:  Bhavuk Garg; Nishank Mehta; Rudra Narayan Mukherjee
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-03-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.